The Menopause Transition: Estrogen Variability, Stress Reactivity and Mood (Changes)

The Menopause Transition: Estrogen Variability, HPA Axis and Affective Symptoms

Women in the menopause transition ('perimenopause') are exposed to extreme hormone variability, tend to experience a unique set of severe stressors (e.g., divorce, death of loved ones), and are also at substantially elevated risk to suffer from mood and anxiety disorders. The purpose of this research is to understand the mechanisms by which variability in estradiol (E2) is associated with the symptoms of anxiety and anhedonia (loss of interest and pleasure - a common symptom of depression). By stabilizing E2 variability with a hormonal manipulation, this research will determine the degree to which the E2 variability (or E2 levels) plays a causal role in perimenopausal anxiety and anhedonia symptoms and whether it does so by affecting biological responses to stress.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Framed within a diathesis-stress model, the primary objective of this research is to determine the pathophysiological mechanisms of estradiol (E2) in the clinical anxiety and anhedonia seen in the menopause transition (MT). Specifically whether E2 variability or E2 levels predict exaggerated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity and impaired recovery to stress and, in turn, deficits in behavioral indices of threat responsivity and approach motivation and symptoms of anxiety and anhedonia. The secondary objective of the research is to use a hormonal manipulation as a mechanistic probe to stabilize E2 variability in premenopausal ranges and determine if: a) HPA axis reactivity/recovery represents a biomarker of behavioral and symptom responses to E2 stabilization; b) whether recent severe life stress predicts the HPA axis response to hormone stabilization.

A total of 170 women in the early or late MT who are eligible for the hormonal probe will be recruited to reflect the full continuum of anxiety and anhedonia symptoms based on self-report to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, respectively. However, the investigators will over-represent the clinically impairing end of the anxious and anhedonic phenotype (75% of the sample). Over an 8-week baseline, anxiety and anhedonia symptoms and serum E2 measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) will be assessed on a weekly basis. At baseline week 8, HPA axis (plasma cortisol and ACTH) response to the Trier Social Stress Test and behavioral measures of threat responsivity (via Dot-Probe task) and approach motivation (Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task 'EEfRT') will be determined. Using transdermal E2 as a pharmacological probe to stabilize variability of E2 in premenopausal ranges, women will then be randomized to transdermal E2 (0.10 mg) or placebo for 16 weeks. This is not a clinical efficacy trial. The investigators will use an randomized control trial (RCT) design with a hormonal manipulation in order to investigate the pathophysiologic role of E2 variability (or E2 levels) in HPA axis dysregulation and, in turn, threat responsivity and approach motivation. Serum E2 will be assessed weekly during weeks 9-16, and HPA axis reactivity to stress and behavioral responses to the Dot-Probe and EEfRT tasks will be assessed every four weeks during the 16 week probe.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517
        • UNC SHARRP Lab
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Susan Girdler, PhD, Principal Investigator

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Perimenopausal (either early perimenopause, defined as menstrual cycle length 7+ days longer or shorter than usual; or the late perimenopause, defined as ≥2 skipped cycles and an interval of amenorrhea ≥60 days but within one year of the last menstrual period)
  • 45 to 60 years of age
  • must be medically healthy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including coronary artery disease, arteriosclerosis, heart attack, or stroke
  • Type I or II diabetes
  • personal history of thrombotic events
  • personal or family history suggesting elevated risk for E2-related cancer
  • currently experiencing migraine headaches with aura

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Patch and Placebo Capsule
Placebo patches worn for 16 weeks. On the 9th week of patch, oral placebo capsule taken daily for 12 days. Following the 16 weeks of patch use oral placebo capsule taken daily for 12 days.
Matching placebo patches to be worn every day for 16 weeks (patch changed every 7 days).
Other Names:
  • Placebos
Matching placebo capsules will be administered orally every day for 12 days during the 9th week of randomization and again following randomization at the 17th week.
Other Names:
  • Placebos
Active Comparator: Estradiol patch and progesterone capsule
Estradiol patches worn for 16 weeks. On the 9th week of patch, oral progesterone capsule taken daily for 12 days. Following the 16 weeks of estradiol patch use oral progesterone capsule taken daily for 12 days.
Transdermal Estradiol worn daily for 16 weeks (patch changed every 7 days).
Other Names:
  • Climara
  • Prometrium
Micronized progesterone (200 mg) will be administered every day for 12 days during the 9th week of randomization and again following randomization at the 17th week
Other Names:
  • Progesterone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Over Time in the Anxiety Score From State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
The State-Trait anxiety inventory is consists of 20 questions on a 4-point force-choice Likert-type response scales (scores 0 - 3). The 20 questions are summed together for final score. The score can range from 0 to 60 with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety. Change over time is defined as the difference in the least square means between timepoints and 95% confidence interval limits.
Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Change Over Time in Anhedonia Score From Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Anhedonia will be assessed using SHAPS scores which range from 14-56, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of anhedonia. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between time points and 95% confidence interval limits.
Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Over Time in AUC Cortisol Stress Response
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
The stress biomarker cortisol (µg/dL) assessed at rest and in response to the Trier Social Stress test (AUC with respect to ground) at baseline (Week 8) and again post-randomization at weeks 16, 20 and 24. Blood serum samples for measuring cortisol are taken at immediately before the Trier Social Stress test and at 10, 20, 30, and 45 minutes post test. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between timepoints and with 95% confidence interval limits.
Baseline (Week 8), Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Change Over Time in Threat Bias Score From Dot Probe Task
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Changes in threat bias scores assessed using Dot Probe task during labs at weeks 8, 16, 20 and 24. The bias measurement protocol consists of 144 trials (48 threat congruent, 48 threat incongruent, 48 neutral presentations). Participants indicate the probe letter via button press. Angry face location, probe location, probe type and actor are all fully counterbalanced in presentation. The threat bias score equals the mean of reaction time on threat congruent from threat incongruent trials. A threat bias scores >0 indicate a bias towards threat, whereas scores <0 mean that the participant is slower to respond to threatening stimuli than neutral stimuli. Reaction times were measured in milliseconds. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between timepoints with 95% confidence interval limits.
up to 24 weeks
Change Over Time in Percent of "Hard Task" Choice in EEfRT
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) measures approach motivation that indexes the willingness to expend effort to obtain monetary rewards under varying conditions of reward probability and magnitude. On each trial, participants choose between an "easy task" and a "hard task" and are presented with information about the probability of winning (i.e., 12%, 50%, or 88%), and the magnitude of the potential reward if they complete the button-press task successfully (range: $1.24 - $4.12). Completion of the easy task requires 30 button presses in 7 seconds using the dominant index finger, whereas completion of the hard task requires 100 presses with the non-dominant "pinky" finger in 21 seconds. The percent of hard task choices is the dependent measure. Change over time is defined as the difference in least square means between time points with 95% confidence interval limits.
up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan Girdler, PhD, Research Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-1731
  • 1R01MH108690-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will submit data to the Research Domain Criteria Database (RDoCdb) and/or the National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness (NDCT). The investigators will work with RDoCdb and NDCT staff to define data structures for any data being collected as part of the study. Descriptive data will be submitted two times per year and provide supporting documentation as necessary for others to more fully understand the manner in which data were collected. The investigators will submit cumulative data each submission cycle and will review data for any personally identifiable information and ensure that data are loaded correctly. The investigators will share data within 4 months after submission and submit experimental data within 12 months after study completion. Study data for each publication will be created and submit a link to the RDoCdb study along with any publications so readers of articles can link back to the data used in RDoCdb and NDCT.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress, Emotional

Clinical Trials on Placebo Patch

Subscribe