G-CSF+Decitabine+BUCY vs BUCY Conditioning Regimen for RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS Undergoing Allo-HSCT

January 30, 2022 updated by: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor+Decitabine+Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide vs Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Patients With RAEB-1, RAEB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) appears to be an efficient tool to cure refractory anemia with excess blasts-1 (RAEB-1), refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 (RAEB-2) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). At present, the best conditioning regimen for RAEB-1, RAEB-2 and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. In this prospective randomized controlled study, the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+ Decitabine + BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Allo-HSCT appears to be an efficient tool to cure patients with MDS and AML secondary to MDS. At present, the best conditioning regimen for MDS and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. BUCY conditioning regimen is the standard myeloablative regimen for MDS and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT. However, it appears to have higher relapse rate. To reduce the relapse rate, decitabine is added in the conditioning regimen. In this prospective randomized controlled study, the safety and efficacy of G-CSF + Decitabine + BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

202

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT
  • 14-65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
  • Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: G-CSF + Decitabine + BUCY
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT ,Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor(G-CSF)+Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5-10ug/kg/day on days -17 and -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF);Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 and -10; Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4;Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.
Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
Decitabine was administered at 20mg/m2/day on days -14 and -10.
G-CSF was administered at 5-10 ug/kg/day on days -17 and -10. When white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF.
Active Comparator: BUCY
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT ,BUCY conditioning regimen was Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4;Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.
Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
relapse rate
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
transplant-related mortality (TRM)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Busulfan (BU)

3
Subscribe