Zurich Fistula Cohort Study

December 21, 2016 updated by: Benjamin Misselwitz, University of Zurich

Assessment of the Natural History and Treatment Outcomes for Patients With Fistula - a Pro- and Retrospective Cohort Study

This is a pro- and retrospective cohort study to evaluate the natural history and outcome of various treatment options of patients with fistula. At each clinical visit parameters describing activity of a fistula, potential underlying Crohn's disease, investigations as well as the current treatment will be entered into a database. Selected patients can also be contacted by phone in the form of a structured interview. Data will be analyzed to determine treatment outcomes, characterize the natural history as well as risk factors for complications of treatment and an unfavorable disease course. The same data will be obtained and analyzed retrospectively from patients who visited the clinic prior to January 2017.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fistulizing disease remains a frequent and severe problem for patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Life-time prevalence of fistula for patients with CD has been estimated to be 17 - 50% [1-5] with a cumulative incidence of 33% and 50% after 10 years and 20 years disease duration, respectively. These numbers have been confirmed by population-based studies [6, 7].

Patients with CD and fistula have a decreased quality of life. Reasons include perianal pain, discharge from the vagina, abdominal wall, perianal region and urinary tract infections. Fistula are frequently associated with abscess formation [8]. Unfortunately, surgical and medical treatment options for fistula for CD patients remain limited. Treatment with the tumor-necrosis factor (TNF) antibody infliximab remains the best medical treatment option available: At least temporary fistula closure is observed for 55% of treated fistula (compared to 12% for placebo). However, treatment success is frequently limited to a short time period of 3 month [9, 10]: 34% of all fistula patients experience recurrent fistula despite therapy [6] and successful treatment is limited to one third patients. For these reasons, up to 82% of all fistula need surgical treatment. Surgical options include non-cutting setons, application of fibrin glue as a "fistula plug", ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) and reparative surgery including mucosal advancement flaps. However, surgical therapy for fistula patients can be complicated by slow wound healing, recurrent disease and additional problems [11].

Combined medical and surgical treatment for patients with fistula and CD can significantly improve clinical outcomes [12-15]. However, the best combination of clinical and surgical methods has yet to be determined [16]. Open questions include timing of seton removal and outcomes of the various surgical procedures for different patient groups.

At the University Hospital Zurich (USZ) the investigators recently started a combined surgical and gastroenterological clinic for patients with fistula. In the new clinic patients are seen by gastroenterologists and surgeons and the investigators are aiming for joint treatment decisions. Due to this combination of expertise and improved access to gastroenterological and surgical resources the investigators are expecting better treatment results for the patients and improved satisfaction for patients and referring physicians.

With the current study the investigators want to achieve the following objectives:

  • Continuous monitoring of the quality of medical and surgical treatment
  • Determining the outcome of various fistula therapies and calculating risk factors for a favorable and unfavorable outcome
  • Understanding the natural history of perianal fistula and calculate risk factors for a favorable and unfavorable outcome.

The investigators are therefore proposing a pro- and retrospective database containing data regarding the clinical history, patient symptoms, examinations, lab values as well as other parameters. The database will be used for quality management regarding the daily work at USZ and to improve understanding regarding treatment options and the natural history of fistula. The investigators expect significant benefits for future patients from their analysis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with fistulae

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fistula
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age under 18
  • retrospective analysis: documented rejection of clinical research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Fistula
Patients with Fistulaê that are not caused by Crohn's disease
Fistula and Crohn's disease
Patients with Fistulae that are caused by underlying Crohn's disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Perianal disease activity index (PDAI)
Time Frame: 6 months after intervention
6 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Fistula Drainage assessment
Time Frame: 3, 6 & 12months after intervention
3, 6 & 12months after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn Disease

3
Subscribe