Reducing the Rate and Duration of Re-ADMISsions Among Patients With Unipolar Disorder and Bipolar Disorder Using Smartphone-based Monitoring and Treatment - The RADMIS Trials (RADMIS)

September 28, 2022 updated by: Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Psychiatric Centre Rigshospitalet

Unipolar and bipolar disorder combined account for nearly half of all morbidity and mortality due to mental and substance use disorders, and burden society with the highest health care costs of all psychiatric and neurological disorders. Among these, costs due to psychiatric hospitalization is a major burden. Smartphones comprise an innovative and unique platform for monitoring and treatment of depression and mania.

The RADMIS trials use a randomized controlled single-blind parallel-group design. Patients with unipolar or bipolar disorder discharged from psychiatric hospitals in The Capital Region of Denmark are invited to participate. Patients are at discharge from the psychiatric hospitals randomized, separately according to psychiatric diagnosis (thus, the RADMIS trial consists of two separate trials according to diagnosis, bipolar disorder or unipolar disorder), to: 1) a smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules (intervention group) or 2) treatment-as-usual (control group) for a 6-months trial period. The trial is started in March 2017. The outcomes are 1) differences in the number and duration of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group (primary), 2) differences in severity of depressive and manic symptoms (manic symptoms only for patients with bipolar disorder); differences in psychosocial functioning; and differences in number of affective episodes between the intervention group and the control group (secondary), and 3) differences in perceived stress, quality of life, self-rated depressive symptoms, self-rated manic symptoms (only for patients with bipolar disorder), recovery, empowerment, adherence to medication, well-being, ruminations, worrying, and satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group (tertiary).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Unipolar and bipolar disorder combined account for nearly half of all morbidity and mortality due to mental and substance use disorders, and burden society with the highest health care costs of all psychiatric and neurological disorders. Among these, costs due to psychiatric hospitalization are a major burden. Smartphones comprise an innovative and unique platform for monitoring and treatment of depression and mania. No prior trial has investigated whether the use of a smartphone-based system can prevent re-admission among patients discharged from hospital.

Methods The RADMIS trials use a randomized controlled single-blind parallel-group design. Patients with unipolar disorder and patients with bipolar disorder are invited to participate in each their trial when discharged from psychiatric hospitals in The Capital Region of Denmark following an affective episode and randomized to either 1) a smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules (intervention group) or 2) standard treatment (control group) for a 6-months trial period. The trial is started in March 2017. The outcomes are 1) differences in the number and duration of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group (primary), 2) differences in severity of depressive and manic symptoms (manic symptoms only for patients with bipolar disorder); differences in psychosocial functioning; and differences in number of affective episodes between the intervention group and the control group (secondary), and 3) differences in perceived stress, quality of life, self-rated depressive symptoms, self-rated manic symptoms (only for patients with bipolar disorder), recovery, empowerment, adherence to medication, well-being, ruminations, worrying, and satisfaction between the intervention group and the control group (tertiary).

Analysis Recruitment is ongoing.

Discussion If the smartphone-based monitoring system is proved effective in reducing the rate and duration of re-admissions there will be basis for using a system of this kind in the treatment of unipolar and bipolar disorder in general and in a larger scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unipolar disorder or bipolar disorder diagnoses according to ICD-10
  • Patients who are discharged from a psychiatric hospital in The Capital Region of Denmark following an affective episode (depression or mania)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • A lack of Danish language skills

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
A smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules
A smartphone-based monitoring system including a) an integrated feedback loop between patients and clinicians and b) context-aware CBT modules
Other Names:
  • Monsenso
No Intervention: Control group
Treatment-as-usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of re-admissions
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in the number of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group. Data will be collected from Danish registers.
6 months trial period
Duration of re-admissions
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in the duration of re-admissions between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in the severity of depressive (The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) symptoms between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Severity of manic symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in the severity of manic (The Young Mania Rating Scale) symptoms between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Psychosocial functioning
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in psychosocial functioning (The Psychosocial Functioning Assessment Short Test - FAST) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Number of affective episodes
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in the number of affective episodes between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived stress
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in perceived stress (The Cohen's Perceived stress scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in quality of life (The WHO Quality of Life-BREF) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Self-rated manic symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in self-rated manic symptoms (The Altman Self Rating scale for Mania) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Self-rated depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in self-rated depressive symptoms (The Becks Depressive Inventory) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Self-rated depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in self-rated depressive symptoms (The Hamilton Depression Self-rating Scale 6-item) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Recovery
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in recovery (The Recovery Assessment Scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Empowerment
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in empowerment (Rogers empowerment scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Adherence to medication
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in adherence to medication (The Medicine Adherence Rating Scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Well-being
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in well-being according (The WHO (five) well-being index) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Rumination
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in rumination (The Rumination Response Scale) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Worrying
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in worrying (The Penn State Worry Questionnaire) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period
Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months trial period
Differences in satisfaction (The Verona Satisfaction Scale-Affective Disorder) between the intervention group and the control group.
6 months trial period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, MD, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder

3
Subscribe