The Effect of Printing Layer Thickness on the Accuracy of Computer Aided Surgical Guides

January 16, 2017 updated by: Amr Mohamed Ahmed Hanafy, Cairo University

The Effect of Printing Layer Thickness on the Accuracy of Computer Aided Surgical Guides : A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of printing layer thickness on accuracy of computer aided surgical guide

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Computer aided surgical guide has many variables that affect its accuracy , in this study one variable is considered that may affect the accuracy of surgical guide which is printing of layer thickness of surgical guide whether 50 micron or 100 micron.

computer aided surgical guide is constructed by imaging the patient pre-operative cone beam CT wearing scan appliance , then virtual implant placement on special soft ware ( Blue sky Bio ) and optical scanning of patient casts , afterword superimposition of the virtual implants on the scanned casts to design the surgical guide and printing on 3D printer ( Zenith 3D printer , Dentis , Korea ) with printing layer thickness 50 micron in first group and 100 micron in second group . Fixation of surgical guide in patient mouth and drilling of implant osteotomy through the guiding sleeves , post-operative Cone Beam CT with the same apparatus and setting as pre-operative scan .

Finally, the pre-operative and post operative scans were then overlapped to measure linear and angular deviation of the virtually planned and actual implants position.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients partially or totally edentulous arches .
  • patients with Bucco-lingual bone thickness >6 mm allowing flapless implant placement
  • patients free from any systemic diseases that may affect bone quality e.g diabetes .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with thin ridges.
  • patients with systemic disease that may affect bone quality.
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene and active periodontal diseases.
  • Anatomical situations requiring regenerative procedure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 50 micron
surgical guide constructed with 3D printing with printing layer thickness 50 micron
comparing accuracy of surgical guide of printing layer thickness of 50 micron and 100 micron by superimposition of pre-operative and post-operative CBCT
Other Names:
  • surgical guide
Active Comparator: 100 micron
surgical guide constructed with 3D printing with printing layer thickness 100 micron
comparing accuracy of surgical guide of printing layer thickness of 50 micron and 100 micron by superimposition of pre-operative and post-operative CBCT
Other Names:
  • surgical guide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
accuracy of surgical guide
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mahmoud El far, phd, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBC-CU-2017-01-08

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Guided Surgery

Clinical Trials on computer aided surgical guide

Subscribe