Increasing Risk Perception of Physical Activity Using Patient-targeted Feedback. (RiskAct)

August 8, 2022 updated by: Dr. Sebastian Kohlmann, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Increasing Risk Perception of Physical Activity Using Patient-targeted Feedback: Randomized Controlled Trial.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of a minimal intervention on risk perception of physical inactivity in patients with known coronary heart disease (CHD) and patients at risk for CHD. Therefore half of the patients (intervention group) get a personal feedback on their individual level of physical activity measured by pedometers and self-report questionnaires plus information about the risk factor 'physical inactivity' for heart diseases. Following the hypotheses the feedback should increase the patients risk perception of physical inactivity and furthermore increase physical activity.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

121

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 22041
        • Cardiologicum Hamburg
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • University Heart Center, Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Known coronary heart disease or at least 2 risk factors for coronary heart disease
  • Age: 18 years up to 75 years
  • Sufficient language skills
  • Access to a telephone
  • Willingness to participate in telephone interviews
  • "Informed consent"

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life threatening health status
  • Severe somatic or/and psychological disorder that needs urgent treatment
  • Hospital stay within the last 7 days
  • Surgical intervention plus hospital stay for at least 3 days within the last 2 months
  • Myocardial infarction within the last 3 month
  • Musculoskeletal diseases, which have a strong influence on physical activity
  • Severe cognitive or/and visual difficulties

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Pedometer+physical-activity-feedback
At cardiac consultation patients receive a patient-targeted individual physical-activity-feedback.
At cardiac consultation receive an individual feedback on their personal physical activity level.
Patients receive a pedometer two weeks prior to cardiac consultation.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Pedometer-only
Patients use a Pedometer in order to measure their daily step number
Patients receive a pedometer two weeks prior to cardiac consultation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk perception of physical activity level
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up
time of measurement: one month after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk perception of physical activity level
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at three months follow-up
time of measurement: three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at three months follow-up
Physical activity Level (Pedometer, time spent sitting, IPAQ)
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
Adherence to the pedometer
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
Satisfaction and acceptance of the feedback
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
Depression severity (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
Anxiety severity (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
Somatic symptom severity (PHQ-15)
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
Quality of life (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
New York Heart Association Class
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
Canadian Cardiology Society Class
Time Frame: Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up
time of measurement: one months and three months after cardiac consultation
Outcome measure is assessed at one month follow-up and three months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bernd Löwe, Prof. Dr., Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Disease

Clinical Trials on Patient-targeted individual physical-activity-feedback

Subscribe