The INCREASE Study - Delaying the Onset of Alzheimer's Symptomatic Expression (INCREASE)

June 27, 2023 updated by: Daniela Moga

INtervention for Cognitive Reserve Enhancement in Delaying the Onset of Alzheimer's Symptomatic Expression: The INCREASE Study

The study will examine the impact on cognitive reserve of a pharmacist-physician patient-centered medication therapy management intervention to address inappropriate medication use as identified by the Beers 2015 list. By bolstering cognitive reserve, this project will directly address the National Alzheimer's Project Act 2015 priorities serving to delay onset of symptoms in preclinical dementia. The results of this study will provide valuable insights on how to expand this intervention to reduce the prevalence and associated healthcare costs of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a 12-month, parallel arm, study to be conducted at the University of Kentucky. The study will involve assessing medication use and identifying any medicines that may be inappropriate for elderly adults.

At the beginning of the study, participants will be asked to undergo one amyloid-PET scan to detect early amyloid plaques in their brain which could increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease in the near future. In addition, at the beginning and end of the study, participants will be asked to use a scopolamine patch. This patch is not being used to prevent motion sickness (as approved by the FDA), but instead is being used to challenge the participant's memory and thinking abilities.

Part of the study includes collecting information regarding participants memory and thinking abilities. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires as well as memory and thinking tests.

A study doctor will review participants medical history and then perform routine medical (physical and neurological) examinations.

Two of the study visits will be conducted by phone to check up on the participants.

At the beginning, middle, and end of the study, participants will meet with a doctor and pharmacist to review and make any changes deemed appropriate to their current medicines. This will be done in order to try and eliminate medicines that are not recommended for the elderly. These visits are referred to as the Medication Therapy Management (MTM).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 101 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-demented
  • No previous reaction or contraindication to scopolamine patch, or medical condition warranting dose adjustment in scopolamine including but not limited to: open angle glaucoma, gastrointestinal or urinary outlet obstructions, seizures, or psychosis.
  • No contraindications to Aβ-PET scan including hypersensitivity to PET ligand or radiation exposures in the past year that would exceed the acceptable safe annual exposure in combination with the Aβ PET
  • Medically stable and able to complete all study activities, as determined by the investigator
  • Reporting at least one potentially inappropriate medication as listed in the Beers 2015 criteria
  • Living in the community
  • Willing to participate in this intervention study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or other know intolerance to scopolamine patches
  • Narrow-angle glaucoma
  • Difficulty swallowing
  • Stomach or bowel problems (e.g., blockage, muscle weakness, ulcerative colitis)
  • Bleeding
  • Acid reflux disease
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Blockage of the urinary tract.
  • Seizures
  • Psychosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Participants enrolled into this arm will only receive educational materials, but will not receive specific recommendations to make changes to the medications they are taking.

Cognitive testing at the beginning and the end of the study will be done with and without a scopolamine patch to reveal cognitive reserve.

Participants will receive educational materials, but will not receive MTM.
Other Names:
  • Control
At the beginning and end of the study, participants will be asked to use a scopolamine patch. This patch is not being used to prevent motion sickness (as approved by the FDA), but instead is being used to challenge the participant's memory and thinking abilities and determine cognitive reserve.
Other Names:
  • Scopolamine Challenge
Active Comparator: Medication Therapy Management (MTM)

Participants enrolled into this arm will receive educational materials and will have their medications assessed; recommendations for changes in the medications taken will be made when appropriate.

Cognitive testing at the beginning and the end of the study will be done with and without a scopolamine patch to reveal cognitive reserve.

At the beginning and end of the study, participants will be asked to use a scopolamine patch. This patch is not being used to prevent motion sickness (as approved by the FDA), but instead is being used to challenge the participant's memory and thinking abilities and determine cognitive reserve.
Other Names:
  • Scopolamine Challenge
Participants will receive MTM in addition to the educational materials.
Other Names:
  • Intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication Appropriateness Index
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year
Change from baseline to end of study. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) rates medications as "appropriate", "marginally appropriate", or "inappropriate" based on ten criteria. All medications reported by study participants were evaluated by the study team and assigned a medication-specific MAI. As an outcome measure, the total MAI was obtained by adding the medication specific MAIs for all medications reported by the participant. Minimum score for one medication is 0 (appropriate) and the maximum is 18 (inappropriate for all criteria). Total MAI depends on the number of medications taken by participant. A decrease in MAI from baseline to end of study indicates improvement in medication appropriateness.
change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year
Trail Making Test B With the Scopolamine Patch
Time Frame: baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year
End of study for Trail Making Test B with the scopolamine patch. The mean and standard used to compute the TMTB z-scores were taken from a sample of cognitively intact older adult research volunteers (Weintraub et al. 2009; mean = 90.3, SD = 50) (22). Z-scores were then multiplied by -1 to facilitate interpretation, since higher TMTB scores are worse. For the z-score, we converted time in seconds to units of standard deviations from a mean of 0, where 0 represents the mean performance of cognitively intact (normal) older adult research volunteers enrolled in longitudinal studies at Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers in the United States. Scores that are at least 1.5 standard deviations below the mean are indicative of potential cognitive impairment.
baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Reserve: Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year
Change from baseline to end of study for Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Z score is based on the NACC cognitively normal population (https://files.alz.washington.edu/documentation/weintraub-2018-v3.pdf), Z score = 0 corresponds mean MoCA score for cognitively normal older adults; higher Z scores are better; typical neuropsych interpretation of z scores is that -1.5 indicates impaired performance on that test.
change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year
Cognitive Reserve: California Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year

Change from baseline to end of study for California Verbal Learning test. Z scores (higher scores are better; Z score = 0 corresponds mean CVLT score for cognitively normal older adults; typical neuropsych interpretation of z scores is that -1.5 indicates impaired performance on that test) are adjusted for age and sex and are based on the normative population used to develop norms for CVLT-II; "individuals sampled to create the normative data were tested cross-sectionally, demographically matched to the most recent U.S. Censuses, and screened for self-reported neurological, psychiatric, or debilitating medical illnesses." Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987-2000). California Verbal Learning Test--Second Edition (CVLT -II) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.

https://doi.org/10.1037/t15072-000

change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year
Perceived Health Status
Time Frame: change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year
Change from baseline to end of study for Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). T scores have a mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher scores are better; mean = 50 represents expected mean in general US adult population, with no available clinically relevant thresholds .
change from baseline to end of study, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniela Moga, MD, PhD, University of Kentucky

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

July 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe