Circumcision Versus Preputioplasty for BXO in Children (BXO)

November 8, 2018 updated by: Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Circumcision Versus Preputioplasty for BXO in Children: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

Traditionally, BXO is managed with circumcision (surgical removal of the foreskin) and this approach has long been held as the 'gold standard. Whilst this may be curative in many cases, it has been shown that 20% of boys require a further operative procedure on their penis to widen the urethral opening (to treat meatal stenosis)

An alternative to circumcision was proposed: a preputioplasty (surgery to widen the opening of the foreskin) was combined with injection of steroids into the affected foreskin. Subsequently, the same group compared the outcomes of this technique with circumcision, and reported circumcision was successfully avoided in 92% of the preputioplasty group. In addition, the rate of meatal stenosis (narrowing of the urethral opening requiring surgery) was significantly lower (6% vs 19%, P = .034 ). Preputioplasty may therefore: (i) offer protection against meatal stenosis and reduce the requirement for further surgery; and (ii) offer the benefit of retaining the foreskin, the function of which, while debated, likely includes sexual function. In view of these potential benefits, authors have called for a randomised trial to compare circumcision to preputioplasty and injection of steroids.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The interventions to be compared are operations to treat BXO called:

(i) circumcision: this will be a standard surgical circumcision whereby the prepuce (foreskin of the penis) is excised and the cut edge of the outer prepuce sutured to the cut edge of the inner prepuce. The two study team members performing the surgery in this trial (HC and SK) will be free to choose the method of circumcision (e.g. guillotine vs. sleeve) as this is not thought to influence outcome. The foreskin will be sent for histological analysis.

(ii) preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone. Briefly, longitudinal incisions will be placed in the area of phimosis, and these will be sutured transversely to allow the prepuce to become retractile. A biopsy of an area of affected foreskin will be sent for histological analysis. The intention will be to perform three incisions (tri-radiate) but the final decision on how many will be made by the operating surgeon and based on the appearance of the prepuce and result of initial incision(s). Once the prepuce is felt to be freely retractile, 1 - 3 mL of triamcinolone (Adcortyl Bristol-Myers Squibb 10 mg/mL) will be injected intradermally around the circumference of the affected foreskin using a 25-gauge needle.

These procedures are established treatments for BXO and currently in use by the trial surgeons in the same setting as the trial.The preputioplasty with injection of triamcinolone procedure has previously been approved by the Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Trust Clinical Development Evaluation Group (CDEG).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merseyside
      • Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom, L12 2AP
        • Alder Hey Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged between 2 and 16 years
  • diagnosed with BXO
  • require surgery to treat BXO

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous penile surgery
  • circumcision or preputioplasty medically contraindicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: circumcision
(i) circumcision: this will be a standard surgical circumcision whereby the prepuce (foreskin of the penis) is excised and the cut edge of the outer prepuce sutured to the cut edge of the inner prepuce.
(i) circumcision: this will be a standard surgical circumcision whereby the prepuce (foreskin of the penis) is excised and the cut edge of the outer prepuce sutured to the cut edge of the inner prepuce. The two study team members performing the surgery in this trial (HC and SK) will be free to choose the method of circumcision (e.g. guillotine vs. sleeve) as this is not thought to influence outcome. The foreskin will be sent for histological analysis.
Other: preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone
(ii) preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone: longitudinal incisions will be placed in the area of phimosis, and these will be sutured transversely to allow the prepuce to become retractile.
(ii) preputioplasty with intralesional injection of triamcinolone: this will be performed as described by Wilkinson et al.[5] Briefly, longitudinal incisions will be placed in the area of phimosis, and these will be sutured transversely to allow the prepuce to become retractile. A biopsy of an area of affected foreskin will be sent for histological analysis. The intention will be to perform three incisions (tri-radiate) but the final decision on how many will be made by the operating surgeon and based on the appearance of the prepuce and result of initial incision(s). Once the prepuce is felt to be freely retractile, 1 - 3 mL of triamcinolone (Adcortyl Bristol-Myers Squibb 10 mg/mL) will be injected intradermally around the circumference of the affected foreskin using a 25-gauge needle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Recruitment Rate including reasons for non-recruitment.
12 months
Protocol Adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
Rate of adherence to protocol-data collected by study team
12 months
Drop Out
Time Frame: 12 months
Rate of drop-out from the study
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
Satisfaction with treatment process (at 6 weeks) and overall outcome (3 and 12 months) - data collected by questionnaire
6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months
Clinical outcomes-Readmissions to hospital
Time Frame: 30 days
Readmissions to hospital (number of readmissions within 30 days)
30 days
Clinical outcomes-Surgical complications
Time Frame: 72 hours
Surgical complications: specifically, wound infection (defined by intention to treat with antibiotics); urinary retention requiring intervention; post-operative bleeding requiring return to theatre
72 hours
Clinical outcomes-Return to theatre
Time Frame: 30 days
Return to theatre for a complication (within 30 days)
30 days
Clinical outcomes-patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months & 1 year
Medium term patient satisfaction (questionnaire at 3 months and 1 year)
3 months & 1 year
Clinical outcomes-functional outcomes
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months & 1 year
Functional outcomes: urinary flow rate at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year
6 weeks, 3 months & 1 year
Clinical outcomes-Subsequent penile surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
Subsequent penile surgery (other than for early complication): e.g. meatal procedure, re-do preputioplasty or circumcision
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on circumcision

Subscribe