The Sukhshanti Study: Effect of a Sanitation Intervention on Women's Health

April 2, 2019 updated by: University of Oklahoma

The Sukhshanti Study: a Controlled Before-and-after Mixed Methods Study of the Effect of a Sanitation Intervention on Women's Health in Bihar, India

The study will measure the impact of sanitation access on women and girl's social and emotional health, behaviors, and quality of life in rural India before and after a sanitation intervention compared to a comparison group that will receive the same intervention at a later date.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This mixed-methods, quasi-experimental study will evaluate the extent to which the Global Sanitation Fund (GSF) sanitation program in Bihar, India improves health and well-being among women and girls. Our study consists of a controlled before-and-after (CBA) study with an embedded ethnography.

Specific objectives are:

  • Measure the effect of the GSF intervention on sanitation-related psychosocial stress (SRPS), generalized psychosocial stress (PSS), perceived quality of life, hair cortisol, and urogenital health among women between the ages of 14 and 65.
  • Measure changes in sanitation adoption (e.g.: sanitation access and exclusive use) among individuals / households receiving the GSF intervention.
  • Document individual and community experiences with sanitation, intervention participation, and latrine coverage through ethnographic methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1275

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mumbai, India, 400 022
        • NEERMAN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 61 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • between 14 years to 65 years old
  • live in geographic area receiving GSF sanitation intervention in 2016
  • live in geographic areas matched to intervention communities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • less than 25 years old and not reached menarche
  • greater than 25 years old and never married
  • refusal to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GSF Sanitation intervention
This arm will receive the GSF sanitation intervention, a community-level sanitation intervention
Intervention utilizes community-based demand generation matched with supply side improvements to improve access and use of sanitation facilities in rural communities. This is complimented with multi-stakeholder engagement to promote cooperation and coordination with national, state, and local stakeholders.
No Intervention: Comparator
This arm will receive the GSF intervention in 2017 or later.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sanitation-Related Psychosocial Stress Scale (SRPS)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
The SRPS consist of 25 yes/no questions on experiences related to sanitation within the past thirty days of the date the SRPS is completed.This SRPS Scale specifically includes questions related to defecation, menstrual hygiene management, and post-defecation cleaning - the three behaviors that have the greatest contribution to sanitation-related psychosocial stress among women in India.
12 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS10)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
A measure for non-specific perceived stress. The PSS10 is the short form of the PSS and consist of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4). Scores are calculated by reverse scoring items with positive wording and summing across all items for a final score of 0 to 40. The PSS10 is not a diagnostic scale.
12 month follow-up
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
The K10 provides a measure of non-specific psychological distress and consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5). Scores are calculated by summing response across each item.
12 month follow-up
The WHO5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
The WHO5 consist of 5 items rated on a 6-point Likert scale (0 to 5) related to subjective well-being, vitality, and mood.
12 month follow-up
Self-reported urogenital infections
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
Urogenital infections, a health outcome linked to both menstrual hygiene management practices and sanitation access (Das et al., 2015) will be identified through self-report of any one of the following four symptoms: abnormal vaginal discharge (unusual texture / color and/or more abundant discharge than normal), burning or itching of the genitalia, burning or itching when urinating, or having genital sores.
12 month follow-up
Hair cortisol
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
Hair cortisol will be assessed in a sub-sample of women in both intervention and comparison communities.
12 month follow-up
Sleep duration
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
Sleep duration will be assessed through a variety of self-report methods. The investigators will adapt questions from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index that assess sleep duration over the past month: 1. During this past month, how many hours of actual sleep did the participant usually get at night? (Herring et al., 2013). The investigators will also ask the following questions: 1. To the best of the participant's knowledge, what time did the participant go to bed last night? 2. To the best of the participant's knowledge, what time did the participant wake up this morning?
12 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Oliver Cumming, Mr., London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Study Director: Kathleen O'Reilly, PhD, Texas A&M University
  • Study Director: Seema Kulkarni, Society for the Promotion of Participatory Ecosystem Management (SOPPECOM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6580 Norman

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data will be made available after completion of the study.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress, Psychological

Clinical Trials on GSF Intervention

Subscribe