Efficacy Study of the LARA Wheelchair System for Subacute Stroke Patients

Lever Actuated Rehabilitation of the Arm Using Wheelchair Propulsion and Computer Gaming

This study will test the effectiveness of a new lever drive wheelchair, LARA - Lever Actuated Resonance Assistance. LARA facilitates patients in performing a high amount of practice using their moderate to severely impaired upper extremity after stroke.

Investigators will recruit 44 subjects with subacute strokes to participate in the study through the acute rehabilitation unit of the UC Irvine Douglas Hospital. Study participants will be randomized into 2 groups: LARA therapy group or standard therapy group. The LARA therapy group will use LARA to propel themselves to therapy appointments in the unit and to play video games with the affected upper extremity for 30 mins / day. The standard therapy group will use a standard wheelchair to propel themselves using their unaffected upper and lower extremities. They will be asked to perform a matched duration of standard arm exercises for 30 mins/ day. This program of standard arm exercises was developed by an OT at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago which consists of graded-difficulty table-supported exercises.

This study will have 3 assessment visits: baseline, 3 weeks after therapy or upon discharge from the acute rehabilitation unit if sooner, and a 3-month follow up.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cerebrovascular Accident
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: LARA; Behavioral: Standard

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 23
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
      • University of California, Irvine

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment
2. Stroke onset 1-4 weeks prior to study enrollment
3. Arm motor FM score of < 30 (out of 66) at Baseline Visit
4. Absence of moderate to severe shoulder pain ( Score <3 on the 10 point visual analog pain scale)
5. Any deficit in vision, alertness, language, attention, or other cognitive functions that interfere with playing the LARA games

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Age >80 years at the time of enrollment
2. Severe tone in the affected upper extremities (Score ≥ 4 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale)
3. Severe language problem that would prevent participants from properly understanding instructions
4. Severe reduced level of consciousness
5. Severe aphasia (score of 3 on the NIH stroke scale (question 9))
6. Severe loss of sensation in stroke-affected upper extremities (Score < 1 on the Nottingham sensory assessment)
7. Currently pregnant
8. Difficulty in understanding or complying with the instructions given by the experimenter
9. Inability to perform the experimental task that will be studied

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The LARA Therapy; The LARA arm of this study will use the LARA system while study participants are staying at the acute rehabilitation unit of UC Irvine Douglas Hospital. LARA is a system that facilitates patients to perform high amounts of arm movement with the affected upper extremity. Study participants are able to actively propel themselves in the unit.	Device: LARA; Study participants will use LARA to propel themselves and to play computer games with the impaired upper extremity for 30 min/day in addition to standard of care rehabilitation therapy for 3 weeks or the duration of their stay.
Active Comparator: The Standard Therapy; The control arm of this study will use a standard wheelchair while study participants are staying at the acute rehabilitation unit of UC Irvine Douglas Hospital. Study participants will have no exposure to LARA and they will use a standard wheelchair. They will use their unaffected upper and lower extremities to propel themselves in the unit.	Behavioral: Standard; Study participants will receive no exposure to LARA, will use a standard wheelchair, and will be asked to perform a program of conventional arm exercises for 30 min/day, also in addition to standard of care rehabilitation therapy for 3 weeks or the duration of their stay.; Other Names: Conventional Arm and Hand Exercise Program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer (FM) Motor Assessment of the Upper Extremity	We measure the change of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment scores from the baseline evaluation to the 3-month follow up evaluation after the end of intervention. Fugl-Meyer is a 66-point scale measuring the movement pattern of the upper extremities. For the study, we analyze the total score only. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-month evaluation after the end of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale	We measure the spasticity of the upper extremity at baseline, post-intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Spasticity is described as the resistance to passive movement. Participants are asked to relax and evaluators assess muscle resistance to passive movement at one joint at a time: Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, and Fingers. The evaluator will then grade the resistance on a 6-point scale for each joint. Higher scores indicate more rigid movement or more muscle tone resistance. The minimum score is zero and the maximum score is 4. For this study, we combine all subscores from each joint to compute a total spasticity score.	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-months after the end of intervention
Timed 10-meter Walk	We measure the time one takes to complete a 10-meter walk at baseline evaluation, the post-intervention evaluation, and the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to walk at a distance of 10-meter over a level surface with 2 meters for acceleration and 2 meters for deceleration. Participants are instructed to walk at their comfortable or normal speed over the entire distance. Participants are timed once the first foot passes the acceleration path; the time is stopped once the first foot enters the deceleration path. The lower scores indicate a better outcome.	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-months after the end of intervention
Box and Blocks Test	We measured the Box and Blocks Test scores at baseline evaluation, the post-intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.	Baseline, Post-intervention evaluation at 3 weeks, and 3-months after the end of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of California, Irvine
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Steven Cramer, MD, University of California, Irvine

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Smith BW, Lobo-Prat J, Zondervan DK, Lew C, Chan V, Chou C, Toledo S, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Shaw S, Cramer SC. Using a bimanual lever-driven wheelchair for arm movement practice early after stroke: A pilot, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021 Nov;35(11):1577-1589. doi: 10.1177/02692155211014362. Epub 2021 May 24.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 15, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 10, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): January 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 5, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 8, 2016
• First Posted (Estimate): July 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 21, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 7, 2020
• Last Verified: July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Stroke
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2016-3304

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No