BuCY vs TBICY Conditioning Regimen for Standard-risk ALL Undergoing Allo-HSCT

March 30, 2022 updated by: Qifa Liu, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Total Body Irradiation Plus Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Standard-risk Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Undergoing HLA-matched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) appears to be an efficient tool to cure standard-risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in first CR (CR1) but the choice between BU-based or TBI-based conditioning regimens still remains controversial. In this study, the safety and efficacy of BUCY and TBICY myeloablative conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for ALL in CR1 are evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Allo-HSCT appears to be an efficient tool to cure standard-risk ALL in CR1. The conditioning regimen with BUCY or TBICY is considered as the standard myeloablative regimen for ALL in CR1, but the choice between BU-based or TBI-based conditioning regimen still remains controversial.In order to analyze the impact of conditioning regimen on long-term survival and relapse, in this study, the safety and efficacy of BUCY and TBICY myeloablative conditioning regimens in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for ALL in CR1 are evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

550

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510515
        • Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Standard-risk ALL
  • Achieving CR1
  • Undergoing HLA-matched allo-HSCT (related or unrelated)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
  • Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BUCY
For standard-risk ALL undergoing HLA-matched allo-HSCT,BUCY conditioning regimen was BU 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4;CY 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.
Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
Active Comparator: TBICY
For standard-risk ALL undergoing HLA-matched allo-HSCT,TBICY conditioning regimen was 4.5 Gy TBI/day on days -5 and -4;CY 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.
Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
Total Body Irradiation was given 4.5 Gy TBI/day on days -5 and -4.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
leukemia relapse rate
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
transplant-related mortality (TRM)
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Busulfan (BU)

3
Subscribe