Effects of a Training Program Based on Abacus and Other Activities in Healthy Older Adults

September 6, 2016 updated by: Rogerio Panizzutti, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a structured program, which was based on abacus training associated with other activities, administered as weekly group classes over a 7 month period in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cognitive stimulating activities are often recommended for older adults; however, little is known regarding the effects of these activities on cognition, motivation and quality of life in this population. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a structured program, which was based on abacus training associated with other activities, administered as weekly group classes over a 7 month period in older adults. Eighty-eight older adults were enrolled in an open-label controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effects of this training program on cognition, motivation and quality of life. Training had a significant effect over time; the training group maintained their level of performance on verbal learning and memory tasks, whereas the control group exhibited a significant decrease in performance from baseline to post-intervention. The subjects in the training group were more motivated to learn at study entry; however, the training had no significant effect on motivation or quality of life. Abacus training associated with other activities may benefit verbal learning and memory in older adults. Additional studies with longer follow-ups are necessary to determine whether the results of this training will have a positive effect on the lives of older adults.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Score ≥ 26 on the Mini-Mental State Examination
  • Portuguese as a native language.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A neurological or serious medical condition that would prevent participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
The individuals in the control group chose to participate in different group activities: ballroom dancing (5 participants), belly dancing (4 participants), chorus (16 participants), Spanish classes (8 participants) and chorus and Spanish classes (6 participants). The activities were offered once per week in 2 hours classes for 35 weeks and were held between April and November of 2013.
ballroom dancing (5 participants), belly dancing (4 participants), chorus (16 participants), Spanish classes (8 participants) and chorus and Spanish classes (6 participants).
Experimental: Training group
was offered in one weekly class for 2 hours for 35 weeks between April and November of 2013. The first 50 minutes were spent performing exercises with the abacus, with increasing difficulty. One or two of the following activities followed the abacus training: playing games, neurobic and group dynamics.
Training program based on abacus and other activities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reasoning score change
Time Frame: After 7 month
Reasoning score change will be measured using the Z-score of Matrix Reasoning subtest of the BETA III
After 7 month
Attention score change
Time Frame: After 7 month
Attention score change will be measured using the average of the Z-scores of the Codes subtest of the BETA III and the Cogstate Identification Task
After 7 month
Speed of processing score change
Time Frame: After 7 month
Speed of processing score change will be measured using the Z-score of the Cogstate Detection Task
After 7 month
Working memory score change
Time Frame: After 7 month
Working memory score change will be measured using the average of the Z-scores of the Cogstate One Back and Two Back tasks
After 7 month
Verbal learning and memory score change
Time Frame: After 7 month
Verbal learning and memory score change will be measured using the average of the Z-scores of the Cogstate International Shopping List and International Shopping List - Delayed Recall tasks
After 7 month
Visual learning and memory score change
Time Frame: After 7 month
Visual learning and memory score change will be measured using the average of the Z-scores of the Cogstate Continuous Paired Associate Learning, One Card Learning and Groton Maze Learning Test - Delayed Recall tasks
After 7 month
Executive function score change
Time Frame: After 7 month
Executive function score change will be measured using the average of the Z-scores of the Cogstate Groton Maze Learning Test and Set Shifting Task
After 7 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motivation
Time Frame: After 7 months
Evaluated using the self-concept scales of cognitive competence and self-learning
After 7 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: After 7 months
Evaluated using the control, autonomy, self-realization, and pleasure scale (CASP-19)
After 7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 257651

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Different group activities

Subscribe