Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Between Two Methods of Correcting Misaligned Teeth

July 26, 2017 updated by: Damascus University

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Between Piezosurgery-assisted Corticotomy Versus Traditional Method of Aligning Crowded Lower Anterior Teeth: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Applying flapless piezocision corticotomies on the alveolar bone and separating anterior mandibular teeth using a piezosurgery device (i.e. ultrasonic waves that perform very accurate incisions without any sutures following this procedure) may improve the speed of tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment. This study consists of two groups, patients will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups. The levels of pain and discomfort of this procedure on 18 patients (experimental group) will be evaluated,whereas the second group (control group) will receive a traditional orthodontic therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

According to the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO), the length of comprehensive orthodontic treatment ranges between 18-30 months, depending on treatment options and individual characteristics. In addition, orthodontic treatment time ranges between 25-35 months for extraction therapies, respectively. Reducing orthodontic treatment time is one of the main goals for orthodontists, due to problems such as root resorption, periodontal disease and caries that are associated with prolonged treatment time.

Many techniques have been introduced to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement; surgical and non-surgical. The surgical approach is the most clinically applied and most tested with known predictions and stable results. Surgical approaches usually vary from total block osteotomies to flapless partial corticotomies .In spite of corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment efficiency, the invasiveness of these procedures (i.e. requiring full mucoperiosteal flaps elevation) might have limited their widespread acceptance among orthodontists and patients. Therefore, more conservative flapless corticotomy techniques have recently been proposed. These procedures can be accomplished in a reasonably short periods that might produce less pain and discomfort, so we will gain better patient acceptance. Although various techniques of flapless corticotomy have been reported to be successful in practice, scientific evidence on their acceptance and compatibility is little in the literature.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, DM20AM18
        • Departments of Orthodontics and Oral and Maxillofcial Surgery, University of Damascus Dental School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult healthy patients , Male and female, Age range: 16-26 years.
  2. Severe crowding ≤ 7 (Little's irregularity index)
  3. Permanent occlusion.
  4. Exist all the Mandibular teeth (except third molars).
  5. Good oral and periodontal health:

    • Probing depth<4 mm
    • No radiographic evidence of bone loss .
    • Gingival index≤ 1
    • Plaque index ≤ 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical problems that affect tooth movement (corticosteroid, NSAIDs, …)
  2. Patients have anti indication for oral surgery ( medical - social - psycho)
  3. Presence of primary teeth in the mandibular arch
  4. Missing permanent mandibular teeth (except third molars).
  5. Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease:

    • Probing depth ≥ 4 mm
    • radiographic evidence of bone loss
    • Gingival index > 1
    • Plaque index > 1
  6. Patient had previous orthodontic treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Piezosurgery
Piezosurgery-assisted corticotomy will be performed to enhance teeth alignment
The surgical tip is going to be used to make small cuts into the cortex of the alveolar bone between the crowded teeth.
Other Names:
  • Piezocision
No Intervention: Traditional method
No intervention is going to be applied to the patients in this group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Levels of Pain and Discomfort at one day
Time Frame: at 24 hours following the engagement of first initial arch wire in the brackets
Pain and discomfort will be measured on visual analog scale
at 24 hours following the engagement of first initial arch wire in the brackets
Levels of Pain and Discomfort at seven days
Time Frame: at seven days following the onset of orthodontic treatment
Pain and discomfort will be measured on visual analog scale
at seven days following the onset of orthodontic treatment
Levels of Pain and Discomfort at 14 days
Time Frame: at 14 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment
Pain and discomfort will be measured on visual analog scale
at 14 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment
Levels of Pain and Discomfort at 28 days
Time Frame: at 28 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment
Pain and discomfort will be measured on visual analog scale
at 28 days following the onset of orthodontic treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Omar Gibreal, DDS, MSc student, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University of Damascus Dental School
  • Study Director: Bassel Brad, DDS MSc PhD, Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Univ. of Damascus Dental School
  • Study Director: Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD, Associate Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Piezosurgery

3
Subscribe