- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02766738
Improving Mobility in Residential Aged Care
Improving Mobility in Residential Aged Care: Comparing the Benefits of Two Resistance Exercise Programs
This study aims to test which of three exercise programs, previously demonstrated valuable for residential aged care adults, has the greatest benefit for walking speed and the spatiotemporal parameters that define it. The programs to be included are:
- The GrACE program and
- The GrACE plus Gait specific training.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will employ a non-randomised controlled design in which three different 24-week exercise programs and a non-exercising control group will be compared in the residential aged care (RAC) setting. The three programs are the GrACE and the GrACE plus a gait specific training program.
Data Collection
~40 participants from two RAC facilities will be recruited into the study. This number of participants will provide 80% statistical power to identify moderate effect size between group differences on the primary outcome measures. The control group will be drawn from each of the RAC facility approached receiving exercise treatment. Participation will be informed by a discussion with the facilities Service Manager about the eligibility of participants and a medical history screen undertaken. All participants will provide informed written consent prior to participation.
Participants in the exercise group will perform twice weekly training for 24 weeks. Data will be collected at 0 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks in the control and exercise groups.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Tweed Heads, New South Wales, Australia, 2486
- Darlington RSL Care
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged over 65 years
- residing in a RAC facility
- able to walk with a walker and/or walking stick or can self-ambulate for the test (including those who have had knee and hip replacements)
- can provide informed consent (Self- or by proxy).
Exclusion Criteria:
- end-stage terminal and/or life expectancy <6-months (ethical reasons)
- two person transfer or unable to self-ambulate (increased falls risk)
- unable to communicate or follow instructions (personal needs beyond the scope of this project)
- dangerous behaviours (endanger the client or research staff).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
All participants assigned to the control group will be given the option to engage in other activities that were offered by the facility during the 24-week intervention period.
However, no specific resistance exercises were offered in these activities.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: GrACE program
Participants in the exercise group will perform twice weekly training for 24 weeks.
In brief, the program will include weight-bearing exercises and a range of seated, non-resisted upper- and lower-body dynamic and reaching movements.
The following-weight bearing and resistance exercises: chair stands, chair dips, calf raises and hip flexor/abdominal lifts, trunk twists, and bicep curl and shoulder press.
In total the sessions will be 45 minutes twice weekly.
|
to compare with the GrACE + gait programme in RAC, as well as the secondary objective of measuring the programme benefits on gait speed, sit to stand and handgrip strength against the intervention and control group
|
EXPERIMENTAL: GrACE + gait program
GrACE program as mentioned above plus focus on gait specific training will be one-hour training sessions for 24 weeks.
Gait exercises will be a combination of exercises: heel and toe raises, stepping in different directions, single leg stand¬ing, step-ups, and task-specific balance work (e.g.
reaching outward from the base of support while standing, sitting, and standing and turning).
Gait exercises will be upgraded by: 1) reducing hand support and/or 2) narrowing the base of support, and/or 3) introducing a cognitive challenge (e.g.
counting backwards while performing exercise) or perform¬ing exercise with the eyes closed.
|
to compare with the GrACE programme in RAC, as well as the secondary objective of measuring the programme benefits on gait speed, sit to stand and handgrip strength against the intervention and control group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Gait speed and spatio-temporal parameters (in a wider variety of walking tasks)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
Gait speed and spatio-temporal parameters will be recorded via the GaitMat II system (Manufacturer is EQInc; Model is GaitMat II), which required participants to walk across a level pressure mat system 3.66 m (11.91 ft.) long (McDonough et al. 2001).
Participants completed the trials at their preferred (habitual) walking (gait) speed.
All measures will be initiated from a standing start 2 m (6.56 ft.) from the GaitMat II platform as suggested by Kressig and Beauchet (Kressig & Beauchet 2006) to reduce the effect that acceleration may have on gait speed.
Three conditions will be measured which include normal walking, along with two dual tasks.
These dual tasks include: (i) walking while carrying a glass of water in the participants preferred hand, (ii) walking while counting backwards from 30.
Each of these gait conditions will be performed for three repetitions in a randomised block order (Taylor, 2012).
|
change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sit to stand performance
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
In the sit-to-stand measure, participants sat and stood to a full standing position from a chair as many times as possible in 30 seconds whilst keeping their arms crossed against their chest (Millor 2013).
Measurement units = repetitions in 30 seconds
|
change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
handgrip strength
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
Upper body muscle function was measured by isometric handgrip strength and sit-to-stand performance, respectively.
When performing the handgrip strength assessments, participants were seated, instructed to keep their elbow at 90° and asked to squeeze a handgrip dynamometer (Sammons Preston Roylan, Bolingbrook, IL) to their maximum ability for a period of up to five seconds (Mathiowetz 2002).
Three trials were performed with the subject's dominant hand with one-minute rest between trials and the best result used for analysis (Roberts 2011).
Measurement units = kilograms
|
change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
Body Composition
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
measure the volume of lean body mass (kg) and fat mass (kg) and the skeletal muscle index will be calculated using the BIA.
|
change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-EL)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
The EQ-5D-EL descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three levels: no problems, some problems and extreme problems.
|
change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
Sarcopenia status (SARC-F)
Time Frame: change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
The SARC-F questionnaire is a rapid diagnostic test used to screen individuals for sarcopenia.
There are five SARC components: strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls.
The scores range from 0 to 2 points for each of the five components, allowing a total score of 0-10.
Studies have suggested that a score equal to or greater than four is predictive of sarcopenia and poor health outcomes.
|
change from baseline to 24 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Justin Keogh, PhD, Bond University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mathiowetz V. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int. 2002;9(3):201-9. doi: 10.1002/oti.165.
- McDonough AL, Batavia M, Chen FC, Kwon S, Ziai J. The validity and reliability of the GAITRite system's measurements: A preliminary evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):419-25. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.19778.
- Kressig RW, Beauchet O; European GAITRite Network Group. Guidelines for clinical applications of spatio-temporal gait analysis in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006 Apr;18(2):174-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03327437.
- Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.
- Millor N, Lecumberri P, Gomez M, Martinez-Ramirez A, Izquierdo M. An evaluation of the 30-s chair stand test in older adults: frailty detection based on kinematic parameters from a single inertial unit. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Aug 1;10:86. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-86.
- Taylor ME, Delbaere K, Mikolaizak AS, Lord SR, Close JC. Gait parameter risk factors for falls under simple and dual task conditions in cognitively impaired older people. Gait Posture. 2013 Jan;37(1):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.024. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
- Hewitt J, Refshauge KM, Goodall S, Henwood T, Clemson L. Does progressive resistance and balance exercise reduce falls in residential aged care? Randomized controlled trial protocol for the SUNBEAM program. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Feb 21;9:369-76. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S53931. eCollection 2014.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- RO1823
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Geriatric Disorder
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUnknown
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompleted
-
Nantes University HospitalCompleted
-
University of ValenciaUnknownGeriatric DisorderSpain
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityShatin HospitalUnknown
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterUnknownGeriatric DisorderIsrael
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompletedGeriatric Disorder | Mobil UnitFrance
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedCancer | Geriatric Disorder | Patient FallUnited States
-
University of AarhusCompleted
-
Aarhus University HospitalVIA University College; Institute of public health, department of nursing sciences...CompletedGeriatric DisorderDenmark
Clinical Trials on GrACE program
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of Missouri, Kansas CityCompleted
-
Saint Joseph's University, PhiladelphiaRecruitingStroke | Cognitive Impairment | Cognitive Change | Neurological Injury | Activity, MotorUnited States
-
University of the Sciences in PhiladelphiaRecruitingStroke | Cognitive Change | Neuroplasticity | Dual Task | Exercise InterventionUnited States
-
National Institute on Aging (NIA)Wishard Health Services; Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable TrustCompletedAging | Functional DeclineUnited States
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCompletedBreast Neoplasms | Neoplasm MetastasisUnited States
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterHospice Foundation of America; John and Wauna Harman FoundationCompletedTerminal Illness | Advance Care Planning | Advance Directives | Vulnerable PopulationsUnited States
-
Lady Davis InstituteNot yet recruitingDepression | Quality of Life | Stress | Anxiety | Loneliness
-
Massachusetts General HospitalPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Vanderbilt University Medical... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingHealthy Aging | Health Care Utilization | Health-Related Behavior
-
Alfasigma S.p.A.CompletedCrohn's DiseaseIsrael, Italy, Russian Federation, Poland, Germany, France, Hungary
-
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San Francisco; Stanford University; California Initiative...Enrolling by invitationStress | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Stress, Physiological | Stress ReactionUnited States