- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02774889
KOSO (Keep On Stepping On)/ Stepping Online
Once 'Stepping On' Ends: Continuing a Group Falls Prevention Program Via the Internet
The overall purpose of this multi-phase study is to develop (Phase 1) and test potential effectiveness and feasibility of Keep On Stepping On (KOSO)/Stepping Online, an online falls prevention maintenance program for Stepping On (SO) graduates in a group randomized trial (Phase 2).
This application refers to effectiveness component of Phase 2, which entails the randomized clinical trial. Phase 1 has been completed. The feasibility component of Phase 2 will entail process evaluation of the Stepping Online intervention group only.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aim:
This application, for Phase 2 of a larger study, is a 6-month group randomized trial to test the effectiveness of Stepping Online.
Stepping Online (developed in Phase 1) is a continuation website to help Stepping On graduates to:
- Maintain exercises and fall prevention strategies learned in Stepping On, and
- Stay connected with other participants and leaders/peer leaders in the 7-week workshop.
Approach:
Subject Eligibility:
- Stepping On leaders and peer leaders of Milwaukee, Dane, Rock, Adams, Green Lake, Marquette and Waushara Counties during the enrollment window
- Stepping On participants/graduates of the above workshops whose leader assesses that they can safely use Stepping Online to exercise at home
Recruitment and Consenting:
- Leaders/Peer Leaders: County aging unit coordinators will invite leaders to participate in the study and share the names of those who agree with the study research staff. Staff will then explain the study in detail, answer questions, and obtain informed consent from those who agree.
- Participants: (1) Research staff will visit participating leader/peer leader workshops to explain the study; (2) leader will distribute a card for participants to agree to a researcher phone call to learn more. They will then share the contact information of those who agree with study research staff; (3) study research staff members will contact and conduct a recruitment interview by phone. They then schedule those who agree to come to the site where the workshop occurred (or another public place that is private and convenient for research subjects) for consenting and baseline measurement.
Randomization
Randomization will occur on the Stepping On workshop level to ensure that leaders, peer leaders and participants are in the same arm. Procedures:
- County liaisons, who routinely collect data, will provide participants' education level (without personal identifiers);
- Study biostatistician pairs workshops based on above data, as well as geographic location and other data to ensure comparability.
- Participants from each designated pair of SO workshops will provide informed consent and participate in baseline measurements
- Designated pair of SO workshops will be randomized to the Stepping Online (intervention) or to the usual care Control arm.
- Intervention arm: Stepping On graduates (and their leaders/peer leaders) will receive the Stepping Online website for 6 months. They can use their own computer or receive a laptop and Internet access (if needed) for the study duration. Research staff will provide 2 in-home training sessions (2 weeks apart) on how to use Stepping Online's fall prevention features (described under the "Arms and Intervention" section). Participants can call the technical support phone line for more help.
- Control arm: Stepping On graduates in this arm will not receive Stepping Online.
- Neither the intervention nor the control arm subjects will have access to Stepping Online after the 6-month trial.
- Participants in both study arms will complete measurements at their workshop location or another location that is private and convenient fir subjects at baseline (prior to randomization), and later at 3 and 6 months.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
List of Inclusion Criteria:
- Leader/Peer Leader: Leading a SO workshop in Dane, Milwaukee, Rock, Adams, Green Lake, Marquette or Waushara counties during the timeframe prior to the 6-month trial.
- Stepping On Participants/Graduates: Enrolled in one of the above SO workshops.
In Milwaukee and Dane counties, extra effort will be made to enroll African American Stepping On participants/graduates, who are more likely to have lower income and educational level and to be uninsured than their White counterparts.
List of Exclusion Criteria:
Leaders/Peer Leaders:
- Not available to participate in Stepping Online for more than 4 weeks out of the 6 months following enrollment
- Not in the area at the end of the 6-month trial.
