TRansfusion Strategies in Acute Brain INjured Patients (TRAIN)

September 5, 2023 updated by: Fabio Taccone, Erasme University Hospital

Transfusion Strategies in Acute Brain Injured Patients. A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study.

To compare a "liberal" and a "restrictive" strategy to administer blood transfusions in critically ill patients with a primary brain injury.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although blood transfusions can be lifesaving in severe hemorrhage, they can also have potential complications. As anemia has also been associated with poor outcomes in critically ill patients, determining an optimal transfusion trigger is a real challenge for clinicians. This is even more important in patients with acute brain injury who were not specifically evaluated in previous large randomized clinical trials dealing with the optimal transfusion threshold. Neurological patients may be particularly sensitive to anemic brain hypoxia because of the exhausted cerebrovascular reserve, which adjusts cerebral blood flow to tissue oxygen demand.

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, pragmatic trial will compare two different strategies for red blood cell transfusion in patients with acute brain injury: a "liberal" strategy in which the aim is to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations greater than 9 g/dL and a "restrictive" approach in which the aim is to maintain Hb concentrations greater than 7 g/dL. The target population is patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

The primary outcome is neurological outcome, evaluated using the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (eGOS), at 180 days after the initial injury. Secondary outcomes include, amongst others, 28-day survival, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, the occurrence of extra-cerebral organ dysfunction/failure and the development of any infection or thromboembolic events (venous or arterial).

The estimated sample size is 794 patients to demonstrate a reduction in the primary outcome (i.e. unfavorable neurological outcome) from 50% to 30% between groups (397 patients in each arm). The study will be initiated in September 2016 in several European ICUs and is expected at least 6 years.

The results of this trial will help to improve blood product and transfusion use in this specific patient population and will provide additional data in some sub-groups of patients at high-risk of brain ischemia, such as those with intracranial hypertension or cerebral vasospasm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

850

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1070
        • Hopital Erasme

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 13 on randomization
  • Expected ICU stay > 72 hours
  • hemoglobin (Hb) concentration ≤ 9 g/dL within 10 days from brain injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Post-anoxic coma; status epilepticus without underlying brain injury; central nervous system (CNS) infections (community-acquired; hospital-acquired; ventriculitis; post-operative)
  2. Known previous neurological disease, causing significant cognitive and/or motor handicap
  3. ICH due to arterio-venous malformation (AVM) or brain tumor
  4. Inability (religious reasons) or reduced ability (lack of compatible blood) to receive blood products
  5. Active and uncontrolled bleeding at the time of enrollment
  6. GCS of 3 with both pupils fixed and dilated; brain death or imminent death (within 24 hours)
  7. Pregnancy
  8. Medical need to correct anemia (e.g., active coronary disease or severe cardiac disease) with target Hb levels > 9 g/dL
  9. do-not-escalate (DNE) orders
  10. Previous allo-immunization due to transfusion, limiting red blood cells (RBC) availability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Restrictive Transfusion Strategy
"Blood Transfusion" will be given when hemoglobin concentration will be below 7 g/dL (as suggested by current guidelines in "general" ICU population)
Patients will be randomized when hemoglobin levels will be below 9 g/dl. Patients randomized to the "Restrictive Transfusion Strategy" will receive blood transfusion whenever their Hb concentration is < 7 g/dl. All patients should preferably receive one unit of blood transfusion at a time. The duration of the intervention is 28 days after randomization or until hospital discharge. Daily assessment of hemoglobin levels are mandatory only during the ICU stay. No other procedures and or interventions are scheduled. General management of patients will be conducted according to international guidelines; however, local protocols and procedures are allowed.
Other: Liberal Transfusion Strategy
"Blood Transfusion" will be given when hemoglobin concentration will be below 9 g/dL
Patients will be randomized when hemoglobin levels will be below 9 g/dl. Patients randomized to the "Liberal Transfusion Strategy" will receive blood transfusion whenever their Hb concentration is < 7 g/dl. All patients should preferably receive one unit of blood transfusion at a time. The duration of the intervention is 28 days after randomization or until hospital discharge. Daily assessment of hemoglobin levels are mandatory only during the ICU stay. No other procedures and or interventions are scheduled. General management of patients will be conducted according to international guidelines; however, local protocols and procedures are allowed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unfavorable Neurological Outcome
Time Frame: 180 days after randomization
Unfavorable neurological outcome is defined by the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (eGOS) of 1-5
180 days after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days Survival
28 days
Changes in the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) over time
Time Frame: 28 days
modification of GCS from admission over the first week and vs. the last available
28 days
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: 180 days
length of ICU stay
180 days
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: 180 days
length oh hospital stay
180 days
Presence and severity of extra-cerebral organ dysfunction/failure
Time Frame: 28 days
Daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score
28 days
Infection rate
Time Frame: 28 days
Occurrence of any infection over the first 28 days after randomization
28 days
Composite outcome
Time Frame: 28 days
Death and Organ Failure (defined as at least one extra-cerebral organ failure, according to the specific SOFA sub-score > 2)
28 days
Brain Oxygen Pressure
Time Frame: 28 days
Absolute values of brain oxygen pressure (PbO2) for those patients where this neuromonitoring has been implemented, according to the decision of the attending physician
28 days
Daily Fluid Balance
Time Frame: 28 days
Assessment of the daily fluid balance
28 days
Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time Frame: 28 days
Any of the "SAE" as described in the study protocol
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 13, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Transfusion

Clinical Trials on Restrictive Transfusion Strategy

3
Subscribe