Tele-Health Electronic Monitoring to Reduce Post Discharge Complications and Surgical Site Infections (THEM)

April 15, 2019 updated by: Albeir Mousa, CAMC Health System

Tele-Health Electronic Monitoring to Reduce Post Discharge Complications and Surgical Site Infections Following Arterial Revascularization With Groin Incision

Abstract:

It is intuitive that post discharge surgical complications are associated with increased patient dissatisfaction, and directly associated with an increase in medical expenditures. It is also easy to make the connection that many post hospital discharge surgical complications including surgical site infections could be influenced or exacerbated by patient co-morbidities. The authors of a recent study reported that female gender, obesity, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, coronary artery disease, critical limb ischemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyspnea, and neurologic disease were all of among significant predictors of surgical site infections after vascular reconstruction was performed. The main concern for optimal patient care especially in geographically isolated areas of West Virginia is to have early, expeditious, and prompt diagnosis of early surgical site infection with subsequent indicated interventions. This theme will lead to patient satisfaction, minimizing third party interventions and decrease the total cost associated with these complications. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to believe that monitoring using telehealth technology and managing the general health care patients receive after a hospital vascular intervention will improve overall health and reduce post-operative complications.

Aims/Objectives:

1. The primary objective of the current project is to compare early and late outcomes for patients who receive post discharge health care monitoring (which includes using Telehealth electronic monitoring; THEM) to patients who receive standard of care (SOC) and routine discharge instructions and no monitoring.

Methods:

  1. Randomize patients who are scheduled to have revascularization interventions with groin incisions to receive either telehealth electronic health care monitoring or normal standard of follow-up care.
  2. Follow patients for 4 weeks, record any 30-day hospital readmissions or complications. In addition, have participants complete the follow-up survey questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with any planned vascular procedures with cut-down access to the groin and treated by one of the Charleston Area Medical Center -Vascular Surgeons in the Vascular Center (VCOE) will be consented and enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. do not plan to do follow-up visit at the VCOE;
  2. history of dementia;
  3. do not have home internet service with WIFI or live outside of the provided cell coverage area (cell coverage will be provided for patients without internet WIFI).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: THEM
Patients receive telehealth electronic health care monitoring.
Patients in the intervention group (THEM) will receive a tablet computer and home monitoring medical devices with sensors to transmit the information to a central website that will be monitored by care managers. Medical devices will include weight scales, blood pressure cuffs and blood glucometers. Clinical care mangers will remotely monitor the patients and all electronic readings. Clinical care managers will call or send text messages to the patients based on alerts generated by the tele-health monitoring system.
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard of Care (SOC)
Patients receive normal standard of follow-up care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-Day Readmission (Any)
Time Frame: 30-day
Yes/No was patient readmitted? Patients were monitored for 30 days to see if they were re-admitted to the hospital for any reason. Percentage of patients with 30-day readmission.
30-day
30-day Wound Readmission
Time Frame: 30-day
Yes/No was patient readmitted for wound infection? Patients were monitored for 30 days to see if they were re-admitted to the hospital for wound infection. Percentage of patients with 30-day readmission for wound infection.
30-day
Access Site/Wound Infections.
Time Frame: 30-day
Yes/No did patient any access site or would infections? Access site wounds for the patients were monitored for 30 days for any wound infections.
30-day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Difference Between Baseline and 30-day Quality of Life (Short-Form 8) Physical Summary Score
Time Frame: 30-day
The Difference between baseline and 30-day quality of life (Short-Form 8) Physical summary T-scores. The short-form (SF-8) Health Survey is an 8-item survey designed to measure quality of life. The SF-8 has 8 questions that first measures eight ordinal items (i.e., 1-5 Likert scale): general health, physical health functioning, role physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health and emotional roles. Summing the responses of the 8 items can be used to report an overall measure of physical and mental functioning. The raw Likert scale scores are converted to normalized standard T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Measuring physical and mental health both before and after an intervention, as continuous summary scores can indicate better self-reported quality of life with higher scores. A difference score of 0 would indicate no change, while a larger positive difference score would indicate an increase in self-reported quality of life.
30-day
Patient Satisfaction as Measured by the General Satisfaction Sub-scale of the Short-Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ18)
Time Frame: 30-day
Patients' satisfaction was compared using the General Satisfaction sub-scale of the Short-Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ18). The PSQ-18 contains 18 items (questions) that can measure seven dimensions of satisfaction: general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with doctor, and accessibility and convenience. Responses to the PSQ-18 require a selection on a Likert scale from 1 Strongly Agree to 5 Strongly Disagree with some of the questions worded in such a manner that agreement reflects greater satisfaction (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 15 & 18). These responses were "re-coded" in order for a larger number to reflect greater satisfaction. Next, two individual items (3 and 17) are summed and averaged to produce the general satisfaction sub-scale. A larger number reflects greater satisfaction, with a range of 1 to 5.
30-day
Number of Participants With Home Nursing Visits
Time Frame: 30-day
Yes/No did the patient have (any) home nursing visits during the 30-day follow-up period.
30-day
Stroke
Time Frame: 30-day
Yes/No did patient have a stroke. Patients were monitored for 30 days for stroke.
30-day
Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: 30-day
Yes/No did patient have myocardial infarction. Patients were monitored for 30 days for myocardial infarction.
30-day
Death
Time Frame: 30-day
Yes/No Did patient die? Patients for monitored for 30 days for death.
30-day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Vascular Disease

Clinical Trials on Tele-Health Electronic Monitoring (THEM)

Subscribe