Transcranial Brain Stimulation and Its Underlying Neural Mechanisms as a Novel Treatment for Auditory Hallucinations

May 18, 2026 updated by: Marco Hirnstein, University of Bergen
The present study aims to investigate whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces auditory hallucinations in patients with psychosis. In addition, the neuronal changes of tDCS will be examined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The majority of patients with psychosis experience hallucinations, particularly auditory hallucinations are frequent. The hallucinations often leads to massive distress and impairments in social functioning and sometimes even order patients to commit acts of violence against themselves or others. The standard treatment for auditory hallucinations is antipsychotic medication. However, side-effects can be severe and about 25-30% of the patients do not respond to the medication. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which modulates cortical excitability in a pain-free free with mild transient adverse effects, if any. Typically, cortical excitability underneath the anode is boosted while cathodal stimulation has inhibitory effects. Previous studies found that 2 daily sessions of 20 min tDCS for five subsequent days may reduce auditory hallucinations. Investigators want to further assess the efficacy of tDCS in sample that is large enough to detect medium to large effects. In addition, investigators want to investigate the neural mechanisms that underlie the tDCS treatment by examining various neuroimaging parameters before, immediately after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hordaland
      • Bergen, Hordaland, Norway, 5009
        • University of Bergen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder or other psychotic disorder
  • Frequent auditory hallucinations (at least 5 times a week).
  • Patients are on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication (which can also be zero) for at least 2 weeks.
  • Mentally competent for informed consent.
  • Provided informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metal objects in or around the head that cannot be removed (i.e. cochlear implant, surgical clips, piercing)
  • History of seizures, or a history of seizures in first-degree relatives.
  • History of eye trauma with a metal object or professional metal workers
  • History of brain surgery, brain infarction, head trauma, cerebrovascular accident, broken skull, brain tumour, heart disease, cardiac pacemaker.
  • Skin disease on the scalp on the position of the tDCS electrodes
  • Coercive treatment based on a judicial ruling
  • Pregnancy in female patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: real tDCS
DC Stimulator PLUS (NeuroConn) The real tDCS condition comprises two daily sessions of 20 min tDCS, separated by a minimum break of 3h, for five consecutive days. Anodal and cathodal tDCS will be applied with 2mA to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (a point midway between F3 and FP1) and the left peri-Sylvian region (a point midway between T3 and P3), respectively. Electrode size is 7cm x 5cm.
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
DC Stimulator PLUS (NeuroConn) The sham condition is identical to the "real tDCS" condition except that after 40s of tDCS stimulation is going to be reduced to a small pulse every 550msec (110 μA over 15 msec) through the remainder of the 20 minute period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Self-report measure for severity of hallucinations; consists of seven items; Sum can range from 2 to 41; higher values indicate more severe hallucinations
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Hallucination Change Scale (HCS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment
Measure for changes in severity of auditory hallucinations; participants rated in percent how much their symptoms had improved (or worsened). The range is thus -100 (symptoms reduced by 100%) to +100 (symptoms worsened by 100%)
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Positive Sum Score; conducted by clinical rater; consists of 10 items, range 7-49; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Stroop Task
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Measure of executive functioning, Stroop condition #3 in seconds; higher values indicate longer task duration and worse performance
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Trailmaking Test B
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Measure of visuomotor speed
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Apathy Evaluation Scale
Time Frame: Before, immediately after treatment, and at 3 month follow-up
Total sum of AES score; consists of 18 items; range 18-72, higher values indicate higher degree of apathy
Before, immediately after treatment, and at 3 month follow-up
The Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Severity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Measure of global functioning; rated by clinician on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale rated from 1 (normal) through to 7 (most severely ill)
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Global Assessment of Functioning - S
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Measure of global functioning - Symptoms, rated by clinician; measures how much a person's symptoms affect their day-to-day life on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is severely impacted in daily life by symptoms and 100 is not affected at all
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Dichotic Listening Paradigm
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Measure of executive functioning, forced left condition, percentage reported from left ear
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Dichotic Listening Laterality Index
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment
Measure of language lateralization, laterality index in non-forced condition, laterality index is computed according to formula: LI=[(R-L)/(R+L)]*100, where "L" and "R" are the number of correct left and right ear responses, respectively. values can range between -100 (only syllables from left ear correctly reported and +100 (only correct syllables from right ear reported)
Change from Baseline to immediately after treatment and 3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco Hirnstein, PhD, University of Bergen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

May 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UiB-BFS-01/2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared with the ERC Advanced Projects Advanced Grant #249516 "VOICE" and #693124 "ONOFF".

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders

Clinical Trials on DC Stimulator PLUS (NeuroConn)

Subscribe