Long-term Effects of Visual Spatial Working Memory Training Program Performed at Preschool Age in Very Preterm Infants With Visual Spatial Working Memory Deficit. A Randomized Controlled Trial (EPIREMED)

Prematurity tends to increase in France in recent years and more children born extremely premature infants survive. If severe impairments have stabilized, the majority of former extremely premature children have neuropsychological disorders and moderate appearance behavior disorder, but with a significant impact both family, school and social persisting into adulthood.

Executive functions (EF), in general, and working memory (MT), in particular, are frequently altered in older children preterm infants compared to controls born at term.

The identification process of loss in certain diseases, as well as improving knowledge of brain functioning, and development with the possibility of neuronal plasticity has led research teams to develop intervention programs focused on process cognitive qualified of "remediation" cognitive (RC). Schematically, the RC is defined as a rehabilitation or altered cognitive functions. MT can be improved by encouraging the operation of the spots mental stimulant. These programs are effective on MT but do not have the expected impact on other FE, language or nonverbal functions (visuospatial). The functional benefit of cognitive remediation remains controversial.

Improving mental functions untrained as nonverbal MT, attention and secondarily learning is possible but still unproven on wide population. Similarly, randomized trials are needed to test this type of cognitive remediation among preschoolers old very premature.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

166

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69677
        • University Hospital of Lyon
      • Caen, France, 14033
        • University Hospital of Caen Normandie
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, France, 91 106
        • Sud Francilien Hospital
      • Grenoble, France, 38 043
        • University hospital of Grenoble
      • Marseille, France, 13354
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • University Hospital of Montpellier
      • Nancy, France, 54035
        • Regional University Hospital of Nancy
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • University Hospital of Nantes
      • Nice, France, 06300
        • University Hospital of Nice
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • University Hospital of Nîmes
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • AP- HP - Armand Trousseau Hospital
      • Reims, France, 51092
        • University Hospital of Reims
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • University Hospital of Rouen
      • St Etienne, France, 42055
        • University Hospital of Saint-Etienne
      • Strasbourg, France, 67200
        • Regional University Hospital of Strasbourg
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • University Hospital of Toulouse
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • University Hospital of Tour

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Already included in the study EPIPAGE 2, born between 24 and 34 weeks' GA (gestational amenorrhea),
  • Children aged 5 to 6 years,
  • Children exhibiting a total intellectual quotient >70 from the WPPSI IV (during the 5-year assessment in EPIPAGE 2),
  • Children having a visuo-spatial Working Memory impairment defined by a working memory index <85 from the WPPSI IV,
  • Children with parents (or legal guardians) authorizing participation in the study and a signed informed consent form,
  • Children affiliated with medical insurance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with severe cerebral palsy, based on the Gross Motor Function (GMFCS score >2) and Bimanual Fine Motor Function (BFMF >2) classification system (Elvrum AG 2015, Marois P 2015),
  • Children with blindness or amblyopia, defined by a visual acuity <3 (during the 5-year assessment in EPIPAGE 2),
  • Children with deafness, as defined by a prescribed hearing aid,
  • Children with chromosomal disorder or autistic syndrome,
  • Children included in the EPILANG study protocol (an ancillary project to EPIPAGE),
  • Children who do not speak French
  • Children with parents having no internet connection,
  • Triplets.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cognitive remediation parents
a computer program online re-educating the working memory is completed by the parents and the child. The child made a series of interactive exercises accompanied by parents or a practitioner. The exercises are adapted automatically and individually to the performance at each session.
Placebo Comparator: Remediation standard
A speech therapy and / or academic support is realized.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increase of the measuring index visuospatial
Time Frame: 18 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
This index consists of two subtests : block design and object assembly. The average score is 100 with a standard deviation of 15.
18 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the working memory
Time Frame: 18 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
administering the questionnaire Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI IV)
18 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Assessment of intellectual functioning
Time Frame: 8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
award of global IQ
8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
evaluation of neuropsychological development of children
Time Frame: 8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
award of Neuropsychological Assessment test (NEPSY)
8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Evaluation of language and skills
Time Frame: 8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
passing the test Communicate, Learn to Read and Write (KEY)
8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Rating behavior
Time Frame: 8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
award of Goodman questionnaire (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ))
8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Evaluation of parental anxiety
Time Frame: 8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
award of Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire
8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Assessing the quality of a child's life
Time Frame: 8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Quality of Life Questionnaire
8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Evaluation of Education
Time Frame: 8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion
Evaluation of Education is evaluated by the global adaptation school score (GSA) survey
8 months (more or less 2 months) post inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Urielle DESALBRES, Director, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 29, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

May 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-01
  • 2016-A00122-49 (Registry Identifier: ID RCB)
  • RCAPHM16_0010 (Other Identifier: APHM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Children Born Extremely Premature

Clinical Trials on computerized cognitive remediation program

3
Subscribe