Proficiency-Based Progression Training for Clinical Communication

July 24, 2017 updated by: Dorothy Breen, University College Cork

The Effect of a Proficiency Based Progression Training Programme for Clinical Communication on ISBAR Performance

Importance: Clinical communication is an important source of medical error and preventable adverse events.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of proficiency-based progression (PBP) simulation training for ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication in the deteriorating patient.

Setting: The study will be conducted in University College Cork, Ireland. Participants: Third year undergraduate nursing and fifth year medical students, who are scheduled to undertake ISBAR training as part of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) programme.

Intervention: Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three groups before undertaking a performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high fidelity simulation laboratory: HSE group (the national e-learning programme only); S group (national e- learning plus simulation training) and PBP group (national e-learning plus proficiency-based progression simulation).

Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The first successful simulation validation study used a proficiency-based progression methodology. Since then the approach has been successfully deployed to produce superior technical skills but has not yet been validated for non-technical (communication) skills. The ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) has been selected as the standardised tool for clinical communication in relation to an acutely deteriorating patient in many healthcare organisations worldwide, including Ireland.

The aim of this study is to explore whether proficiency-based progression (PBP) could be applied to simulation-based training for ISBAR performance to produce a superior skill set.

The study will compare performance outcomes of students, who receive the national e-learning programme only with those who receive it in combination with either standard simulation or proficiency-based progression (PBP) simulation.

Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three training groups within their professional cohort (medicine or nursing) before undertaking a performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a high fidelity simulation laboratory:

  1. Online learning only (HSE) -the national e-learning programme only
  2. Standard simulation (S) -online learning plus simulation training
  3. Proficiency based progression (PBP) -online learning plus proficiency-based progression simulation.

Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient.

All participants will be required to demonstrate a certificate of successful completion on the national e-learning programme within the previous 4 weeks as well as supplying baseline demographic information before undertaking the training.

Performance metrics have previously been identified, operationally defined and agreed upon at a modified Delphi panel meeting consisting of medical and nursing experts for a series of paper-based simulation cases and a standardised high fidelity simulation case used as the assessment case. The proficiency benchmark for each case has been set based on the performance of experienced nursing and medical personnel on each case as a series of steps, errors and critical errors.

Outcome assessment will be scored by reviewing recordings of ISBAR performance by each participant on the standardised case in the high fidelity laboratory.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cork, Ireland, T12EH31
        • University College Cork

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Third year undergraduate nursing students

Fifth year medical students

Exclusion Criteria:

Lack of consent

Failure to successfully complete the National e-learning NEWS programme

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: National e-learning programme only (HSE)
National e-learning programme only Recent successful completion the National e-learning programme by certificate will be displayed. Students then complete a student satisfaction survey and proceed directly for performance assessment to the high-fidelity simulation suite.
National e-learning programme (COMPASS)
Other Names:
  • HSE
Active Comparator: Simulation (S)
Simulation Recent successful completion of the National e-learning e-learning programme by certificate will be displayed. Students will proceed to standard simulation using the same series of paper cases as PBP which prompt simulated phone calls but no requirement to meet a proficiency benchmark. 4 hours will be allotted to this training. Following training participants will complete the student satisfaction survey and will then proceed directly for performance assessment to the high-fidelity simulation suite.
National e-learning programme (COMPASS)
Other Names:
  • HSE
Paper based simulation cases
Other Names:
  • Simulation S
Experimental: Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP)
Recent successful completion of the National e-learning programme by certificate will be displayed. Students will proceed to PBP simulation using the same series of paper cases as S which prompt simulated phone calls. PBP students will be scored according to predefined metrics and will be required to reach proficiency benchmarks. Following training participants will complete the student satisfaction survey and proceed directly for performance assessment to the high-fidelity simulation suite.
National e-learning programme (COMPASS)
Other Names:
  • HSE
Use of validated metrics and performance benchmarks to simulation training
Other Names:
  • PBP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of those reaching the benchmark on the assessment case
Time Frame: 6 months
Independent review by two blinded assessors of recorded ISBAR phone call conducted in the high fidelity simulation setting
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of completed steps
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of successfully completed steps as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of total errors
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of total errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case
6 months
Number of errors/critical errors
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of errors/critical errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anthony Gallagher, PhD, DSc, University College Cork, College Rd, Cork Ireland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Performance

Clinical Trials on National e-learning programme only

Subscribe