Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease (FOCUS)

October 28, 2020 updated by: Jeffrey L Carson, MD, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Functional Outcomes in Cardiovascular Patients Undergoing Surgical Hip Fracture Repair (FOCUS)

The purpose of this study is to compare liberal red blood cell transfusion therapy with restrictive red blood cell transfusion therapy in surgical patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

Red blood cell transfusions are an extremely common medical intervention in both the United States and worldwide; over 14 million units of blood are transfused in the United States. Between 60 and 70 percent of all blood is transfused in the surgical setting. Despite the common use of red blood cell transfusions, the threshold for transfusion has not been adequately evaluated and is very controversial. A decade ago, the standard of care was to administer a peri-operative transfusion whenever the hemoglobin (Hgb) level fell below 10 g/dl (the "10/30 rule"). Concerns about the safety of blood, especially with respect to HIV and hepatitis, and the absence of data to support a 10 g/dl threshold led to the current standard of care, which is to administer blood transfusions based on the presence of symptoms, and not a specific Hgb/hematocrit level. However, there have not been any randomized clinical trials done with surgical patients that have tested the efficacy and safety of withholding blood until the patient develops symptoms, or the "10/30" approach to transfusion. Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are at greatest risk of adverse effects from reduced Hgb levels.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

This is a multi-center randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dl (liberal transfusion) in improving patient outcome. This will be compared to the restrictive (symptomatic) transfusion strategy in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia or Hgb less than 8 g/dL. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two transfusion strategies. The liberal (10 g/dl) threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dl through hospital discharge. Restrictive (Symptomatic) transfusion strategy patients will receive red blood cell transfusions for symptoms of anemia, although transfusion is also permitted, but not required, if the Hgb level falls below 8 g/dl. Outcomes will include functional recovery (primary outcome: ability to walk 10 feet across a room without human assistance or death 60 days post-randomization), lower extremity activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, survival up to 60-days and long-term, disposition (i.e., nursing home placement), and postoperative complications (e.g., myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or death in hospital, pneumonia, wound infection, thromboembolism, stroke).

Ambulation at 60 days is known to be highly predictive of ultimate functional outcome as well as of mortality at one year. Because inability to walk has such important implications for quality of life, and because it is a common problem, it far outweighs the small risk of viral infection or other complications from transfusion in elderly patients.

The trial will also evaluate the effect of transfusion threshold on postoperative risk of acute cardiac ischemia. The strategy will be to enhance surveillance for ischemic events by increasing the number of EKG and serum troponin measurements beyond those already called for in the original FOCUS protocol.

There is an ancillary study to the trial (R01 HL085706) to examine delirium as an outcome in a subsample of 139 patients. We will assess short-term (in hospital) and longer-term (after 30 days) severity of delirium.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2016

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has undergone surgical repair for a hip fracture
  • Has a postoperative Hgb level below 10 g/dL within three days of surgery
  • Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or peripheral vascular disease) or cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, or creatinine levels greater than 2.0 mg/dL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to walk prior to hip fracture
  • Declines blood transfusions
  • Suffered multiple traumas
  • Pathologic fracture of the hip due to malignancy
  • Clinically recognized acute myocardial infarction within the 30 days prior to study entry
  • Previously participated in the trial and fractured the other hip
  • Symptoms associated with anemia (e.g., ischemic chest pain) or actively bleeding at the time of randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy
Transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL.
This transfusion strategy will maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL. This threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dL through hospital discharge or up to 30 days after randomization.
Active Comparator: 2
Symptomatic transfusion strategy, a more conservative strategy, in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia.
Transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms from anemia (i.e., chest pain or ECG changes thought to be ischemic, congestive heart failure, unexplained tachycardia or hypotension unresponsive to fluids) or until the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL. Transfusion is permitted, but is not mandatory, if the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inability to Walk 10 Feet or Across a Room Without Human Assistance or Death
Time Frame: 60 days after randomization
ascertained via telephone follow-up
60 days after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, or Death for Any Reason
Time Frame: In-hospital
In-hospital
Mortality at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Mortality at 60 Days
Time Frame: 60 Days
60 Days
Composite Outcomes (a) Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Pneumonia and b) Death, Myocardial Infarction, Pneumonia, Thromboembolism, or Stroke
Time Frame: In-hospital
In-hospital
Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: In-hospital
In-hospital
Postoperative Complications (e.g., Wound Infection, Thromboembolism, Stroke)
Time Frame: In hospital
In hospital
Disposition Status (i.e., Nursing Home Placement)
Time Frame: 60 days
Nursing Home Residence
60 days
Function - Lower Extremity Activities of Daily Living,at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days
Using the Functional Status Index, score range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
30 days
Function - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days
Using the Older Americans Resources and Services Functional Assessment Questionnaire, score range from 0 to 4, higher scores indicating greater dependency
30 days
Function - Fatigue/Energy, at 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 days
Using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illnesses Therapy-Fatigue, score range from 0 to 52, higher scores indicating greater level of energy
30 days
Function - Lower Extremity Activities of Daily Living. at 60 Days
Time Frame: 60 Days
Scale range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
60 Days
Function - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, at 60 Days
Time Frame: 60 Days
Scale range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
60 Days
Function - Fatigue/Energy, at 60 Days
Time Frame: 60 Days
Scale ranging from 0 to 52, higher scores indicating greater level of energy
60 Days
Length of Stay in Hospital for United States Participants
Time Frame: Days from randomization to discharge
Days from randomization to discharge
Length of Stay in Hospital for Canadian Participants
Time Frame: Days from randomization to discharge
Days from randomization to discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jeffrey L. Carson, MD, University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Terrin, University of Maryland, College Park

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2003

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2003

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2003

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy

3
Subscribe