- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02739178
The Sukhshanti Study: Effect of a Sanitation Intervention on Women's Health
April 2, 2019 updated by: University of Oklahoma
The Sukhshanti Study: a Controlled Before-and-after Mixed Methods Study of the Effect of a Sanitation Intervention on Women's Health in Bihar, India
The study will measure the impact of sanitation access on women and girl's social and emotional health, behaviors, and quality of life in rural India before and after a sanitation intervention compared to a comparison group that will receive the same intervention at a later date.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This mixed-methods, quasi-experimental study will evaluate the extent to which the Global Sanitation Fund (GSF) sanitation program in Bihar, India improves health and well-being among women and girls. Our study consists of a controlled before-and-after (CBA) study with an embedded ethnography.
Specific objectives are:
- Measure the effect of the GSF intervention on sanitation-related psychosocial stress (SRPS), generalized psychosocial stress (PSS), perceived quality of life, hair cortisol, and urogenital health among women between the ages of 14 and 65.
- Measure changes in sanitation adoption (e.g.: sanitation access and exclusive use) among individuals / households receiving the GSF intervention.
- Document individual and community experiences with sanitation, intervention participation, and latrine coverage through ethnographic methods.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
1275
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mumbai, India, 400 022
- NEERMAN
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
10 years to 61 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- between 14 years to 65 years old
- live in geographic area receiving GSF sanitation intervention in 2016
- live in geographic areas matched to intervention communities
Exclusion Criteria:
- less than 25 years old and not reached menarche
- greater than 25 years old and never married
- refusal to participate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: GSF Sanitation intervention
This arm will receive the GSF sanitation intervention, a community-level sanitation intervention
|
Intervention utilizes community-based demand generation matched with supply side improvements to improve access and use of sanitation facilities in rural communities.
This is complimented with multi-stakeholder engagement to promote cooperation and coordination with national, state, and local stakeholders.
|
|
No Intervention: Comparator
This arm will receive the GSF intervention in 2017 or later.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sanitation-Related Psychosocial Stress Scale (SRPS)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
|
The SRPS consist of 25 yes/no questions on experiences related to sanitation within the past thirty days of the date the SRPS is completed.This SRPS Scale specifically includes questions related to defecation, menstrual hygiene management, and post-defecation cleaning - the three behaviors that have the greatest contribution to sanitation-related psychosocial stress among women in India.
|
12 month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
|
A measure for non-specific perceived stress.
The PSS10 is the short form of the PSS and consist of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4).
Scores are calculated by reverse scoring items with positive wording and summing across all items for a final score of 0 to 40.
The PSS10 is not a diagnostic scale.
|
12 month follow-up
|
|
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
|
The K10 provides a measure of non-specific psychological distress and consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5).
Scores are calculated by summing response across each item.
|
12 month follow-up
|
|
The WHO5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
|
The WHO5 consist of 5 items rated on a 6-point Likert scale (0 to 5) related to subjective well-being, vitality, and mood.
|
12 month follow-up
|
|
Self-reported urogenital infections
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
|
Urogenital infections, a health outcome linked to both menstrual hygiene management practices and sanitation access (Das et al., 2015) will be identified through self-report of any one of the following four symptoms: abnormal vaginal discharge (unusual texture / color and/or more abundant discharge than normal), burning or itching of the genitalia, burning or itching when urinating, or having genital sores.
|
12 month follow-up
|
|
Hair cortisol
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
|
Hair cortisol will be assessed in a sub-sample of women in both intervention and comparison communities.
|
12 month follow-up
|
|
Sleep duration
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
|
Sleep duration will be assessed through a variety of self-report methods.
The investigators will adapt questions from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index that assess sleep duration over the past month: 1.
During this past month, how many hours of actual sleep did the participant usually get at night? (Herring et al., 2013).
The investigators will also ask the following questions: 1.
To the best of the participant's knowledge, what time did the participant go to bed last night?
2. To the best of the participant's knowledge, what time did the participant wake up this morning?
|
12 month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Oliver Cumming, Mr., London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Study Director: Kathleen O'Reilly, PhD, Texas A&M University
- Study Director: Seema Kulkarni, Society for the Promotion of Participatory Ecosystem Management (SOPPECOM)
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 11, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
April 15, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 4, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2019
Last Verified
April 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 6580 Norman
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
IPD Plan Description
De-identified data will be made available after completion of the study.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stress, Psychological
-
University of Thi-QarCompletedPsychological Stress | Academic StressIraq
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcRigshospitalet, Denmark; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfNot yet recruitingStress | Stress and Burnout | Stress BiomarkersGermany, Denmark
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteJohnson & JohnsonCompletedPsychological Stress in PregnancyUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedStressTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Baylor UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedAcute Psychological StressUnited States
-
Örebro University, SwedenCompletedPsychological Stress Due to SkydivingSweden
-
Universität Duisburg-EssenRecruitingStress | Burnout | Burnout Syndrome | Stress ResilienceGermany
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedStress | Emotional Stress | Psychological Stress | Social Stress | Life StressUnited States
-
Amrita Vishwa VidyapeethamAmrita Viswa VidyapeethamCompletedCovid Related Psychological StressIndia
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)Not yet recruitingPsychological Stress | Social Interaction
Clinical Trials on GSF Intervention
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...RecruitingEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaChina
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedNecrotizing Enterocolitis | Feeding Intolerance
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedMyelomaUnited States
-
Biolux Research Holdings, Inc.TerminatedOrthodontic Tooth MovementCanada
-
Nottingham Trent UniversityUnknownOverweight and ObesityUnited Kingdom
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedColorectal Carcinoma | Healthy Subject | Health Status UnknownUnited States
-
University of Southern DenmarkTrygFonden, DenmarkUnknownObesity | Overweight | Metabolic Syndrome | ChildrenDenmark
-
University of FloridaCompletedSensitivityUnited States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnCancer Survivor | Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy