A Randomized Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-eluting Metallic Stent in Long Coronary Lesions

May 17, 2018 updated by: Yonsei University
PCI of diffuse long coronary lesions still remains challenging because of relatively high risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis compared to short coronary lesions. The purpose of the study is to compare an incidence of composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 1 year between Absorb everolimus-eluting BVS and Xience EES after coronary intervention in long lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

950

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Recruiting
        • Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 19-85 years
  • Patients with ischemic heart disease requiring PCI
  • Significant coronary de novo lesion (stenosis >50% by quantitative angiographic analysis) requiring stent ≥28 mm in length based on angiographic estimation
  • Reference vessel diameter of 2.5 to 3.75 mm by operator assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute myocardial infarction within 48 hours with unstable hemodynamics requiring pharmacologic or mechanical support
  • Complex coronary morphology including left main disease and bifurcation lesion requiring two-stent technique
  • Contraindication or hypersensitivity to anti-platelet agents or contrast media
  • Treated with any metallic stent or BVS within 3 months at other vessel
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%
  • Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing
  • Inability to follow the patient over the period of 1 year after enrollment, as assessed by the investigator
  • Inability to understand or read the informed content

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: absorb arm
PCI with Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold
Device: PCI with Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold
Patients allocated to this arm will undergone PCI with Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. It will be allowed to used multiple stents for a long coronary lesion.
Experimental: Xience arm
PCI with Xience everolimus-eluting metallic stent
Device: PCI with Xience everolimus-eluting metallic stent
Patients allocated to this arm will undergone PCI with Xience everolimus-eluting metallic stent. It will be allowed to used multiple stents for a long coronary lesion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of composite of major adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 1 year after PCI
Cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and target-lesion revascularization (TLR)
1 year after PCI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Yonsei University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1-2016-0025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe