Integrating Data, Algorithms and Clinical Reasoning for Surgical Risk Assessment (IDEALIST)

June 4, 2023 updated by: University of Florida

Integrating Data, Algorithms and Clinical Reasoning for Surgical Risk Assessment (IDEALIST)

Brief Summary: The goal of this study is to implement and test an intelligent perioperative system (IPS) that in real-time predicts risk for postoperative complications using routine clinical data collected in electronic health records. The accuracy of computer-generated risk scores will be compared to physician's risk scores for the same patients. Physicians will be also asked to provide the opinion regarding the computer-generated risk scores using interactive interface with the program. The information regarding the risk scores performance will be collected during the two 6-month periods. The accuracy of IPS and physicians will be compared at the end at those two time periods.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Postoperative complications significantly increase morbidity, mortality and cost after surgery. In the current clinical practice the prediction of the risk for developing complications after surgery is manly based on physicians' clinical judgment. The predictive accuracy of that judgment is limited and poorly studied. The investigators will design an intelligent perioperative system (IPS) as the set of computer software and algorithms that in real-time predict risk for postoperative complications using routine clinical data in electronic health records. The system is designed as the self-learning system with the ability to interact with physicians and solicit their feedback. This study will compare the clinical judgment of physicians with computer generated risk scores for patients undergoing major surgery. All surgeons and anesthesiologists at large single-center tertiary academic center will be recruited to participate in this study. The IPS system will be implemented in real time and will generate risk scores for postoperative complications for patients planned to undergo surgery performed by the physicians enrolled in the study. Physicians will be asked to provide their risk scores (using visual analog risk scale from 0-100) for the same patients before and after interacting with the IPS. They will also have the opportunity to review computer-generated risk scores and provide their feedback. The information will be collected during two six-month periods. At the end of each 6-months period predicted risk estimates will be compared to the true occurrence of the complications. Predictive performance of physicians' risk scores will be compared to IPS generated risk scores using the comparison between area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predicted values.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610-3003
        • Recruiting
        • UF Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Azra Bihorac, MD, MS
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Uf Health Jacksonville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All surgeons and anesthesiologists in the adult inpatient operative practices at the single-center academic tertiary center will be enrolled. Physicians in obstetric and pediatric practices will be excluded.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Surgeons and anesthesiologists working in adult inpatient operative practices.

Exclusion criteria:

Surgeons and anesthesiologists working in obstetric and pediatric practices.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Physicians

All surgeons and anesthesiologists at large single-center tertiary academic center will be recruited to participate in this study.

Intervention: Risk estimation prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery.

Physicians will be asked to provide their risk scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for postoperative complications prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery for the same patients that IPS is producing the scores. Physicians will provide scores both before and after reviewing the risk scores produced by the IPS.

Physicians will be asked to provide their risk scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for postoperative complications prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery for the same patients that IPS is producing the scores. Physicians will provide scores both before and after reviewing the risk scores produced by the IPS.

The IPS system will generate risk scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for postoperative complications prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery for patients taken care by the physicians enrolled in the study.

Intelligent Perioperative System (IPS)

Intelligent perioperative system (IPS) is designed as the set of computer softwares and algorithms that in real-time predict risk for postoperative complications using routine clinical data in electronic health records. The system is designed as the self-learning system with the ability to interact with physicians and solicit their feedback.

Intervention: Risk estimation prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery.

The IPS system will generate risk scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for postoperative complications prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery for patients taken care by the physicians enrolled in the study.

Physicians will be asked to provide their risk scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for postoperative complications prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery for the same patients that IPS is producing the scores. Physicians will provide scores both before and after reviewing the risk scores produced by the IPS.

The IPS system will generate risk scores (ranging from 0 to 100) for postoperative complications prior to surgery and immediately after the surgery for patients taken care by the physicians enrolled in the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of risk estimates
Time Frame: At the end of six months study period.
At the end of each 6-months period predicted risk estimates will be compared to the true occurrence of the complications. Predictive performance of physicians' will be compared to IPS by comparing the area under the receiver-operating curves (AUC) for risk estimates.
At the end of six months study period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of risk estimates
Time Frame: At the end of six months study period.
At the end of each 6-months period predicted risk estimates will be compared to the true occurrence of the complications. Predictive performance of physicians' will be compared to IPS by comparing the sensitivity and specificity for risk estimates.
At the end of six months study period.
Positive and negative predictive values
Time Frame: At the end of six months study period.
At the end of each 6-months period predicted risk estimates will be compared to the true occurrence of the complications. Predictive performance of physicians' will be compared to IPS by comparing the Positive and negative predictive values for risk estimates.
At the end of six months study period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Azra Bihorac, MD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

April 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB201600262-N
  • R01GM110240 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All deidentified data will be governed by University of Florida Integrated Data Repository. The investigators will comply with local, state, and federal laws, such as the Privacy Rule, a Federal regulation under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The investigators will follow the general NIH data sharing guidance and provide a data sharing plan to be reviewed and approved by the relevant NIGMS Program Officer.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on Risk estimation

3
Subscribe