Retrospective Evaluation of Total Hip Replacement After Acetabular Fractures (PTHPOSTCOTYL)

February 4, 2020 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

In 1965, Emile Letournel and Robert Judet reported their experiences on acetabular fractures at the 5th day of the Raymond Poincaré Hospital in Garches. Classification Letournel is still relevant and in use today.

Many studies have sought to determine if the treatment had to be surgical or orthopedic. Although the standard treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum is the reduction and osteosynthesis, some advocate the THA in elderly patients with comminuted fracture of the acetabulum, impaction of the femoral head or acetabular impaction affecting more than 40% of the articular surface and including bearing zone. All these treatments and those supported have been studied in the literature.

However the study of the laying of total hip remote trauma after acetabular fracture osteosynthesis or treated conservatively, is not rich in literature. Only a few articles have been published in recent years.

Indeed, a recent review of the literature are nearly 11 series focusing on the results remotely hip prostheses for treatment of acetabular fracture. These two prospective series with between 21 and 63 patients. All authors report rates well above those reported complications for primary arthroplasty, with a revision of rates ranging between 0 and 26.5%.

Fractures of the acetabulum are covered in our service by one operator using the same release technique based on the stiffening. The objective of this study is to determine whether the systematic surgical treatment of these patients by an experienced operator reduces the high complication rate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

II. objectives:

  1. Evaluation of the rate and type of complications intraoperative and postoperative, and revision rates.
  2. Evaluation of clinical results based on surgical strategies.

III. Methodology

This is a single-center retrospective study single-operator regarding the evaluation of surgical practice cited in goal.

Patients were aware of the potential use of their data for medical research through oral information provided by the doctor at the signing by the patient's consent related to the surgery.

IV. Nature of the data collected

The data is anonymous and unidentifiable.

Data collected include:

  • The characteristics of the patient, as well as its history,
  • The particular technical operating data,
  • The nature of possible post-operative complications
  • The clinical and radiological assessment at follow: AP pelvic radiograph, Harris score and score Postel Merle D'aubigné.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile-de-France
      • Paris, Ile-de-France, France, 75014
        • Groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have had a fracture of the acetabulum ostéosynthèsée treated conservatively or who had a total hip replacement by secondary intention, operated at St. Joseph's Hospital between 2005 and 2013

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had a fracture of the acetabulum ostéosynthèsée treated conservatively or who had a total hip replacement by secondary intention.
  • Operated at St. Joseph's Hospital between 2005 and 2013
  • Decline minimum of one year.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Total first-line hip arthroplasty following fracture of the acetabulum made within two months following the date of the initial trauma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the success of the surgical strategy
Time Frame: month 6
According to the surgery strategy adopted, the investigators will response to the simple question. Success or not success?
month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pomme P JOUFFROY, MD, Groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PTHPOSTCOTYL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acetabular Fracture

Clinical Trials on No intervention. Observational study

Subscribe