- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02752373
A Health Economic Study Evaluating the Brain Sentinel® GTC Seizure Detection and Information Systems Impact on Epilepsy and Healthcare Utilization
March 16, 2017 updated by: Brain Sentinel
This is an open label prospective study of the impact on healthcare utilization of a surface Electromyography (sEMG) based seizure detection system for detecting Generalized Tonic-Clonic (GTC) Seizures.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The Brain Sentinel® GTC Seizure Detection and Information System is an ambulatory system designed to continuously monitor and perform real-time analysis of surface electromyography (sEMG) data to detect GTC seizures and to provide an alarm to alert caregivers within 30 seconds of bilateral, appendicular, tonic extension that a seizure is occurring.
The System is for recording and storing sEMG data, which is subsequently reviewed by a trained healthcare professional in the outpatient clinical setting.
The Brain Sentinel® GTC Seizure Detection and Information System is intended for real time monitoring of pediatric and adult patients who have an arm circumference ranging from at least 16 cm to no greater than 51 cm at the biceps.
It may be used in the home or healthcare facilities for real-time monitoring during the day, night, or for continuous monitoring, including during the titration of, or the withdrawal from anti-epileptic drugs.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
5
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
- Nationwide Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
2 years to 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
People with a history of GTC seizures, either primary GTC or partial onset seizures with secondary generalization
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has a history of GTC seizures, either primary GTC or partial onset seizures with secondary generalization
- Male or female greater than 2 years of age
- Has an upper arm circumference which is adequate for proper fit of the EMG monitor (at least 16-51 cm)
- Be able to tolerate wearing the device on the upper arm
- Can understand and sign written informed consent, or will have a parent or a legally authorized representative (LAR) who can do so, prior to the performance of any study assessments
- Subject and/or Primary Caregiver must be competent to follow all study procedures.
- Is able to read, speak and understand English
- At least 2 or more Emergency Department visits in the previous 12 months for seizure related care
Exclusion Criteria:
- The subject is homeless or in a home without a power supply.
- The subject is allergic to adhesives or any component of the electrode patch assembly.
- The subject self-reports that she is pregnant or planning to become pregnant while using the device.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Other
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluate the change in associated healthcare costs for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate the change in associated healthcare costs for patients 12 months prior as compared to 2 months and each 6 months of system use and compared to a similar population of epilepsy patients.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system in the form of the change of the number of Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
The change in number of Emergency Department visits will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system in the form of the change in number of inpatient hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
The change in number of inpatient hospitalizations will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system in the form of the change in number of EEGs
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
The change in number of EEGs will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system in the form of the change in number of Long Term Video EEG Monitoring (LTM)
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
The change in number of Long Term Video EEG Monitoring (LTM) will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system in the form of the change in number of outpatient clinic visits in patients
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
The change in number of outpatient clinic visits in patients will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system in the form of the change in number of no-shows and/or patient cancellations
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
The change in number of no-shows and/or patient cancellations will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system by assessing the change in seizure frequency for each type (reported as per month)
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Change in seizure frequency for each type (reported as per month) will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system by assessing change in epilepsy etiology (including, but not limited to a new diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic spells)
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Change in epilepsy etiology (including, but not limited to a new diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic spells) will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system by assessing clarification of diagnosis
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Clarification of diagnosis, if applicable, will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Evaluate impact on healthcare utilization for patients with a GTC seizure detection and information system by assessing change in epilepsy treatment
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Change in epilepsy treatment will be compared between the 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
To evaluate the impact of epilepsy on families and patients ages > 11 receiving Brain Sentinel® System
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Assess data captured on Impact on Families questionnaire collected at baseline, 2 months, and each 6 month time period during use of the device.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
To evaluate the change in quality of life for patients ages > 11 receiving Brain Sentinel® System
Time Frame: 12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Assess data captured on Quality of Life in Epilepsy questionnaire collected at baseline, 2 months, and each 6 month time period during use of the device.
|
12 months prior to receiving the device and at 2 months and after 6 months of device use
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anup Patel, MD, Nationwide Children's Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 26, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
April 27, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 20, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 16, 2017
Last Verified
March 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HE-1.5-03.2016
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Epilepsy
-
NaviFUS CorporationTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Resistant | Intractable Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Drug Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Refractory | Epilepsy, Intractable | Medication Resistant EpilepsyTaiwan
-
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation...Active, not recruitingEpilepsies, Partial | Intractable Epilepsy | Focal Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy Intractable | Epilepsy in Children | Epilepsy, FocalUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaTerminatedJuvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy | Childhood Absence Epilepsy | Juvenile Absence EpilepsyCanada
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Neuroelectrics CorporationRecruitingEpilepsy | Seizures | Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic | Epilepsy in Children | Seizures, Focal | Focal SeizureSpain, United States, France, Belgium
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedEpilepsy | Generalized Epilepsy | Focal EpilepsyNorway
-
UCB Pharma SACompletedEpilepsy, Tonic-clonicPoland, Sweden, Hungary, Czechia
-
UCB PharmaCompletedEpilepsy, Tonic-clonic
-
University Hospital, LilleUnknownFocal Epilepsy | Epilepsy IntractableFrance
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingPeking University; Beijing Tiantan Hospital; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingEpilepsy, Drug ResistantChina
Clinical Trials on Brain Sentinel Seizure Detection and Information System
-
Brain SentinelUnknown
-
Brain SentinelCompletedEpilepsy | Generalized Tonic-Clonic SeizuresUnited States
-
Brain SentinelCompletedEpilepsy | Generalized Tonic-Clonic SeizuresUnited States
-
Brain SentinelUnknownEpilepsy, Motor Partial | Psychogenic SeizuresUnited States
-
Faculty of Medicine, SousseCompletedBreast Cancer | Sentinel Lymph Node
-
Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisUnknown
-
Region SkaneNot yet recruitingLymphedema | Endometrial Cancer | Sentinel Lymph NodeSweden
-
Brain SentinelNot yet recruiting
-
Brain SentinelNot yet recruiting