Predictors of Outcome and Natural History in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most frequent cause of myelopathy in those over the age of 50. They claim that surgical treatment of myelopathy, especially of the mild and moderate forms, has not shown better results than conservative treatment in the long term, and criteria for the indication and the timing of the operation have not been established. In order to get some more reliable data, a long-term follow up observational study will be started to confirm the effects of long term for conservative treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most frequent cause of myelopathy in those over the age of 50 [1]. It is believed to have a generally progressive course over a period of years, with sudden acceleration especially following a slight head and neck injury, leading to significant disability [2, 3]. The treatment of CSM remains a problem, particularly in the mild and moderate forms without rapid progression.

Excellent outcomes for surgery have been presented in many studies. All of the studies, however, are retrospective, and many lack a clear design, standard criteria, control groups, and sufficient follow-up, so it is difficult to compare [4, 5, 6]. Furthermore, several studies and critical reviews are not so optimistic. They claim that surgical treatment of myelopathy, especially of the mild and moderate forms, has not shown better results than conservative treatment in the long term, and criteria for the indication and the timing of the operation have not been established [7, 8, 9]. Twenty-five percent of patients with laminoplasty suffer from severe neck and shoulder pain for more than 3 months [10], with significant morbidity from the iliac crest donor site etc. Surgery to decompress and stabilize the spine is often advocated for severe or progressive symptoms, with mixed results. About two-thirds of patients improve with surgery, whereas surgery is not successful in 15% to 30% of cases [11].

In order to get some more reliable data, a long-term follow up observational study will be started to confirm the effects of long term for conservative treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

350

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with cervical spondylosis myelopathy caused by spondylosis (including soft disc herniations) with or without developmentally narrow spinal canal

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical signs and symptoms of cervical cord dysfunction
  2. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria for cervical multisegmental cord compression and/or myelopathy due to spondylosis (including soft disc herniations) with or without developmentally narrow spinal canal
  3. Age under 75 years
  4. Patient's consent to conservative treatment It has been suggested that magnetic resonance imaging

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Spinal cord compression, without clinical symptoms
  2. Previous surgery on the cervical spine
  3. Uncertainty about the presence of significant additional diseases (such as Motor neurone disease, progressive polyarthritis)
  4. Cervical cord dysfunction due to tumors, trauma, soft disc herniation or previous surgery
  5. Serious that require a surgical procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale
Time Frame: 3 years
Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale assessed for 3 years
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Event
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
Adverse Event recorded 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
Visual Analogue Scale assessed for 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
the Medical Outcomes Study short form health survey-36
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
assessed for 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
Neck Disability Index assessed for 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 4 and 5 years
Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale assessed for 6 months, 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 years
6 months, 1, 2, 4 and 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Wang Yongjun, PhD, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai Universiy of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

individual participant data (IPD) available

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy

Clinical Trials on no specific intervention

3
Subscribe