Pain Processing in Adults With Migraines

Primary Objective of this study: To assess experimental heat pain responses (pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, pain catastrophizing, emotional reactivity) in migraineurs vs. healthy controls.

The current tools of migraine pain measurement are inadequate to distinguish the overall burden of suffering, as there is an over reliance on a single numerical pain score to represent the entire pain experience. Measuring and targeting the affective component, in addition to the sensory component of pain, may capture this discrepancy in disease burden. The affective component of migraine pain may be just as important as the sensory component to target and measure since it significantly impacts outcomes, disability, and has therapeutic treatment implications.

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a robust lab paradigm (not a clinical experience) that delivers one painful noxious thermal stimuli and asks for simultaneous pain intensity and pain unpleasantness scores. By using this in the research, investigators will be able to differentiate the sensory (pain quality-what the pain feels like) from the affective (how awful/unpleasant the pain feels) components of experimental pain in normal controls vs. migrainuers.

No previous studies have evaluated differences in experimental pain intensity vs. pain unpleasantness in migraineurs vs. controls. As migraine pain uniquely involves many altered sensory phenomenon (e.g., photophobia, phonophobia), it cannot be assumed that responses to experimental pain in migraine will be the same as other clinical pain syndromes. Further, different clinical pain syndromes have distinct responses to pain intensity vs. pain unpleasantness.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators will conduct a cross-sectional study in migraineurs (interictally, i.e., between migraine attacks) and healthy controls to compare responses to experimental heat pain intensity and unpleasantness and correlate these results to differences in emotional reactivity and pain catastrophizing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

121

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Inclusion criteria for Healthy Controls:

    • ≥18yo;
  2. Inclusion Criteria for Migraineurs:

    • ≥18yo with >1 yr of migraines and currently 4-20 days/month with migraines, although no migraine within 48 hrs of study visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any major unstable medical/psychiatric illness (e.g., hospitalization within 90 days, suicide risk, etc.)
  2. Severe clinical depression/anxiety
  3. Chronic pain condition (e.g., fibromyalgia, migraines for healthy controls, etc.) or sensory abnormalities (e.g., neuropathy, Raynaud's, etc.)
  4. Diagnosis of medication overuse headache or chronic migraine.
  5. Migraineurs will be studied after being headache-free for at least 48 hours (interictally).
  6. Participants may be currently taking migraine medications, as long as they do not have a diagnosis of medication overuse headache.
  7. Pregnant subjects will be excluded from all portions of the study due to possible unknown risks of frankly noxious stimuli.
  8. Due to unknown risks and potential harm to the unborn fetus, sexually active women of childbearing potential must use a reliable method of birth control while participating in this study
  9. Volunteers with no pain ratings to frankly noxious stimuli (temperatures > 49°C) or excessive responses to threshold temperatures (~43°C)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Migraine
Participants with migraines will complete one study visit where they will complete several questionnaires and will also complete Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements. They must be migraine-free during the visit and no migraine within 48 hrs of study visit
Before the experimental session, participants will use REDCap to complete several questionnaires used to assess outcomes.
Investigators will administer noxious thermal stimulation to assess pain threshold temperatures and assess responses to pain on measures of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Healthy Controls
Healthy Controls will complete one study visit where they will complete several questionnaires and will complete Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements.
Before the experimental session, participants will use REDCap to complete several questionnaires used to assess outcomes.
Investigators will administer noxious thermal stimulation to assess pain threshold temperatures and assess responses to pain on measures of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heat Pain Intensity coefficient and intercept from stimulus response curve
Time Frame: One visit
Using the logarithmic equation: log (VAS pain ratings)=log (t - 35) * coefficient + intercept where t represents stimulus temperature, we will generate stimulus-response curves for each subject
One visit
Heat Pain Unpleasantness coefficient and intercept from stimulus response curve
Time Frame: One visit
Using the logarithmic equation: log (VAS pain ratings)=log (t - 35) * coefficient + intercept where t represents stimulus temperature, we will generate stimulus-response curves for each subject
One visit
Pain Catastophizing score
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Pain Catastrophizing instrument
One Visit
Difficulty in Emotions Regulation score
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Difficulty in Emotions Regulation score
One Visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heat Pain Threshold Temperature
Time Frame: One Visit
Temperature of heat pain threshold
One Visit
Anxiety
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument
One Visit
Depression
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Patient Health related questionnaire-depression module (PHQ-9) instrument
One Visit
Mindfulness
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Five Factor Mindfulness (FFM) instrument
One Visit
Stress
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) instrument
One Visit
Hope
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Herth Hope Index instrument
One Visit
Optimism
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Life Orientation Test instrument
One Visit
Social Connectedness
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Social Connectedness Scale instrument
One Visit
Flourishing
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Flourishing scale instrument
One Visit
Resilience
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the Brief Resilience scale instrument
One Visit
Sleep
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the NIH Promis Measure of sleep disturbance instrument
One Visit
Global Health
Time Frame: One Visit
Score on the 1st question of the NIH Promis Global Health measure
One Visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 24, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 16, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 16, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Please contact the study principal investigator, Dr. Rebecca Wells rewells@wakehealth.edu, for the study protocol and other information

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraines

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires

3
Subscribe