- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02891499
Influence of Low-level Laser Therapy on Stability and Displacement of Orthodontic Miniscrew Implants
January 17, 2018 updated by: Guido Artemio Marañón Vásquez, University of Sao Paulo
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Stability and Displacement of Orthodontic Miniscrew Implants With Mediate and Immediate Force Application
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low level laser therapy on stability and displacement of orthodontic miniscrew implants using two different force application protocols.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability and displacement of orthodontic miniscrew implants with mediate and immediate force application.
They will be assessed 48 miniscrew implants placed in patients in orthodontic treatment at the postgraduate clinical in Orthodontics, at School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo.
They will be randomly divided into 4 groups: 1- LLLT and immediate force application; 2- LLLT and force application 4 weeks after implantation; 3- immediate force application without LLLT and 4- force application 4 weeks after implantation without LLLT.
Orthodontic force of 150 gF will be applied for 3 months.
A low power laser device Therapy XT with a wavelength of 660 nm and output of 100 mW immediately after implantation (energy density: 4J/cm2), and 808 nm with 100 mW (energy density: 8J/cm2), every 48 hours for two weeks in the following applications will be used.
The stability will be assessed using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) at three times: the implantation day (T1), one month (T2) and after 3 months of force application (T3).
Stability measures will be evaluated in Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ).
To assess the amount of miniscrew implant displacement, it will be used Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) at the beginning (CT1) and final of the application of orthodontic force (CT2).
Three-dimensional models will be created in specific programs and superimpositions of CT1 and CT2 will be used to measure the distance in millimeters between inicial and final position.
The evaluation will be carried out in three points: head of miniscrew implant (point C), thread (point R) and apex of miniscrew implant (point A).
The results will be statistically analyzed according to nature of the data and the significance level to be adopted will be 5%.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
29
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
11 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient with permanent teeth.
- Use of miniscrews in orthodontic planning.
- Miniscrews placed in the labial upper and lower posterior regions.
- Patient who agree to participate (Informed consent)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with systemic disease.
- Patient with periodontal disease and/or inadequate oral hygiene.
- Use of drugs chronically.
- Patients that consume alcohol or tobacco.
- Use of fixed palatal or lingual orthodontic devices.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: LLLT + immediate force
Use of Low-level laser therapy and not mediate orthodontic force application (150 gF the day of the implantation).
|
|
Experimental: LLLT + mediate force
Use of Low-level laser therapy and mediate orthodontic force application (150 gF 4 weeks after the day of the implantation).
|
Mediate force application protocol: orthodontic force application (150 gF) 4 weeks after the day of the implantation.
|
No Intervention: Immediate force application
Not mediate orthodontic force application (150 gF the day of the implantation), without use of Low-level laser therapy.
|
|
Experimental: Mediate force application
Mediate orthodontic force application (150 gF 4 weeks after the day of the implantation), without use of Low-level laser therapy.
|
Mediate force application protocol: orthodontic force application (150 gF) 4 weeks after the day of the implantation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline miniscrew implant stability at 1 and 3 months of force application.
Time Frame: T1: Implantation day; T2: after 1 month; and, T3: after 3 months of force application.
|
It will be used a Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) equipment.
Stability measures will be evaluated using a unique unit of measure: Implant stability quotient (ISQ).
All groups will be evaluated the day of the implantation (T1) and after 1 month (T2).The last stability measure (T3) will be done 3 months after the implantation day in the groups without mediate force application, and 4 months after the implantation day in the groups with mediate force application.
|
T1: Implantation day; T2: after 1 month; and, T3: after 3 months of force application.
|
Change from baseline miniscrew implant position at 3 months of force application.
Time Frame: CT1: Implantation day; and, CT2: 3 months of orthodontic force application.
|
It will be used Cone Beam Computed tomography (CBCT).
Three-dimensional models will be created in specific programs and superimpositions of CT1 and CT2 will be used to measure the distance in millimeters between initial and final position.
|
CT1: Implantation day; and, CT2: 3 months of orthodontic force application.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Guido A Marañón Vásquez, DDS, University of Sao Paulo
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
September 7, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 18, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2018
Last Verified
January 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- USaoPaulo-1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Displacement of Other Bone Devices, Implants and Grafts
-
C. R. BardCompletedStenosis of Vascular Prosthetic Devices, Implants and GraftsUnited States
-
Medical University of ViennaParacelsus Medical UniversityUnknownOrthopedic Devices Associated With Misadventures, Prosthetic and Other Implants, Materials and Accessory DevicesAustria
-
fang guofangUnknownDefect; Internal Prosthetic Device, Implants and Grafts, Orthopedic, Bone GraftChina
-
Stryker Trauma GmbHRecruitingTraumatic Arthritis | Revision of Other Devices if Sufficient Bone Stock Remains | Fracture Humerus | Traumatic Arthropathy of ShoulderUnited States
-
King Khalid UniversityNot yet recruitingEvaluation of Osseointegration and Stability of Dental Implants in Bone Density Enhanced by Osseodensification Technique
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiCompletedDisplacement of Intervertebral Disc Without MyelopathyTurkey
-
Penn State UniversityPurdue UniversityActive, not recruitingOther Disorders of Bone Development and GrowthUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCompletedLactation | Other Disorders of Bone Density and Structure | Endocrine; ComplicationsUnited States
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedOssification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament | Intervertebral Disk Degeneration | Intervertebral Disk DisplacementKorea, Republic of
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityCompletedOrthopedic Disorder of Spine
Clinical Trials on Low-level laser therapy
-
Universidade Federal de Sao CarlosConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCompleted
-
University of Nove de JulhoSimone Aparecida Penimpedo Calamita; Fabiana Sarilho de Mendonça; Daniela Aparecida... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
St. Elisabethen Krankenhaus Frankfurt GmbHRecruitingSurgical Scar Tissue of Cesarean Section or Vaginal Tear or EpisiotomyGermany
-
University of BergenCompleted
-
University of BergenNorwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in PhysiotherapyCompleted
-
Universidade Federal de Sao CarlosFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine of... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of OttawaBioFlexTM Laser TherapyCompletedProvoked VestibulodyniaCanada
-
NYU Langone HealthCompleted
-
Universidade do Vale do SapucaiCompletedBreast Neoplasms | Radiotherapy; Adverse Effect, Dermatitis or EczemaBrazil
-
University of Nove de JulhoConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNot yet recruitingPain, Postoperative | Endodontically Treated Teeth