Evaluation of Outcomes of CRT and MitraClip for Treatment of Low Ejection Fraction and Functional Mitral Regurgitation in HF (EVOLVE-HF)

February 26, 2020 updated by: Montreal Heart Institute

Evaluation of Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and MitraClip for the Treatment of Low Ejection Fraction and Functional Mitral Valve Regurgitation in Heart Failure

At present, the optimal treatment strategy for heart failure patients and moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) mitral regurgitation with a class IIa recommendation for CRT is uncertain.Whether these patents should also be treated for functional mitral regurgitation or with CRT also remains unclear. We therefore propose a randomized 2x2 factorial design in this patient population to understand the the impact of both CRT and transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip on their functional status and quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptomatic moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) functional mitral regurgitation due to cardiomyopathy of either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology as determined by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), and confirmed by the Echocardiography Core Lab (ECL);
  2. Symptomatic heart failure as defined by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, III or ambulatory IV;
  3. Treatment and compliance with optimal medical therapy for heart failure for at least 30 days; Optimal medical therapy is defined by: Maximum tolerated beta-blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and aldosterone antagonist (as per the ACCF/AHA Guidelines as judged by the HF specialist investigator on site and confirmed by the Clinical Eligibility Committee).
  4. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, as assessed by any one of the following methods: echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, gated blood pool scan or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI);
  5. Class IIa indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy:

    1. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS duration of 120-149 ms;
    2. Right bundle branch block (RBBB) and QRS ≥ 150 ms.
  6. Clinical agreement amongst local investigators that the patient will not be offered surgical intervention;
  7. The primary regurgitant jet, in the opinion of the MitraClip implanting investigator, can successfully be treated by the MitraClip. Treatment of commissural mitral regurgitation may be treated at the discretion of the operator. All major jets contributing the secondary MR will be treated with the MitraClip;
  8. Ability to perform a six-minute walk test (6MWT) without substantial physical limitations and without use of a walker or wheelchair and distance walked in 6 minutes of ≤ 450m;
  9. Ability and willingness to give written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Life expectancy less than 12 months due to noncardiac conditions;
  2. ACC/AHA Stage D Heart Failure;
  3. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 15%;
  4. Hypotension (systolic pressure <90 mm Hg) or requirement for inotropic support or mechanical hemodynamic support;
  5. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status 1 heart transplantation or prior orthotopic heart transplantation;
  6. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization;
  7. CABG within prior 30 days;
  8. Percutaneous coronary intervention within prior 30 days;
  9. Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requiring continuous daytime home oxygen or chronic oral corticosteroid therapy;
  10. Previous surgical mitral valve bioprosthesis, mitral annuloplasty, or transcatheter mitral valve procedure;
  11. Positive pregnancy test, or woman of child bearing potential not using highly effective methods of contraception;
  12. Mitral valve area <4.0 cm2 as assessed by planimetry of the mitral valve;
  13. Subjects in whom trans-esophageal echocardiography is contraindicated or high risk;
  14. Mitral leaflet anatomy which may preclude MitraClip implantation:

    1. Perforated mitral leaflets or clefts, lack of primary or secondary chordal support;
    2. Severe calcification in the grasping area;
    3. Rheumatic valve disease.
  15. Previously implanted Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Defibrillator (CRT-D) system;
  16. Stroke or transient ischemic event within 30 days before randomization;
  17. Modified Rankin Scale >4 disability;
  18. Need for emergent or urgent surgery for any reason or any planned cardiac surgery within the next 12 months;
  19. Severe renal impairment defined as an Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m2 as calculated by the Modification in Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula;
  20. Severe anemia requiring transfusional support or therapy with erythropoietin;
  21. Physical evidence of right-sided congestive heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction;
  22. Aortic valve disease requiring surgery or transcatheter intervention;
  23. Significant tricuspid valve disease requiring surgical intervention or very severe tricuspid regurgitation;
  24. Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy;
  25. Active endocarditis or active rheumatic heart disease or leaflets degenerated from rheumatic disease;
  26. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation;
  27. Any condition making it unlikely the patient will be able to complete all protocol procedures (including compliance with guideline directed medical therapy) and follow-up visits;
  28. Presence of any of the following:

