Combining Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Robotic Training in Upper Limb-Impaired Chronic Stroke Patients

January 23, 2020 updated by: Di Lazzaro Vincenzo, Campus Bio-Medico University
Previous studies suggested that both robot-assisted rehabilitation and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation can improve upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. Aim of present study is to explore whether the combination of these two approaches might enhance their positive effects on motor recovery. Safety and efficacy of this combination will be assessed within a proof-of-principle, double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) will be delivered at left ear, in order to improve the response to the following robot-assisted therapy. Patients with both ischemic and hemorrhagic chronic stroke will be randomized to robot-assisted therapy associated with real or sham tVNS, delivered for 10 working days. Change in Fugl-Meyer has been chosen as primary outcome, while changes in several quantitative indicators of motor performance extracted by the robot as secondary outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy, 00128
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Neurology, Campus Biomedico University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fioravante Capone, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least 1 year earlier
  • hand function impairment
  • ability to give informed consent and comprehend instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous surgical intervention on vagus nerve
  • low hearth rate (< 60 bpm)
  • cognitive impairment or any substantial decrease in alertness, language reception, or attention that might interfere with understanding instructions for motor testing
  • apraxia
  • excessive pain in any joint of the paretic extremity
  • advanced liver, kidney, cardiac or pulmonary disease
  • history of significant alcohol or drug abuse
  • depression or use of neuropsychotropic drugs such as antidepressants or benzodiazepines
  • pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robotic therapy and real tVNS
This group receives REAL vagus nerve stimulation during robotic rehabilitation.

The stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve will be performed through an electric stimulator and two Ag-AgCl electrodes placed in the left external acoustic meatus at the inner side of the tragus. For sham stimulation, electrodes will be attached to the left ear lobe. tVNS will be delivered as trains lasting 30 s and composed by 600 pulses (intra-train pulse frequency = 20 Hz; pulse duration = 0.3 ms) repeated every 5 min for 60 min. The intensity of stimulation will individually adjusted to a level ranging above the detection threshold and below the pain threshold. In this range, when possible, the investigators will chose an intensity of 8 mA.

Each day, for 10 consecutive working days, each patient will receive a session of robotic therapy during the real or sham tVNS stimulation

Active Comparator: Robotic therapy and sham tVNS
This group receives SHAM VNS during robotic rehabilitation. Sham VNS is not effective. Both groups receive the same amount of robotic rehabilitation.

The stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve will be performed through an electric stimulator and two Ag-AgCl electrodes placed in the left external acoustic meatus at the inner side of the tragus. For sham stimulation, electrodes will be attached to the left ear lobe. tVNS will be delivered as trains lasting 30 s and composed by 600 pulses (intra-train pulse frequency = 20 Hz; pulse duration = 0.3 ms) repeated every 5 min for 60 min. The intensity of stimulation will individually adjusted to a level ranging above the detection threshold and below the pain threshold. In this range, when possible, the investigators will chose an intensity of 8 mA.

Each day, for 10 consecutive working days, each patient will receive a session of robotic therapy during the real or sham tVNS stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Fugl-Meyer Score
Time Frame: immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
immediately, one months and three months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in kinematic data (Motion Accuracy) measured by the robot
Time Frame: immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
Change in kinematic data (Motion Direction) measured by the robot
Time Frame: immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
Change in kinematic data (Smoothness) measured by the robot
Time Frame: immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
Change in kinematic data (Speed) measured by the robot
Time Frame: immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
Change in kinematic data (Movement Duration) measured by the robot
Time Frame: immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
Change in kinematic data (Efficiency) measured by the robot
Time Frame: immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
immediately, one months and three months after the intervention
Incidence of adverse events that are related to treatment
Time Frame: intervention period of 10 consecutive working days
intervention period of 10 consecutive working days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation

3
Subscribe