CLE Characteristics of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

June 5, 2018 updated by: Prof.dr. J.J.M.C.H. de la Rosette, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

A Prospective In-Vivo Human Pilot Study to Assess Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Characteristics of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Rationale: Initial evaluation usually consists of cross sectional imaging of the urinary tract. When a suspect lesion is seen, an ureterorenoscopy is planned to visualize the lesion and to collect tissue for histopathology. These techniques are considered to be the gold standard in diagnosis of UTUC. CLE, a high resolution imaging technique that can be used in combination with endo-urological procedures, seems promising to improve diagnosis of urothelial cancer. CLE image characteristics for UTUC still have to be defined.

Objective: With this IDEAL stage 2b explorative pilot study the investigators aim to assess in-vivo CLE image characteristics of normal urothelium, benign urothelium and urothelial carcinoma (low-grade, high-grade or CIS) of the upper urinary tract by qualitatively comparing CLE images with both histopathology from diagnostic biopsies and pathology from the therapeutic radical nephroureterectomy. Secondary objectives are the development of an imaging atlas and to assess the technical feasibility and procedure related adverse events of CLE.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, mono-center observational human, in vivo pilot study to assess in-vivo CLE characteristics of normal urothelium, benign urothelium and urothelial carcinoma (low-grade, high-grade or CIS) of the upper urinary tract. Eligible patients have a suspect tumour in the upper urinary tract and are scheduled for a diagnostic URS. Eligible patients will be informed about this study by their urologist. Information about the study will be provided both verbally and in written form.

CLE images are recorded using a probe-based system (Cellvizio 100 series, Mauna Kea Technologies, Paris, France). The probe has a diameter of 0,85 mm, hereby enabling passage through the working channel of ureterorenoscope. It has a depth of tissue penetration of 50 µm, a field of view of 320 µm and a resolution of 3,5 µm. Images are collected at a scan rate of 12 frames per second. Using the Cellvizio Viewer system, we can observe mucosal microarchitecture with an increased field of view through mosaic post processing. This system also enables virtual staining of mucosal structures to further enhance tissue contrast.

A fluorescent contrast agent is needed to obtain CLE images. Fluorescein (fluoresceinedinatrium, Fresenius Kabi, Zeist, Nederland), a non-toxic and commonly used fluorescent dye will be administered through the working channel of the ureterorenoscope into the pyelocaliceal system (3 - 5 mL 0.1% fluorescein diluted in saline) and left indwelling for 5 minutes to stain the extracellular matrix.

In this study patients will undergo one CLE measurement during the planned diagnostic URS. We measure on average 2 regions of interest per patient. If a patient has multiple tumours we will do multiple measurements. The measurement duration per patient adds maximally 10 minutes during the URS. At a later stage two independent non-blinded observers will review the CLE images. The CLE images of the diagnostic URS are qualitatively compared with histopathology from diagnostic biopsies, and if performed also with pathology from the therapeutic nephroureterectomy.

Based on the UTUC diagnosis from the diagnostic URS, in general about one third of the patients are indicated for a therapeutic radical nephroureterectomy. The other two thirds of the UTUC patients are treated with endoscopic treatment. If patients undergo several ureterorenoscopies, they may be approached for CLE measurements at consecutive ureterorenoscopies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105AZ
        • Academic Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with a suspect tumour in the upper urinary tract, who are planned for a diagnostic URS, are eligible for this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >18 years
  • Suspect upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
  • Scheduled for diagnostic URS
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients <18 years
  • Patients with known allergy for fluorescein
  • Possible pregnancy or lactating women
  • Patients not eligible for radical treatment of UTUC
  • No signed informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-vivo CLE measurements of normal urothelium and urothelial carcinoma (low-grade, high-grade or CIS) of the upper urinary tract
Time Frame: 3 years
The CLE measurements are qualitatively correlated to the corresponding histopathology
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean J de la Rosette, prof. dr., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urothelial Carcinoma

3
Subscribe