    1. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) > 70 mm Hg confirmed by right heart catheterization;
    2. Infiltrative cardiomyopathies.
  29. Any other condition(s) that would compromise the safety of the patient as judged by the site principal investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: MitraClip/Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) and CRT ON
Patient to be implanted with both MitraClip and CRT-D. Will also receive optimal medical therapy. CRT-D will be programmed to ON
The MitraClip Clip Delivery System is indicated for the percutaneous reduction of significant symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR ≥ 3+) due to primary abnormality of the mitral apparatus [degenerative MR] in patients who have been determined to be at prohibitive risk for mitral valve surgery by a heart team, which includes a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in mitral valve disease, and in whom existing comorbidities would not preclude the expected benefit from reduction of the mitral regurgitation.
Optimal medical therapy administered as per the Guideline Direct Medical Therapy (GDMT) as defined in the 2013 ACCF/AHA Heart Failure Guidelines with maximum tolerated doses of an ACE-inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker
Other Names:
  • OMT
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with defibrillation therapy devices will be implanted according to the Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for implanted devices.
Other Names:
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Defibrillator
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: MitraClip/OMT and CRT OFF
Patient to be implanted with both MitraClip and CRT-D. Will also receive optimal medical therapy. CRT-D will be programmed to OFF until the 6-month follow-up visit in which the CRT will be turned ON
The MitraClip Clip Delivery System is indicated for the percutaneous reduction of significant symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR ≥ 3+) due to primary abnormality of the mitral apparatus [degenerative MR] in patients who have been determined to be at prohibitive risk for mitral valve surgery by a heart team, which includes a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in mitral valve disease, and in whom existing comorbidities would not preclude the expected benefit from reduction of the mitral regurgitation.
Optimal medical therapy administered as per the Guideline Direct Medical Therapy (GDMT) as defined in the 2013 ACCF/AHA Heart Failure Guidelines with maximum tolerated doses of an ACE-inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker
Other Names:
  • OMT
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with defibrillation therapy devices will be implanted according to the Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for implanted devices.
Other Names:
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Defibrillator
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: OMT and CRT ON

Patient to be implanted with only the CRT-D and will receive optimal medical therapy.

CRT-D will be programmed to ON

Optimal medical therapy administered as per the Guideline Direct Medical Therapy (GDMT) as defined in the 2013 ACCF/AHA Heart Failure Guidelines with maximum tolerated doses of an ACE-inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker
Other Names:
  • OMT
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with defibrillation therapy devices will be implanted according to the Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for implanted devices.
Other Names:
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Defibrillator
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: OMT and CRT OFF

Patient to be implanted with only the CRT-D and will receive optimal medical therapy.

CRT-D will be programmed to OFF until the 6-month follow-up visit in which the CRT will be turned ON

Optimal medical therapy administered as per the Guideline Direct Medical Therapy (GDMT) as defined in the 2013 ACCF/AHA Heart Failure Guidelines with maximum tolerated doses of an ACE-inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker
Other Names:
  • OMT
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with defibrillation therapy devices will be implanted according to the Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for implanted devices.
Other Names:
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Defibrillator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in distance walked on a six-minute walk test (6MWT)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cardiographic endpoints
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Mitral regurgitation severity
Baseline to 6 months
Change in cardiographic endpoints
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVi)
Baseline to 6 months
Change in cardiographic endpoints
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Quality of Life Assessment scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Quality of Life Assessment scores
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ5DL)
Baseline to 6 months
Number of Re-hospitalizations for decompensated heart failure
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
6 and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wearable activity/heart rate sensor (Fitbit Charge 2)
Time Frame: 12 months

Assessments obtained from the wearable activity/heart rate sensor:

  • Mean daily heart rate
  • Daily heart rate range calculated as the difference between min and max heart rate
  • number of daily steps
  • number of daily hours of sleep
12 months
Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 12 months

Time to major adverse cardiac events:

  • Cardiovascular death
  • All -cause mortality
  • non-fatal Myocardial Infarction
  • fatal and non-fatal stroke
  • rehospitalization for decompensated heart failure
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anita Asgar, MD, Montreal Heart Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on MitraClip

Subscribe