Stepping On Participants/Graduates:
- Unable participate in Stepping Online for more than 4 weeks out of the 6 months following enrollment
- Not assessed to be safe by SO leader to do the online exercise program; not in the area for the 3 month and 6 month evaluations
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Stepping Online
Stepping On graduates receive Stepping Online, a password-protected continuation website to maintain fall prevention behaviors.
|
Stepping Online is a password-protected website with Stepping On graduates, whose groups are randomized to Stepping Online and will have access to and training in a password-protected website. The website includes:
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Stepping On Usual Care Control
Subjects control workshops in the condition will not have access to Stepping Online.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of Number of Falls From Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
|
Number of Falls: monthly calendar self-administered sent and returned via mail
|
baseline and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Tandem Walk Errors at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Observed via the Tandem Walk Test at baseline, 3 months, 6 months. Tandem walk errors were the number of errors while walking a four-meter straight line. Place a line on the floor marking the distance. The heel of one foot should be touching the tip of the toes of the other foot. Count the number of errors (stepping off the straight line, not putting heel to toe, needing to grab for support, significant body lean). Participants can use an assistive device if they normally use one. |
up to 6 months
|
|
Gait Speed at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Observed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months; measured in meters per second over four meters.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Total Balance Test
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Standing feet together (side by side) for 10 seconds, followed by standing with side of one heel touching the big toe of the other foot (semi-tandem) for 10 seconds, followed by standing with the heel of one foot in front of the toes of the other (tandem) for 10 seconds. Participants are scored either 0 or 1 for each balance exercise with a total possible range from 0-3 where higher scores indicate improved balance. |
up to 6 months
|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Gait Speed Test
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Participant is timed while walking an 8 foot line on the floor. Scoring is as follows: 0 = could not do
|
6 months
|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Participant is timed while attempting to stand up and sit down 5 times from a chair without using their arms. Scoring is as follows: 0 = unable
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Summary Score
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The total possible range of scores for the SPPB repeated chair test, gait test, and balance test is 0-12 where higher scores indicate the best performance.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Falls Behavioral Risk Scale (FaB)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The Falls Behavioral Scale is a list of 24 statements that describe things participants do in everyday life. Participants are to circle 'never', 'sometimes', 'often', 'always' or 'doesn't apply'. Scoring is from 1 (never) to 4 (always) and is reported as the average score where higher scores indicate higher mitigation of fall risk. |
up to 6 months
|
|
Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (R-UCLA)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
A 3-item scale (adapted, short form of the full 20-item scale) designed to measure one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation.
A 3-point Likert scale is used that ask participants to rate each item as either 3 - "I often feel this way", 2 - "I sometimes feel this way", or 1 - "I hardly ever feel this way".
Scoring: Items 1-3 are summed and participants are given a composite score of 3-9, with higher scores indicating a greater sense of loneliness.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
T-Score for Quality of Life Measured by PROMIS Global Mental Health (GMH) Instrument
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life Short Form is a 10-item instrument that measures both Physical (GPH) and Mental (GMH) Health.
Each scale is reported as a T-score.
The total possible range of scores for GMH is 21.2 - 67.6 where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
T-Score for Quality of Life Measured by PROMIS Global Physical Health (GPH) Instrument
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life Short Form is a 10-item instrument that measures both Physical (GPH) and Mental (GMH) Health.
Each scale is reported as a T-score.
The total possible range of scores for GPH is 16.2 - 67.7 where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Physical Activity Barriers Self-Efficacy Score
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Self-efficacy to reduce barriers to exercise was measured using a 16-item survey where participants rate their confidence that they could perform falls prevention exercises every day for the next 3 months under various circumstances, from 0% 'not at all confident' to 100% 'very confident'.
Scores will be reported from 0-10 with higher scores indicated increased self-efficacy.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Global Rating of Change Score at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Measures self-perceived change in balance, quantifying the extent to which a participant's balance has improved or deteriorated in the over time (past 6 months).
A single question asks the participant to rate their change in balance inside their house, and a single question asks patients to rate their change in balance outside of their house.
A Likert scare of -7 ("a very great deal worse") to +7 ("a very great deal better") is used to rate this perceived change.
|
6 months
|
|
Balance Exercise Adherence at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Adherence was assessed at 3 and 6 months as the number of days balance exercises were performed each week.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Strength Exercise Adherence at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Adherence was assessed at 3 and 6 months as the number of days strength exercises were performed each week.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Social Bonding Score at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Socialization included the 5-item Social Bonding Scale at all timepoints measured as the summed score on a Likert scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), range 0-20.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Encouragement to do Exercises Score at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Socialization included the feeling Encouraged to Exercise at 3 and 6 months on 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy) scale.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Activities Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The ABC instrument measures the confidence of participants from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (completely confident) for activity in a range of conditions.
Scoring is from 0-10 where higher numbers are more confidence.
|
up to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85.
- Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873-80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
- Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.
- Clemson L, Fiatarone Singh MA, Bundy A, Cumming RG, Manollaras K, O'Loughlin P, Black D. Integration of balance and strength training into daily life activity to reduce rate of falls in older people (the LiFE study): randomised parallel trial. BMJ. 2012 Aug 7;345:e4547. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4547.
- Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, McTavish F, Pingree S, Chen WC, Volrathongchai K, Stengle W, Stewart JA, Serlin RC. Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better? J Commun. 2008 Jun;58(2):238-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00383.x.
- Clemson L, Cumming RG, Kendig H, Swann M, Heard R, Taylor K. The effectiveness of a community-based program for reducing the incidence of falls in the elderly: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1487-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52411.x.
- Mahoney, J. E., Gangnon, R., Clemson, L. M., Gobel, V. L., & Lecey, V. (2012, November). Evaluation of stepping on implementation across Wisconsin. In GERONTOLOGIST (Vol. 52, pp. 479-479). JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA: OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-0125
- A534255 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- SMPH/MEDICINE/GER-AD DEV (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Social Isolation
-
University of PadovaActive, not recruitingLoneliness | Social Isolation in Older AdultsItaly
-
University of California, Los AngelesNot yet recruitingSocial Isolation
-
Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of CórdobaCompleted
-
McMaster UniversitySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCompletedSocial IsolationCanada
-
IU University of Applied SciencesUniversity of Bologna; DLR German Aerospace Center; University of Lorraine; European... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationHealthy Adults | Isolation, Social | High AltitudeGermany
-
University of British ColumbiaVancouver Foundation; Inner-City Women's Initiatives SocietyCompletedLoneliness | Social Support | Social IsolationCanada
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation... and other collaboratorsRecruitingQuality of Life | Disability Physical | Social Isolation | Homebound Persons | Social Isolation in Older Adults | Social Isolation or LonelinessUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruiting
-
University Hospital, ToulouseNot yet recruiting
-
Bright Vision HospitalSengkang Community Hospital; Outram Community HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Stepping Online
-
Chonticha KaewjohoUniversity of Phayao; Mae Fah Luang UniversityCompletedRehabilitation | Training | Respiratory Muscle StrengthThailand
-
Medical Research Council, South AfricaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedStepping Stones Program for Preventing HIV Infection in Residents of Rural South African CommunitiesHIV InfectionsSouth Africa
-
New York Institute of TechnologyThe Touro College and University SystemCompletedPhysical Therapy | Rehabilitation ExerciseUnited States
-
National Yang Ming UniversityUnknown
-
Khon Kaen UniversityCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesThailand
-
San Diego State UniversityCompleted
-
Khon Kaen UniversityCompletedSpinal Cord InjuriesThailand
-
Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-PelasciniCompletedAcquired Brain Injury | Critical Illness PolyneuropathyItaly
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Science Council, TaiwanCompletedSleep Apnea Syndrome
-
Pamukkale UniversityCompleted