Utility of Samples in Bacteriological Prospective Series of Ulcers Leg Infected Clinically (ULCERINFECTE)

April 26, 2023 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Leg ulcers are defined as wounds lasting for more than a month. They would receive 0.2% of the population of Western countries. In Europe, the cost per episode of leg ulcers is estimated at 6650 euros (10 000 euros for a foot ulcer). The cost of treatment of wounds would be 2 to 4% of the health budget. Infection is the most common complication of chronic wounds: in most cases, it results in delayed healing, at most, it can result in amputation or serious general complications Bacterial contamination of ulcers is constant. Over time for over 25 years, various studies have shown about relatively identical results. The bacteria are present in over 90% of the etiology of venous leg ulcers. These bacteria are divided into four most common classes: Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas. The bacterial ecology changes over time. Indeed Staphylococcus aureus appears first, while the Pseudomonas is associated with ulcers lasting for several months. Anaerobic more difficult to find, are found in 30% of cases Cohabitation between leg ulcers and bacteria often without clinical consequence: These are the stages of infection and colonization.

The infection is related to the proliferation of bacteria and their invasion into the skin, by increasing their virulence (virulence genes acquisition). The increase in the number of bacteria and the multiplicity of bacterial genera are one reason for the increased virulence of bacteria. When bacteria proliferate, because the host defenses are inadequate, or because there is a vascular disease which promotes the proliferation, clinical signs appear

Study Overview

Detailed Description

RESEARCH PROJECT Vascular medicine at St Joseph, the management of chronic wounds concerns 80% of hospitalized patients, more than 1,000 patients per year. The reason for hospitalization of these patients outside of revascularization gestures, often performing a skin graft. The existence of an infection of the ulcer on arrival in the service is not a cons-indication for transplant, but will delay it until the signs of infection are brought under control. This scenario is common. The Medical Information department on six months, noted over 100 patients coded "leg ulcers" principal diagnosis and "soft tissue infections" secondary diagnosis.

The importance of this recruitment and the lack of recommendations for the management of these patients justifies the completion of a clinical and microbiological work Until recent months, at the request of Microbiology, bacteriological referred to biopsy was performed first line when suspected of being infected ulcer. After reading the literature, and because of the invasive nature of this gesture, the evaluation of biopsy compared to the swab in a large patient population seems to necessary to the investigators

The proposed work is randomized blinded for microbiological and observational part for the clinical part, on a prospective series of consecutive carriers of infected leg ulcer patients, regardless of the etiology of leg ulcers, excluding dermohypodermitis complicating acute bacterial leg ulcers, with several objectives:

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Demonstrate the non-inferiority of the swab compared to biopsy in the management of patients hospitalized for infected leg ulcer

two situations

  1. If graft Primary endpoint: time in days between the beginning of hospitalization and the day the transplant can be performed. Indeed, the transplants are performed when the doctor determines that the infection is under control
  2. If the patient is not grafted:

Primary endpoint: time between the beginning of hospitalization and the end of the ideal hospitalization (when the clinician believes that the patient can get out)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES and CRITERIA healing rate of patients at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months bacteriological agreement: between the swab and biopsy Comparing the interest of biopsy compared to the swab: percentage of patients for whom the unblinding was necessary and where the biopsy was more informative than the swab (different bacteria require special treatment) .

levies failure rate when the sample is sterile while the ulcer is infected clinically. The collection of demographic, etiological, nutritional profile, and the collection of various local signs can provide indicators of response to the proposed strategy. This type of study has never been done in the population of leg ulcers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile-de-France
      • Paris, Ile-de-France, France, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Man or woman over 18 years
  • Hospitalized for a leg ulcer whatever the etiology, vascular medicine
  • Having clinical criteria and / or biological that suggest infection
  • No opposition to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Arterial ulcers requiring revascularization (digging ulcers, tendon or bone exposure, necrosis, toe pressure <50 mmHg)
  • Ulcers cancer
  • Ulcers with acute bacterial cellulitis: large painful acute red leg
  • Poor understanding of the French language
  • Major hearing impairment
  • Severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: a swab according to the method of Levine
A swab according to the method of Levine: choose the pathological area by pressing the swab over the area, with a rotation supported on at least 1 cm² for 5 seconds, to well up from the liquid.
Experimental: Bacteriological referred to biopsy
Bacteriological referred to biopsy: (This is the hole protocol) Choose the pathological area, debridement of the wound to the pad and a scalpel, cleaning with betadine followed by rinsing with saline, local anesthesia with xylocaine, 6 mm punch for drawing a carrot, put into a sterile container

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of change of treatment response
Time Frame: Hour 24 and hour 72

Disappearance of at least two signs of infection from the following:

  1. abundant exudate (dry coverage compresses)
  2. local heat
  3. smelly character
  4. 50% decrease of erythema ulcerous perished And reduction in pain of at least two points on the digital scale
Hour 24 and hour 72
Assessement of the infection statue by medical examination
Time Frame: Day-1 and the Day 1 after release
The physician will answer on the CRF (Clinical Report Form) by: Yes or no
Day-1 and the Day 1 after release

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of change of the ulcer aspect
Time Frame: At Hour 0 and Hour 48
Photographs taken on arrival to 48 hours before transplantation where graft and out: proofreading blind to validate a posteriori the clinical criteria
At Hour 0 and Hour 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ULCERINFECTE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leg Ulcer

Clinical Trials on a swab according to the method of Levine

Subscribe