Total Neoadjuvant Induction and Consolidation CapeOX Plus IMRT With Capecitabine for MRI Defined High-risk Rectal Cancer

July 21, 2021 updated by: Aiwen Wu, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Total Neoadjuvant Induction and Consolidation CapeOX Plus Neoadjuvant Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Capecitabine for MRI Defined High-risk Rectal Cancer

This study is designed to test the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant induction and consolidation CapeOX plus neoadjuvant intensity modulated radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine for MRI defined high-risk rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This phase II trial is studying the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant treatment for MRI defined high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer.

MRI imaging features as mrT3c/T3d/T4a/T4b, threatening circumferential resection margin, mrN2 disease or extramural vascular invasion are defined as high-risk factor and proved to associated with unfavorable oncological outcome, especially for distant metastasis. Induction and consolidation chemotherapy plus radiation may increase both systemic and local control. Total neoadjuvant treatment schedule also has advantages as improved patient tolerance, early closure of defunctioning ileostomy etc.

In this study, patients with MRI defined high-risk rectal cancer will receive 3 cycles induction CapeOX, intensity modulated radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine and 2 cycles consolidation CapeOX and Total mesorectal excision.

The induction chemotherapy related G3-4 toxicity occurred in 42% of patients in GCR-3 trial (23% during RT, 19% during induction chemotherapy). It is hypothesized that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy related G3-4 toxicity rate of the present regimen will be lower than 25% (10% during IMRT, 15% during induction/consolidation chemotherapy). A sample size of 67 achieves 80% power to detect a difference (△P =17%, P1=25%, P0=42%) using a one-sided binomial test. (α= 0.05). If the number of G3-4 toxic event is 21 or less, the hypothesis that P1>= 42% is rejected. About 10 % loss to follow-up was anticipated, so an additional eight patients will be recruited. The study requires 75 subjects in all.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100142
        • Beijing Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and ≤75 years.
  • ECOG Performance status 0-1.
  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
  • The distance from down verge of tumor to anal-rectal junction (ARJ) ≤8cm based on MRI, or ≤12 cm based on sigmoidoscopy.
  • Clinical Stage T3c, T3d, T4a or T4b, or EMVI (+) or mrN2 or CRM (+) based on MRI.
  • No evidence of distant metastases.
  • No prior pelvic radiation therapy.
  • No prior chemotherapy or surgery for rectal cancer.
  • No active infections requiring systemic antibiotic treatment.
  • ANC > 1.5 cells/mm3, HGB > 10.0 g/dL, PLT > 100,000/mm3, total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, AST≤ 3 x ULN, ALT ≤ 3 x ULN.
  • Patients must read, agree to, and sign a statement of Informed Consent prior to participation in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent rectal cancer.
  • Anticipated unresectable tumor after neoadjuvant treatment.
  • Creatinine level greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Patients who have received prior pelvic radiotherapy.
  • Patients who are unable to undergo an MRI.
  • Patients with a history of a prior malignancy within the past 5 years, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer.
  • Patients with a history of any arterial thrombotic event within the past 6 months. This includes angina (stable or unstable), MI, TIA, or CVA.
  • Other Anticancer or Experimental Therapy.
  • Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • Patients with any other concurrent medical or psychiatric condition or disease which would make them inappropriate candidates for entry into this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TNT

Patients with MRI defined high-risk rectal cancer will receive chemotherapy before and after chemoradiation, and will not receive adjuvant treatment. This arm is called total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). The neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen is designed as 3 cycles of CapeOX (Capecitabine+Oxaliplatin) over a period of approximately 8 weeks. Tumor response will be evaluated after chemotherapy. Then patients will undergo 22f-IMRT (Intensity modulated radiotherapy) with capecitabine. Patients will receive two more cycles of consolidation CapeOX if tolerable when there was no progressed disease in induction CapeOX.

Finally, patients will receive TME (Total mesorectal excision) following TNT if no metastasis occurs.

Other Names:
  • OXA
Other Names:
  • CAPE
Other Names:
  • IMRT
Other Names:
  • TME

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse events
Time Frame: 3 years
Adverse events will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 3 years
The 3-year DFS will be defined as the percentage of patients alive without local recurrence or distant metastasis of disease at 3 years measured from the date of the administration of treatment.
3 years
Pathological downstaging rate
Time Frame: 1 year
The pathological result for each patient will be compared with MRI pre-stage and re-stage and downstaging rate will be recorded.
1 year
Compliance rate with neoadjuvant treatment schedule
Time Frame: 1 year
To measure the compliance rate to the total neoadjuvant treatment schedule.
1 year
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Time0: before neoadjuvant treatment; Time1: at 4 months after the completion of neoadjuvant radiation; Time2: 12 months after Time1; Time3: 24 months after Time1; Time4: 36 months after Time1

EORTC QLQ-C30 (Aaronson et al., 1993). The questionnaire assesses health status and quality of life of cancer patients using 30 items grouped in one global scale, five multi-item functioning scales, three symptom scales and six single symptom items.

The items are scored on a four-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning or a higher level of symptoms. The validity and reliability of the Mandarin versions of the questionnaire have been established.

Time0: before neoadjuvant treatment; Time1: at 4 months after the completion of neoadjuvant radiation; Time2: 12 months after Time1; Time3: 24 months after Time1; Time4: 36 months after Time1
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Colorectal Cancer Module 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29)
Time Frame: Time0: before neoadjuvant treatment; Time1: at 4 months after the completion of neoadjuvant radiation; Time2: 12 months after Time1; Time3: 24 months after Time1; Time4: 36 months after Time1

EORTC QLQ-CR29 (Whistance et al., 2009). The questionnaire measures health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer, using 29 items grouped in four functional scale and 18 symptom scale.

The items are scored on a four-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating a better level of functioning or a higher level of symptoms. The validity and reliability of the Mandarin versions of the questionnaire have been established.

Time0: before neoadjuvant treatment; Time1: at 4 months after the completion of neoadjuvant radiation; Time2: 12 months after Time1; Time3: 24 months after Time1; Time4: 36 months after Time1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Oxaliplatin

Subscribe