- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02855008
Steps to Effective Problem Solving in Group Homes (STEPS)
November 29, 2022 updated by: Sarah Ailey, Rush University Medical Center
Steps to Effective Problem Solving in Group Homes for Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities
Aggressive/challenging behaviors in individuals with intellectual disability are a major public health concern for them, their families, their service programs and staff, and their communities.
This randomized clinical trial will test the efficacy and cost effectiveness of a preventive community-based social problem solving intervention, the Steps to Effective Problem-solving (STEPS), delivered in group homes.
The program uses residential staff participation and the group environment to facilitate improved social problem solving skills and reduce aggressive/challenging behaviors in this population in group homes and work settings.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aggressive/challenging behaviors (AC/Bs) are a major public health problem for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) living in group homes.
A leading reason for psychiatric hospitalizations and incarcerations, A/CBs are costly to the healthcare system, agencies and families.
Social problem solving (SPS) training programs for individuals with ID have had positive behavioral results, but most were conducted in clinical or forensic settings.
None were community-based preventive interventions, none examined whether A/CBs decreased in participants' group homes and work settings, and none addressed cost effectiveness.
In preliminary work, the investigators modified an effective SPS training program, using input from individuals with ID and residential staff, as a preventive intervention for the group home setting.
Steps to Effective Problem-solving (STEPS) includes residential staff and uses the group home environment to facilitate behavior change.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to test the efficacy of STEPS for individuals with ID. Specific aims are to 1) Assess the efficacy of the STEPS intervention in group homes to improve SPS skills and reduce A/CBs of the individuals with ID compared to an attention-control nutrition program from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 weeks, controlling for behavioral determinants of A/CBs (demographics, agency/home environment, current health).
2) Assess the mediating effect of the support environment for SPS (residential staff SPS skills, group home level SPS skills, and group cohesiveness) on the improvement of SPS skills and reductions in A/CBs.
3) Evaluate cost effectiveness of STEPS relative to usual care for A/CB incidents in group homes.
The investigators expect to show STEPS to be a preventive behavioral strategy to reduce A/CBs among individuals with ID, improve the cost effectiveness of their care and make an important incremental advance in SPS research.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
211
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- Rush University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Group home
Inclusion criteria:
- Serve individuals with mild to moderate ID;
- Have at least 10 A/CB incident reports in resident files over the prior six-month period, with at least 30% of residents in each home having incident reports in that period
- Have 4 or more residents, with a minimum of 3 agreeing to participate
- Individuals with ID and residential staff all speak English
- Have at least one residential staff members who agree to participate.
Exclusion criteria:
- If group home specifically serves individuals with ID who also have serious mental illness (e.g., severe autism, schizophrenia)
- If group home specifically serves forensic populations
- If the group home participated in previous preliminary study
Individual with ID
Inclusion criteria:
- Has mild to moderate ID (operationalized as IQ 50-75 per agency records) and mild to moderate limitations in adaptive functioning (measured by the Inventory for Client and Agency Planning used in all residential agencies in Illinois, per agency record)
- Lives in a chosen group home
- Is verbal and speaks English
Exclusion Criteria:
- If individual does not meet inclusion criteria and
- If participated in the preliminary study
Residential staff
Inclusion criteria:
- Employed as residential staff in the chosen group homes and
- Speak and read English
Exclusion criteria:
- Does not meet inclusion criteria
- Participated in the previous preliminary study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: STEPS
Experimental: Individuals with ID and residential staff in group homes receive 6 one-hour STEPS sessions over 12 weeks and a booster in week 18 following a standardized manual.
Sessions include interactive games to build group cohesiveness, along with interactive discussion and practice.
Participants are given session materials and 1-2 worksheets to practice learned skills and are asked to return the worksheets at the next session.
Residential staff are given additional materials with tips on how to help residents practice social problem-solving skills between sessions.
Highlights of each session using a standardized format are brought to the following session to help with engagement and provide cues for retention of materials.
|
Agencies providing residential services to individuals with ID gave us letters of agreement (N=9) when we submitted for funding.
We randomized these agencies and followed the specific order.
Over the past year, recruitment issues have resulted in our only being able to recruit at six of the original nine agencies.
To address the issues, we compiled a list of 15 additional local agencies within a 50 mile radius.
We are recruiting from an additional six agencies and are in contact with another four.
We also changed our recruitment criteria to include co-ed homes.
Within each agency we then, (1) determine homes that that meet criteria and, by gender (male, female, co-ed), randomize to STEPS or attention-control condition.
Residential staff are consented first.
Individuals with ID (or guardians if they have one) are then consented.
18 homes will participate in STEPS.
|
Active Comparator: Food for Life
Active Comparator: Individuals with ID and residential staff in group homes receive 6 one-hour Food for Life sessions over 12 weeks and a booster in week 18 following a standardized manual.
Sessions include interactive games regarding food and nutrition followed, along with interactive discussion and practice.
Participants are given session materials and 1-2 worksheets to practice learned skills and are asked to return the worksheets at the next session.
Residential staff are given additional materials with tips on how to help residents practice Food for Life skills between sessions.
Highlights of each session using a standardized format are brought to the following session to help with engagement and provide cues for retention of materials.
|
Agencies providing residential services to individuals with ID gave us letters of agreement (N=9) when we submitted for funding.
We randomized these agencies and followed the specific order.
Over the past year, recruitment issues have resulted in our only being able to recruit at six of the original nine agencies.
To address the issues, we compiled a list of 15 additional local agencies within a 50 mile radius We are recruiting from an additional six agencies and are in contact with another four.
We also changed our recruitment criteria to include co-ed homes.
Within each agency we then, (1) determine homes that that meet criteria and, by gender (male, female, co-ed), randomize to STEPS or attention-control condition.
Individuals with ID and staff are recruited after randomization.
Residential staff are consented first.
Individuals with ID (or guardians if they have one) are then consented.
18 homes will participate in Food for Life.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Iowa Family Interactions Rating Scales (IFIRS) Individual-level Problem-solving scales
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline Individual with ID SPS: Uses a 15-20 minute videotape of a problem-solving interaction of the group of individuals with ID living in the group home and their residential staff to assess individuals with ID SPS skills - solution quantity, solution quality, effective process, disruptive process, and negotiation/compromise at the individual level.
|
Baseline, 12, and 24 weeks
|
Problem-solving Task (PST)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12, and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline Individual with ID SPS: Has four questions on each of five problem vignettes that measure individual with ID SPS skills.
The vignettes are read by data collectors to the individuals and responses audiotaped.
|
Baseline, 12, and 24 weeks
|
The IFIRS Dyadic-interaction scales
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline Individual with ID Behaviors: Uses the same 15-20 minute videotape of a problem-solving interaction to assess individual with ID A/CBs.
Items include hostility, verbal attack, physical attack, contempt, etc. (total 22 items) of each individual with ID
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
General Maladaptive Index
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline Individual with ID Behaviors: Qualified Intellectual Disability Professionals (QIDPs) at the residential agency and work setting supervisors (sheltered workshops and employment) will be asked to fill out the GMI on participants with ID.
The GMI measures the frequency (0 = never to 5 = one or more times an hour) and severity (0 = not serious to 4 = extremely serious) of problem behaviors in eight domains (hurtful to self or others, destructive, disruptive, socially offensive, unusual/repetitive, withdrawn/inattentive, uncooperative).
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Agency incident reports
Time Frame: For 24 weeks prior to intervention, 12, 24 and 36 weeks
|
Change from baseline Individual with ID behaviors: Residential staff members fill out incident reports.
The reports are reviewed by QIDPs, kept in resident files, and tracked by the agencies.
Data will be abstracted from agency tracking records and de-identified.
The investigators will analyze counts of incidents for outcomes and summarize descriptive data of key elements of the incident reports.
|
For 24 weeks prior to intervention, 12, 24 and 36 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Iowa Family Interactions Rating Scales (IFIRS) Individual-level Problem-solving scales
Time Frame: Baseline,12 and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline Residential staff SPS (Support environment for Individual with ID).
Uses the same 15-20 minute videotape of a problem-solving interaction of the group of individuals with ID living in the group home and their residential staff to assess residential staff SPS skills - solution quantity, solution quality, effective process, disruptive process, and negotiation/compromise at the individual level.
|
Baseline,12 and 24 weeks
|
Social Problem Solving Inventory Revised - Short form (SPSI-R SF)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline Residential staff SPS (Support environment for Individual with ID).
The five dimensions of this measure are positive attitude, negative attitude, rational style, impulsive/careless style, and avoidant style.
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
IFIRS Group Problem-solving Scales
Time Frame: Baseline,12 and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline of Group (of individuals with ID and their residential staff) SPS (Support environment for Individual with ID).
The scales include problem-solving enjoyment, agreement on problem description/solution, implementation, and problem difficulty for group,
|
Baseline,12 and 24 weeks
|
Group Environment for the Intervention Scale (GEIS)
Time Frame: Week 1 and 12
|
Change from baseline of group environment - cohesiveness (Support environment of individual with ID).
The GEIS is a 25-item measure of group environments.
The three subscales are implementation and preparedness, counter-productive activity, and cohesiveness.
The GEIS will be scored using audiotapes from Sessions 1 and 6 by trained research assistants.
|
Week 1 and 12
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Life events section of Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disabilities
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline in A/CB determinant of life events: (17 items 2-recent 1-event 0-never)
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Glasgow Depression Scale for People with Learning Disabilities [GDS-LD])
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Change from baseline of A/CB determinant depression.
The GDS-LD was developed for use among individuals with ID (called "learning disabilities" in the UK).
It has a sensitivity ranging from 90-96% and specificity ranging from 83.9-90%, with a score of 13.
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Medication management
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
Background information on psychotropic medications will be gathered from agency records
|
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
|
A/CB incident costs
Time Frame: 12-36 weeks
|
Compare A/CB incident costs for experimental arm vs. active comparator arm.
The investigators will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of STEPS from the societal perspective, taking into account costs borne by the program, group home, health care system, public services, participant, and family.
The STEPS experimental arm group will be compared to usual care (active comparator Food for Life) group costs of A/CBs excluding costs of the nutrition intervention).
We will calculate the net cost (or net savings) associated with STEPS vs. Food for Life arms, such that the net cost = program-related cost - A/CB incident cost
|
12-36 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sarah H Ailey, PhD RN, Rush University Medical Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 7, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 1, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
August 4, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 1, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 29, 2022
Last Verified
November 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R01HD086211 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 1R01HD086211-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
IPD Plan Description
The investigators will share aggregated data
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Study protocol and informed consent can be shared now.
Expect to share preliminary results Fall '22
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Other researchers
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Informed Consent Form (ICF)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Problem Behavior
-
University of CyprusUnknown
-
Imperial College LondonNational Institute for Health Research, United KingdomCompletedMental Health Disorder | Child Behavior Problem | Self Injurious Behavior | Adolescent Behavior ProblemUnited Kingdom
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS); AltaMed Health...SuspendedParenting | Child Behavior Problem | Child RearingUnited States
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompletedChild Behavior Problem
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Not yet recruitingChild Behavior | Child Behavior Problem | Child Behavior Disorders | Racism
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingChild Behavior Problem | Interprofessional Relations | Multidisciplinary CommunicationUnited States
-
Muhammad IrfanUniversity of PeshawarCompletedBehavior Problem | Emotional ProblemPakistan
-
University of GondarInternational Institute for Primary Health Care-Ethiopia (IIfPHC-E)RecruitingBehavior ProblemEthiopia
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonU.S. Department of EducationCompleted
-
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of MichiganCompletedBehavior ProblemGhana
Clinical Trials on STEPS
-
University of Texas at AustinCompleted
-
Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military...The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University; Medical Center...CompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, KneeChina
-
University of MichiganEmory University; Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago; Harvard...Completed
-
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteCompletedPlasma Cell MyelomaUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaRecruitingAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Duke UniversityCompleted
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterUniversity of Michigan; Brigham and Women's Hospital; VA Boston Healthcare SystemNot yet recruitingChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Chronic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Glostrup University Hospital, CopenhagenRigshospitalet, DenmarkActive, not recruitingChronic IllnessDenmark
-
University of MichiganCompletedChronic PainUnited States