Searching Clinical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Onset (SOON)

October 9, 2019 updated by: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

The Boundaries of Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Searching Clinical COPD Onset

The aim of this study is to determine if presence of dyspnea identifies differences in the 6-min walk test performance among smokers with normal or mild spirometric obstruction, accounting for the confounding effect of heart failure on dyspnea with stress echocardiography.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a prolonged course before onset, following classical epidemiological principles of chronic disease and genetic predisposition. "Disease onset" may be defined as a physiologic impairment expressed by an abnormal spirometric index, but "early disease" could include clinical manifestations, such as cough, phlegm, dyspnea or exercise limitation, but normal spirometry. For the present proposal, we will use dyspnea to define a symptomatic subject, since dyspnea is the most relevant symptom all over the range of the disease. Besides, we have defined "early disease" when current or ex-smoker-adults: a) complain of dyspnea but have normal spirometry; b) complain of dyspnea and have mild bronchial obstruction; and, c) have mild bronchial obstruction without dyspnea. These subtypes are roughly similar to Global initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages 0 and 1 [1], although further characterized by the presence or absence of dyspnea. The dyspnea cut off value we have chosen to separate symptomatic from asymptomatic subjects is a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥1, which is in line with several recent communications [2-4], but differs from the cut off recommended by GOLD (score ≥2) [5]. In addition, GOLD 0 stage [1], included in the GOLD guidelines of 2001 and currently not in use, did not comprise a dyspneic subtype, which is now included in light of new evidence pointing out at their potential relevance [6, 7].

Early disease subtypes

  1. Symptomatic current or ex-smokers with normal spirometry have been reported by Woodruff et al [7] on a large sample of individuals who complain of chronic respiratory symptoms, reduced exercise tolerance, and computed tomography (CT) imaging bronchiolitis. These results are in line with previous findings of another large study from Regan et al [8] where more than 50% of symptomatic smokers with normal spirometry have respiratory-related impairment and evidence of emphysema on CT imaging. Woodruff et al [7] used the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire to define symptoms [9] and found that cough, phlegm, dyspnea, activity limitation, and energy level were equally distributed among symptomatic smokers regardless of the presence of spirometric COPD. However, although CAT is intended to be specific for COPD [9], most of its domains may reflect concomitant respiratory (asthma and bronchiectasis) and/or nonrespiratory diseases (heart failure, ischemic heart disease, obesity, and depression) [10]. In contrast, Regan et al [8] measured seven "respiratory-related impairments" and found one or more to be present in 54% of patients. Three of these impairments could be considered rather specific of COPD, like CT percentage of emphysema >5% and gas trapping >20%, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score >25. However, four impairments (chronic bronchitis, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score ≥2, exacerbations and 6-min walk distance <350 m) are non-specific as they may be partly or fully explained by comorbidities like gastroesophageal reflux disease, rhinosinusitis, obesity or heart failure, among others. Actually, retrospective data suggest that patients with COPD and comorbid conditions may have greater risk for having symptoms than those without comorbidity [11, 12].
  2. Non-dyspneic current or ex-smokers with mild COPD has been also described [13, 14]. It seems that in this group coexist individuals with normal lung function and 6-min walk test performance [14] and subjects with resting lung hyperinflation, reduced diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and slightly increased cycle-exercise-induced dyspnoea [13].
  3. Dyspneic current or ex-smokers with mild COPD have significant emphysema and airway thickness, lower DLCO, exercise-induced arterial desaturation, and reduced 6-min walking distance [14, 15]. In addition, during incremental cycle-exercise they exhibit increased ventilatory demand, lung hyperinflation and greater exertional dyspnea than smoker controls [16].

Hypothesis

We hypothesize that dyspneic individuals notwithstanding of their spirometry results, should share some clinical, structural and physiologic abnormalities. In particular, we expect that the two dyspneic groups with and without mild COPD exhibit reduced exercise capacity, in addition to worse quality of life; lower physical activity; greater lung hyperinflation; greater emphysema and airway thickness; and reduced peripheral muscle mass, than their asymptomatic counterpart, i.e., non-dyspneic mild COPD and controls.

Study aim

This study intends to identify the three early COPD subtypes already defined using differences in exercise capacity as the primary outcome. As secondary outcomes, we will intend to separate these groups by means of differences in clinical (quality of life, physical activity), physiological (exercise testing) and structural characteristics (emphysema, airway disease, and peripheral muscle mass by CT imaging). Future analyses are planned to evaluate longitudinal deterioration in these clinical, physiological and structural characteristics. Potential influence of obesity and undiagnosed heart failure on dyspnea and thus, on exercise capacity, will be explored within the three subtypes.

Study design

The study has a cross sectional design aimed at obtaining representative samples of adults between 45 and 80 years. Two hundred and forty participants will be enrolled into four strata as already defined, i.e., dyspneic current or ex-smokers with and without mild COPD; and non-dyspneic current or ex-smokers with and without (controls) mild COPD. Study subjects will be recruited from the outpatient clinics and the pulmonary function labs at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile Health Network by means of physician referral, advertisement in clinical areas, or self-referral at the study center. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study protocol and signed informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

Sample size

A sample size of at least 52 subjects per group provide enough power (80%) to detect a significant difference (95% confidence level or alpha 0.05) in the 6-min walk test among symptomatic and asymptomatic participants, based on a conservative relevant difference in walking distance of 50 meters with a common standard deviation of 110 metres. Such difference was found when comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects with normal spirometry [7], but may be an underestimation in patients with mild spirometric COPD [14], where the difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was 100 metres. Forestalling a participant loss rate of 20%, 60 patients will be included in each group.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Chile
    • Region Metropolitana
      • Santiago, Region Metropolitana, Chile, 8330033
        • Respiratory Department; Hospital Clinico Universidad Catolica

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study subjects will be recruited from the outpatient clinics and the pulmonary function labs at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile Health Network by means of physician referral, advertisement in clinical areas, or self-referral at the study centre.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 45 to 80 years
  • Smoking history >10 pack-year
  • Mild COPD subjects: Male or female individuals; post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≥80% of predicted normal and post-bronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio <0.70
  • Non-COPD subjects: Male or female individuals; post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥80% of predicted normal and post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio ≥0.70

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to tolerate study procedures
  • Unable to walk or cycle without assistance
  • Dementia or cognitive disorder, which would prevent the participant from consenting the study or completing study procedures
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Locomotor disease that seriously limits exercise tolerance
  • Untreated symptomatic peripheral artery disease
  • Body Mass Index >40 kg/m2
  • Non-COPD significant pulmonary disease such as asthma; interstitial lung disease; sarcoidosis; tuberculosis; cystic fibrosis; diffuse bronchiectasis; and others
  • Primary pulmonary hypertension
  • Current lung cancer
  • Previous lung resection
  • Large thoracic metal implants that in opinion of the investigator limit CT scan analyses
  • Current use of prednisone >5 mg daily
  • Current use of immunosuppressive agent
  • Current exposure to chemotherapy or radiation treatments that, in the opinion of the investigator could limit interpretation of pulmonary function, exercise tolerance and CT scan imaging
  • Current illicit substance abuse, excluding marijuana
  • Known HIV/AIDS infection
  • Current extra thoracic cancer, which, in the opinion of their physicians, limits life expectancy to less than 3 years
  • Recent myocardial infarction (6 months or less)
  • Chronic congestive heart failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Non-dyspneic smokers/ normal spirometry
Male or female current or former smokers. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) >0.7. FVC >lower limit of normal (LLN). Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score = 0.
Dyspneic smokers/ normal spirometry
Male or female current or former smokers. FEV1/FVC >0.7. FVC >LLN. mMRC dyspnea score ≥1.
Non-dyspneic mild COPD patients
Male or female current or former smokers. FEV1/FVC ≤0.7. FEV1 >80% of predicted value. mMRC dyspnea score =0.
Dyspneic mild COPD patients
Male or female current or former smokers. FEV1/FVC ≤0.7. FEV1 >80% of predicted value. mMRC dyspnea score ≥1.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Walking distance during the six-minute walking test
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Baseline
Computed tomography emphysema
Time Frame: Baseline
Emphysema will be quantitated using the percentage of low-attenuation units less than -950 Hounsfield units (HU) using open source software (www.Slicer.org).
Baseline
Computed tomography airway thickness
Time Frame: Baseline
Single-slice airway measurements will be collected in the apical bronchus of the right upper lobe and the right lower lobe posterior basal bronchus. Measurements will be performed in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th airway generation.
Baseline
Computed tomography cross-sectional area of the right thigh muscle
Time Frame: Baseline
The cross-sectional area of the right thigh muscle will be measured at halfway between the pubic symphysis and the inferior condyle of the femur, in the surface area of the tissue with a density of 40 to 100 HU. This range of density corresponds to the density of muscle tissue.
Baseline
Lung function
Time Frame: Baseline
Spirometry, single-breath DLCO, and plethysmographic lung volume assessment will be performed
Baseline
Stress echocardiography
Time Frame: Baseline
Transthoracic stress echocardiography will be performed with a VIVID-7 echocardiography system and echo cardiac stress table, with electrical adjustable slope for an optimal position of the heart. Function in each segment of the left ventricle (LV) will be graded at rest and with stress as normal or hyperdynamic, hypokinetic, akinetic, dyskinetic, or aneurysmal. In addition to the evaluation of segmental function, the global LV response to stress be assessed. Diastolic function will be analysed at rest, and systolic function at rest and end exercise
Baseline
Physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline
A triaxial accelerometer will be used. This accelerometer measures activity counts and vector magnitude, energy expenditure, steps taken, physical activity intensity, subject position, and ambient light levels. We will retrieve, collect and study three physical activity (PA) outcomes: step count (i.e. movement); spent physical activity time per day (i.e., moderate or vigorous), and PA level (i.e., activity related energy expenditure).
Baseline
Exercise testing
Time Frame: Baseline
A symptom-limited incremental cycle exercise test will be conducted to measure the maximal workload. A constant work rate cycle endurance test will be performed afterwards.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Orlando Diaz, MD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 13-125b
  • 1141108 (Other Identifier: FONDECYT)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Copd

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Bulgaria

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe