A Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Study of Dapirolizumab Pegol (DZP) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

June 7, 2021 updated by: UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-ranging Study Followed by an Observational Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The purpose is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different doses of Dapirolizumab Pegol (DZP) versus placebo in adult subjects with moderately to severely active systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

182

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • Sl0023 101
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • Sl0023 102
      • Providencia, Chile
        • Sl0023 202
      • Providencia, Chile
        • Sl0023 203
      • Puerto Varas, Chile
        • Sl0023 201
      • Vina del Mar, Chile
        • Sl0023 204
      • Barranquilla, Colombia
        • Sl0023 213
      • Bogotá, Colombia
        • Sl0023 212
      • Bogotá, Colombia
        • Sl0023 214
      • Bucaramanga, Colombia
        • Sl0023 216
      • Chía, Colombia
        • Sl0023 211
      • Medellín, Colombia
        • Sl0023 215
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Sl0023 341
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • Sl0023 113
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • Sl0023 124
      • Guadalajara, Mexico
        • Sl0023 225
      • León, Mexico
        • Sl0023 224
      • Mexico, Mexico
        • Sl0023 221
      • San Luis Potosí, Mexico
        • Sl0023 222
      • Arequipa, Peru
        • Sl0023 232
      • Lima, Peru
        • Sl0023 231
      • Lima, Peru
        • Sl0023 234
      • Lima, Peru
        • Sl0023 235
      • Bytom, Poland
        • Sl0023 133
      • Lublin, Poland
        • Sl0023 136
      • Poznan, Poland
        • Sl0023 131
      • Sosnowiec, Poland
        • Sl0023 134
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Sl0023 135
      • Łódź, Poland
        • Sl0023 138
      • Brasov, Romania
        • Sl0023 146
      • Bucuresti, Romania
        • Sl0023 142
      • Cluj-Napoca, Romania
        • Sl0023 144
      • Galati, Romania
        • Sl0023 141
      • Kazan, Russian Federation
        • Sl0023 157
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation
        • Sl0023 156
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Sl0023 152
      • Voronezh, Russian Federation
        • Sl0023 155
      • Yaroslavl', Russian Federation
        • Sl0023 151
      • Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
        • Sl0023 153
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Sl0023 161
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Sl0023 162
      • Tenerife, Spain
        • Sl0023 166
      • Kyiv, Ukraine
        • Sl0023 172
      • Kyiv, Ukraine
        • Sl0023 175
      • Odessa, Ukraine
        • Sl0023 171
      • Vinnytsya, Ukraine
        • Sl0023 173
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Sl0023 312
    • California
      • El Cajon, California, United States, 92020
        • Sl0023 307
      • El Cajon, California, United States, 92020
        • Sl0023 309
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92646
        • Sl0023 323
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Sl0023 311
      • Thousand Oaks, California, United States, 91360
        • Sl0023 314
      • Upland, California, United States, 91786
        • Sl0023 302
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Sl0023 326
    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33765
        • Sl0023 304
      • DeBary, Florida, United States, 32713
        • Sl0023 322
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Sl0023 321
      • Miami Lakes, Florida, United States, 33014
        • Sl0023 301
      • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States, 34684
        • Sl0023 319
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33603
        • Sl0023 310
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30303
        • Sl0023 324
      • Stockbridge, Georgia, United States, 30281
        • Sl0023 327
    • Idaho
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404
        • Sl0023 320
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87104
        • Sl0023 306
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
        • Sl0023 313
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73101
        • Sl0023 305
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
        • Sl0023 315
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Sl0023 308
    • Texas
      • Amarillo, Texas, United States, 79124
        • Sl0023 317
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77034
        • Sl0023 303
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
        • Sl0023 328

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) confirmed by Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria
  • Moderate to severe SLE disease activity
  • Evidence for at least 1 of the following SLE markers:

    • Anti-dsDNA antibodies confirmed by central laboratory or
    • Low complement confirmed by central laboratory or
    • Antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer of >= 1:80 in combination with at least 1 of the following: Historical positivity for anti-dsDNA or Positivity for extractable nuclear antigen (anti-ENA) confirmed by central laboratory
  • The subject is receiving stable SLE standard-of-care medication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mixed connective tissue disease, scleroderma, and/or overlap syndromes of SLE
  • Subjects with severe neuropsychiatric SLE or other neurological symptoms that in the opinion of the Investigator, would prevent the subject from completing protocol required procedures and assessments.
  • New or worsening Class III or IV lupus nephritis
  • Chronic kidney failure stage 3b
  • Evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, agammaglobulinemias, T-cell deficiencies, or human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 infection at any time prior to or during the study
  • Clinically significant active or latent infection (eg. chronic viral hepatitis B or C)
  • Known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, or latent TB (LTB) infection
  • Live/live attenuated vaccines within 6 weeks prior to the first study drug infusion (Visit 2) or who plan to receive these vaccines during the study or 12 weeks after the final dose of study drug
  • History of thromboembolic events within 12 months of screening
  • Subject has used protocol defined prohibited medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
Solution for infusion, 0,9% saline
Experimental: DZP dose 1
Dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) dose 1 in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
Solution for infusion
Experimental: DZP dose 2
Dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) dose 2 in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
Solution for infusion
Experimental: DZP dose 3
Dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) dose 3 in a specified sequence for a total of 24 weeks
Solution for infusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Disease Activity Index 2004 (BILAG 2004)-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) (mNRI) Response Across 3 Doses of Dapirolizumab Pegol (DZP) and Placebo (PBO) at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24

The primary efficacy variable was assessed by establishing if there was a dose response relationship between BICLA response at Week 24 and dose, using Multiple Comparison Procedure - Modelling (MCP-Mod). Four candidate dose-response models were evaluated: a linear model, a logistic model, and 2 Emax models, and the MCP-Mod methodology controlled for multiplicity.

BICLA response was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

  1. BILAG 2004 improvement: A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤ 1 new B.
  2. No worsening in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score.
  3. No worsening in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), defined as < 10 millimeter (mm) increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).
  4. No disallowed changes in concomitant medications, mainly including increases in corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and antimalarials.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Percentage of Participants With BICLA (mNRI) Response in the Individual Dose Groups at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24

BICLA response was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:

  1. BILAG 2004 improvement: A scores at Baseline improved to B, C or D; B scores improved to C or D; no new A scores and ≤ 1 new B.
  2. No worsening in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), defined as no increase in SLEDAI-2K total score.
  3. No worsening in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), defined as < 10 millimeter (mm) increase on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).
  4. No disallowed changes in concomitant medications, mainly including increases in corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and antimalarials.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event (AE) was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. All AEs that occurred during the study were considered related unless clearly unrelated.
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants With a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)

A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) must have met 1 or more of the following criteria:

  • Death
  • Life threatening
  • Significant or persistent disability/incapacity
  • Congenital anomaly/birth defect (including that occurring in a fetus)
  • Important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the study participant, and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the other outcomes listed in the definition of serious
  • Initial inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization.
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs) of Interest
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)

Adverse events of interest (AEOI) were identified by the Investigator based on definitions per protocol, documented on the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF), adequately monitored, and source controlled.

AEOI (regardless of seriousness):

  • Moderate to severe infections, including opportunistic infections and tuberculosis (TB)
  • Infusion reactions (including hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis)
  • Thromboembolic events (including but not limited to cardiovascular events, stroke, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis)
  • Prespecified neurological events: severe and/or serious headache, positional headache, cranial nerve dysfunction, or signs and symptoms of meningitis (photophobia, neck stiffness)
  • Malignancies.
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants Who Permanently Withdrew of Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event (AE) was therefore any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. All AEs that occurred during the study were considered related unless clearly unrelated.
From Baseline (Week 1) until end of the study (Week 48)
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Blood pressure was measured in millimetre of mercury (mmHg).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Blood pressure was measured in millimetre of mercury (mmHg).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Pulse Rate was measured in beats per minute (beats/min).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Temperature
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Temperature was measured in Grad Celsius (°C).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, and Week 20
Weight was measured in kilograms (kg).
Baseline (Week 1), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, and Week 20
Mean Change From Baseline in Height
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Height was measured in centimeters (cm).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Number of Participants With 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormal Findings
Time Frame: Screening, Week 4, Week 24, Week 28 and Week 48
Twelve-lead ECG assessments should have been performed prior to dosing (if applicable) and prior to obtaining pharmacokinetic (PK) or other laboratory samples. Electrocardiograms were recorded digitally and read by the Investigator for recording in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF).
Screening, Week 4, Week 24, Week 28 and Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Hemoglobin was measured in grams per liter (g/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Hematocrit
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Hematocrit was measured in volume percentage (%) of red blood cells in blood.
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Erythrocytes was measured in number of erythrocytes per liter (10^12/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume was measured in femtolitres (fL).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (HGB) Concentration was measured in grams per liter (g/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin was measured in picograms (pg).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Leukocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Leukocytes was measured in number of leukocytes per liter (10^9/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Basophils
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Basophils was measured in number of basophils per liter (10^9/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Basophils/Leukocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Basophils/Leukocytes was measured in percentages (%).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Eosinophils
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Eosinophils was measured in number of eosinophils per liter (10^9/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Eosinophils/Leukocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Eosinophils/Leukocytes was measured in percentages (%).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Lymphocytes was measured in number of lymphocytes per liter (10^9/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes/Leukocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes was measured in percentages (%).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Monocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Monocytes was measured in number of monocytes per liter (10^9/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Monocytes/Leukocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Monocytes/Leukocytes was measured in percentages (%).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Neutrophils
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Neutrophils was measured in number of neutrophils per liter (10^9/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Neutrophils/Leukocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Neutrophils/Leukocytes was measured in percentages (%).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Platelets
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Platelets was measured in number of platelets per liter (10^9/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 3 (CD3)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) was measured in cells per microliter (cells/µL).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in CD3/Lymphocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
CD3/Lymphocytes was measured in percentages (%).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 19 (CD19)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19) was measured in cells per microliter (cells/µL).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in CD19/Lymphocytes
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
CD19/Lymphocytes was measured in percentages (%).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Aspartate Aminotransferase was measured in units per liter (U/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Alanine Aminotransferase was measured in units per liter (U/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Alkaline Phosphatase was measured in units per liter (U/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Gamma Glutamyl Transferase
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase was measured in units per liter (U/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Bilirubin was measured in micromols per liter (µmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Direct Bilirubin
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Direct Bilirubin was measured in micromols per liter (µmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Lactate Dehydrogenase was measured in units per liter (U/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Creatinine
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Creatinine was measured in micromols per liter (µmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Urea Nitrogen
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Urea Nitrogen was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Sodium
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Sodium was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Potassium
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Potassium was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Calcium
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Calcium was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Phosphate
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Phosphate was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Cholesterol
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Cholesterol was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Triglycerides was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Protein
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Protein was measured in grams per liter (g/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Albumin
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Albumin was measured in grams per liter (g/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Glucose
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Glucose was measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Lipase, Pancreatic
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Lipase, Pancreatic was measured in units per liter (U/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Creatine Kinase was measured in units per liter (U/L).
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in pH
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes (/HPF)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Leukocytes (/HPF)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48
From Baseline (Week 1) to Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SL0023
  • 2015-004457-40 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe