KOSO (Keep On Stepping On)/ Stepping Online

January 24, 2022 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Once 'Stepping On' Ends: Continuing a Group Falls Prevention Program Via the Internet

The overall purpose of this multi-phase study is to develop (Phase 1) and test potential effectiveness and feasibility of Keep On Stepping On (KOSO)/Stepping Online, an online falls prevention maintenance program for Stepping On (SO) graduates in a group randomized trial (Phase 2).

This application refers to effectiveness component of Phase 2, which entails the randomized clinical trial. Phase 1 has been completed. The feasibility component of Phase 2 will entail process evaluation of the Stepping Online intervention group only.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim:

This application, for Phase 2 of a larger study, is a 6-month group randomized trial to test the effectiveness of Stepping Online.

Stepping Online (developed in Phase 1) is a continuation website to help Stepping On graduates to:

  1. Maintain exercises and fall prevention strategies learned in Stepping On, and
  2. Stay connected with other participants and leaders/peer leaders in the 7-week workshop.

Approach:

  1. Subject Eligibility:

    1. Stepping On leaders and peer leaders of Milwaukee, Dane, Rock, Adams, Green Lake, Marquette and Waushara Counties during the enrollment window
    2. Stepping On participants/graduates of the above workshops whose leader assesses that they can safely use Stepping Online to exercise at home
  2. Recruitment and Consenting:

    1. Leaders/Peer Leaders: County aging unit coordinators will invite leaders to participate in the study and share the names of those who agree with the study research staff. Staff will then explain the study in detail, answer questions, and obtain informed consent from those who agree.
    2. Participants: (1) Research staff will visit participating leader/peer leader workshops to explain the study; (2) leader will distribute a card for participants to agree to a researcher phone call to learn more. They will then share the contact information of those who agree with study research staff; (3) study research staff members will contact and conduct a recruitment interview by phone. They then schedule those who agree to come to the site where the workshop occurred (or another public place that is private and convenient for research subjects) for consenting and baseline measurement.
  3. Randomization

    Randomization will occur on the Stepping On workshop level to ensure that leaders, peer leaders and participants are in the same arm. Procedures:

    1. County liaisons, who routinely collect data, will provide participants' education level (without personal identifiers);
    2. Study biostatistician pairs workshops based on above data, as well as geographic location and other data to ensure comparability.
    3. Participants from each designated pair of SO workshops will provide informed consent and participate in baseline measurements
    4. Designated pair of SO workshops will be randomized to the Stepping Online (intervention) or to the usual care Control arm.
    1. Intervention arm: Stepping On graduates (and their leaders/peer leaders) will receive the Stepping Online website for 6 months. They can use their own computer or receive a laptop and Internet access (if needed) for the study duration. Research staff will provide 2 in-home training sessions (2 weeks apart) on how to use Stepping Online's fall prevention features (described under the "Arms and Intervention" section). Participants can call the technical support phone line for more help.
    2. Control arm: Stepping On graduates in this arm will not receive Stepping Online.
    3. Neither the intervention nor the control arm subjects will have access to Stepping Online after the 6-month trial.
  4. Participants in both study arms will complete measurements at their workshop location or another location that is private and convenient fir subjects at baseline (prior to randomization), and later at 3 and 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

List of Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Leader/Peer Leader: Leading a SO workshop in Dane, Milwaukee, Rock, Adams, Green Lake, Marquette or Waushara counties during the timeframe prior to the 6-month trial.
  2. Stepping On Participants/Graduates: Enrolled in one of the above SO workshops.

In Milwaukee and Dane counties, extra effort will be made to enroll African American Stepping On participants/graduates, who are more likely to have lower income and educational level and to be uninsured than their White counterparts.

List of Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Leaders/Peer Leaders:

    1. Not available to participate in Stepping Online for more than 4 weeks out of the 6 months following enrollment
    2. Not in the area at the end of the 6-month trial.
  2. Stepping On Participants/Graduates:

    1. Unable participate in Stepping Online for more than 4 weeks out of the 6 months following enrollment
    2. Not assessed to be safe by SO leader to do the online exercise program; not in the area for the 3 month and 6 month evaluations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Stepping Online

Stepping On graduates receive Stepping Online, a password-protected continuation website to maintain fall prevention behaviors.

  1. Fall prevention tips
  2. Fall prevention exercise videos noting technique and safety
  3. Guest expert videos and communication with expert
  4. Tools to set exercise goals, reminders and track progress
  5. Fall prevention specialist for feedback and group activities
  6. Discussion and messaging (1:1, small and large group)
  7. Fall prevention resources.

Stepping Online is a password-protected website with Stepping On graduates, whose groups are randomized to Stepping Online and will have access to and training in a password-protected website. The website includes:

  1. Fall prevention tips
  2. Fall prevention exercise videos with narrations for proper technique and safety precautions
  3. Guest expert videos with online access to the guest expert to ask questions
  4. Tools to set exercise goals, get reminders and track progress
  5. Access to a fall prevention specialist for personal feedback and suggested group homework
  6. Group discussion and messaging (one-to-one and with their fellow Stepping On workshop participants group, or with all Stepping Online participants and leaders)
  7. Fall prevention resources
Other Names:
  • Keep On Stepping On (KOSO)
No Intervention: Stepping On Usual Care Control
Subjects control workshops in the condition will not have access to Stepping Online.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Number of Falls From Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
Number of Falls: monthly calendar self-administered sent and returned via mail
baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Tandem Walk Errors at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months

Observed via the Tandem Walk Test at baseline, 3 months, 6 months. Tandem walk errors were the number of errors while walking a four-meter straight line.

Place a line on the floor marking the distance. The heel of one foot should be touching the tip of the toes of the other foot. Count the number of errors (stepping off the straight line, not putting heel to toe, needing to grab for support, significant body lean). Participants can use an assistive device if they normally use one.

up to 6 months
Gait Speed at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Observed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months; measured in meters per second over four meters.
up to 6 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Total Balance Test
Time Frame: up to 6 months

Standing feet together (side by side) for 10 seconds, followed by standing with side of one heel touching the big toe of the other foot (semi-tandem) for 10 seconds, followed by standing with the heel of one foot in front of the toes of the other (tandem) for 10 seconds.

Participants are scored either 0 or 1 for each balance exercise with a total possible range from 0-3 where higher scores indicate improved balance.

up to 6 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Gait Speed Test
Time Frame: 6 months

Participant is timed while walking an 8 foot line on the floor.

Scoring is as follows:

0 = could not do

  1. = >5.7 sec (<0.43 m/sec)
  2. = 4.1-6.5 sec (0.44-0.60 m/sec)
  3. = 3.2-4.0 (0.61-0.77 m/sec)
  4. = <3.1 sec (>0.78 m/sec)
6 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: up to 6 months

Participant is timed while attempting to stand up and sit down 5 times from a chair without using their arms.

Scoring is as follows:

0 = unable

  1. = > 16.7 sec
  2. = 16.6-13.7 sec
  3. = 13.6-11.2 sec
  4. = < 11.1 sec
up to 6 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): Summary Score
Time Frame: up to 6 months
The total possible range of scores for the SPPB repeated chair test, gait test, and balance test is 0-12 where higher scores indicate the best performance.
up to 6 months
Falls Behavioral Risk Scale (FaB)
Time Frame: up to 6 months

The Falls Behavioral Scale is a list of 24 statements that describe things participants do in everyday life.

Participants are to circle 'never', 'sometimes', 'often', 'always' or 'doesn't apply'. Scoring is from 1 (never) to 4 (always) and is reported as the average score where higher scores indicate higher mitigation of fall risk.

up to 6 months
Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (R-UCLA)
Time Frame: up to 6 months
A 3-item scale (adapted, short form of the full 20-item scale) designed to measure one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. A 3-point Likert scale is used that ask participants to rate each item as either 3 - "I often feel this way", 2 - "I sometimes feel this way", or 1 - "I hardly ever feel this way". Scoring: Items 1-3 are summed and participants are given a composite score of 3-9, with higher scores indicating a greater sense of loneliness.
up to 6 months
T-Score for Quality of Life Measured by PROMIS Global Mental Health (GMH) Instrument
Time Frame: up to 6 months
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life Short Form is a 10-item instrument that measures both Physical (GPH) and Mental (GMH) Health. Each scale is reported as a T-score. The total possible range of scores for GMH is 21.2 - 67.6 where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
up to 6 months
T-Score for Quality of Life Measured by PROMIS Global Physical Health (GPH) Instrument
Time Frame: up to 6 months
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Quality of Life Short Form is a 10-item instrument that measures both Physical (GPH) and Mental (GMH) Health. Each scale is reported as a T-score. The total possible range of scores for GPH is 16.2 - 67.7 where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
up to 6 months
Physical Activity Barriers Self-Efficacy Score
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Self-efficacy to reduce barriers to exercise was measured using a 16-item survey where participants rate their confidence that they could perform falls prevention exercises every day for the next 3 months under various circumstances, from 0% 'not at all confident' to 100% 'very confident'. Scores will be reported from 0-10 with higher scores indicated increased self-efficacy.
up to 6 months
Global Rating of Change Score at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months
Measures self-perceived change in balance, quantifying the extent to which a participant's balance has improved or deteriorated in the over time (past 6 months). A single question asks the participant to rate their change in balance inside their house, and a single question asks patients to rate their change in balance outside of their house. A Likert scare of -7 ("a very great deal worse") to +7 ("a very great deal better") is used to rate this perceived change.
6 months
Balance Exercise Adherence at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Adherence was assessed at 3 and 6 months as the number of days balance exercises were performed each week.
up to 6 months
Strength Exercise Adherence at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Adherence was assessed at 3 and 6 months as the number of days strength exercises were performed each week.
up to 6 months
Social Bonding Score at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Socialization included the 5-item Social Bonding Scale at all timepoints measured as the summed score on a Likert scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), range 0-20.
up to 6 months
Encouragement to do Exercises Score at 3 Months and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
Socialization included the feeling Encouraged to Exercise at 3 and 6 months on 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy) scale.
up to 6 months
Activities Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: up to 6 months
The ABC instrument measures the confidence of participants from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (completely confident) for activity in a range of conditions. Scoring is from 0-10 where higher numbers are more confidence.
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014-0125
  • A534255 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • SMPH/MEDICINE/GER-AD DEV (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Social Isolation

Clinical Trials on Stepping Online

Subscribe