Spinal Versus Caudal Analgesia After Pediatric Infra-umbilical Surgery (ITVSEpidural)

January 12, 2021 updated by: Hala Saad Abdel-Ghaffar, Assiut University

Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of Spinal Versus Caudal Block in Pediatric Infra-umbilical Surgery

Caudal analgesia along with general anesthesia is a very popular regional technique for prolonged postoperative analgesia in different pediatric surgical procedures where the surgical site is sub-umbilical. Caudal anesthetics usually provide analgesia for approximately 4-6 hours.

Recently, the use of spinal anesthesia in infants and children requiring surgeries of sub-umbilical region is gaining considerable popularity worldwide.

- The ease of performance and the safety regarding cardio-respiratory functions makes spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in infants and children undergoing surgeries of sub-umbilical regions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The historic view that young children neither respond to, nor remember, painful experiences to the same degree as adults is no longer thought to be true. About 40% of pediatric surgical patients experienced moderate or severe postoperative pain and 75% had insufficient analgesia.

-Pediatric acute pain services use techniques of concurrent or co-analgesia based on four classes of analgesics, namely local anesthetics, opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and acetaminophen (paracetamol).

Caudal analgesia along with general anesthesia is a very popular regional technique for prolonged postoperative analgesia in different pediatric surgical procedures where the surgical site is sub-umbilical. Caudal anesthetics usually provide analgesia for approximately 4-6 hours.

Recently, the use of spinal anesthesia in infants and children requiring surgeries of sub-umbilical region is gaining considerable popularity worldwide.

- The ease of performance and the safety regarding cardio-respiratory functions makes spinal anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia in infants and children undergoing surgeries of sub-umbilical regions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Assiut Governorate
      • Assiut, Assiut Governorate, Egypt, 715715
        • Hala Saad Abdel-Ghaffar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 2-12 years.
  • Weight: 15-40 kg.
  • Sex: both males and females.
  • ASA physical status: 1-II.
  • Operation: surgery below umbilicus.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic reaction to local anesthetics (LAs).
  • Local or systemic infection (risk of meningitis).
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Intracranial hypertension.
  • Hydrocephalus.
  • Intracranial hemorrhage.
  • Parental refusal.
  • Hypovolemia.
  • Spinal deformities, such as spina bifida or myelomeningocele.
  • Presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because of a risk of shunt infection or dural leak.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Spinal group

Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg will be give by lumber puncture that will be made in the lateral position at the L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace with a 25 G pencil point Quincke spinal needle with a short bevel and the orifice of the spinal needle will be turned cephalad.

be given by .

The lumber puncture will be made in the lateral position at the L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace with a 25 G pencil point Quincke spinal needle with a short bevel and the orifice of the spinal needle will be turned cephalad.
Other Names:
  • Marcain
Active Comparator: Caudal group
caudal plain bupivacaine 2.5mg/kg 0.25% will be given caudally in The sacral hiatus between the sacral conru that will be palpated. While inserting the 23-G needle at 45° to the skin in the midline, a distance "give" or "pop" will be felt as the needle passes the sacral ligament into the caudal space, the needle will be tilted more toward the skin surface and inserted 2-3mm deeper.
The sacral hiatus between the sacral conru will be palpated. While inserting the 23-G needle at 45° to the skin in the midline, a distance "give" or "pop" will be felt as the needle passes the sacral ligament into the caudal space, the needle will be tilted more toward the skin surface and inserted 2-3mm deeper.
Other Names:
  • Bucain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLACC Score
Time Frame: 24 hours
FLACC scores will be recorded.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total consumption of rescue analgesics
Time Frame: 24 hours
The total consumption of postoperative rescue analgesics will be recorded.
24 hours
Postoperative Agitation
Time Frame: 60 min.
Postoperative agitation will be evaluated by the Four Point Agitation Sedation scale.
60 min.
Adverse effects
Time Frame: 24 hours
Any adverse effect will be treated and recorded.
24 hours
Residual motor paralysis
Time Frame: 6 hours
By the Modified Bromage scale
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hala S Abdel-Ghaffar, MD, Assisstant professor in anesthesia and intensive care, faculty of medicine, Assiut university, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25mg/kg 0.5%

3
Subscribe