Sequential Conditioning in Haploidentical Transplantation for Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SET-HAPLO)

Sequential Chemotherapy Prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning: Interventional Study in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation for Patients With Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only treatment option with a significant chance of healing in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or refractory multiple relapses after chemotherapy. However, all patients with an indication of allo-HSC can not benefit because of two limitations: the toxicity of the treatment and graft shortage available.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of an SET followed by haploidentical transplant with post-transplant immune modulation by prophylactic DLI in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia or relapsed. The main objective is to assess overall survival at 2 years in these patients.

Secondary objectives:

  1. To evaluate the efficacy of this therapeutic strategy in terms of remission of disease, incidence of relapse and relapse-free survival
  2. To evaluate the non-relapse mortality
  3. To evaluate the incidence of acute and chronic graft against host disease (GVHD)
  4. To assess the feasibility of prophylactic injections of donor lymphocytes (pDLI)
  5. To analyze the post-transplant immune reconstitution

Secondary endpoints:

  1. partial or complete remission rate by standard criteria at 90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation.

    Relapse incidence and death related to the disease 90 days 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation Leukemia-free survival at 1 year and 2 years after transplantation

  2. Cumulative incidence of death not related to relapse at 90 days, 1 year and 2 years after transplantation
  3. Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft against host disease (GVHD)
  4. Number of patients for whom pDLI was possible and number of pDLI / patient; incidence, severity and treatment of possible secondary GVHD in these patients
  5. Study of immune reconstitution post-transplant in the peripheral blood 30, 90 and 180 days after transplantation (CD4 lymphocyte levels, CD8, T regulators, Natural Killer cells and B cells)

Methodology, experimental design:

Multicenter study in routine care, prospective

All patients will receive, as part of the marketing authorization of the products used, the following regimen:

1- sequential Packaging (SET):

  1. sequential chemotherapy:

    • Thiotepa 5 mg / kg / day for 1 day (D-13)
    • Cyclophosphamide 400 mg / m² / day for 4 days (J-12 to J-9)
    • Etoposide 100 mg / m² / day for 4 days (J-12 to J-9)
  2. Rest days J-8 and J-6
  3. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC)

    • Fludarabine 30 mg / m² / day for 5 days (J-5 to D-1)
    • Busulfan IV 3.2 mg / kg / day for 2 days (J-5 and J-4)
    • Anti-lymphocyte serum (Thymoglobuline) 2.5 mg / kg / day for 2 days (J-3 and J-2)

      2 Graft transfusion: the day D0. A graft of peripheral stem cells is preferred.

      3- Prevention of GVHD:

    • Cyclophosphamide 50mg / kg / day on days D + 3 and D + 5
    • Cyclosporine A (CSA; 3 mg / kg / day IV from D + 6)
    • Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 30 mg / kg / day, maximum x2 1g / day from day J + 6)

      4- Care supports: according to the protocols of each center

      5- lymphocyte injection of prophylactic donor (pDLI): according to the protocols of each center. The following scheme is proposed:

    • In the absence of clinical contraindication(GVHD), tapering MMF between days D + 35 and D + 56, then tapering CSA between D + 62 and D + 90
    • pDLI: 3 injections from the D + 120 in patients who discontinued immunosuppressive therapy for ≥ 1 month and having no active GVHD or history of acute GVHD grade> II.

      6. Feedback: at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after transplant (engraftment, disease response, immune reconstitution, chimerism, GVHD, infection, quality of life).

The treatments evaluated in this strategy are all used in the usual care of patients and follow-up will not be changed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Service d'hématologie clinique Hôpital Saint Antoine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia after primary induction treatment failure (persistent leukemia after 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy)
  • Patient age ≥ 18 to <60 years
  • Cardiac ejection fraction of the left ventricle ≥ 45%
  • Lung function - free diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide ≥ 50% of predicted value
  • Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml / min depending on the CKD-EPI formula
  • Availability of an HLA haploidentical donor in the family
  • Collection of non-opposition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled invasion of CNS
  • Availability of an HLA identical family donor who agreed to donate hematopoietic stem cells OR non-related donor HLA-compatible 10/10 on HLA-A alleles, B, C, and DRB1 DQB1 available and ready to give in 4 weeks to make a decision allograft
  • Presence in the patient HLA-specific antibodies directed against an antigen HLA haploidentical donor family
  • Karnofsky score <70%
  • Patient HIV positive
  • Hepatitis B or C or chronic active
  • Uncontrolled infection at the time of start packing
  • Contraindication to the use of treatments provided by the Protocol
  • Previous history of allo-HSC
  • No beneficiary of a social security scheme.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Patients with primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia
According to the protocols of each center

Sequential chemotherapy:

  • Thiotepa 5 mg / kg / day for 1 day (D-13)
  • Cyclophosphamide 400 mg / m² / day for 4 days (J-12 to J-9)
  • Etoposide 100 mg / m² / day for 4 days (J-12 to J-9) Repos days J-8 and J-6 Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC)
  • Fludarabine 30 mg / m² / day for 5 days (J-5 to D-1)
  • Busulfan IV 3.2 mg / kg / day for 2 days (J-5 and J-4)
  • Anti-lymphocyte serum (Thymoglobuline) 2.5 mg / kg / day for 2 days (J-3 and J-2)
Graft of peripheral stem cells is preferred at D0
  • Cyclophosphamide 50mg / kg / day on days D + 3 and D + 5
  • Cyclosporine A (CSA; 3 mg / kg / day IV from D + 6)
  • Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 30 mg / kg / day, maximum x2 1g / day from day J + 6)

According to the protocols of each center. In the absence of clinical indication against-disease (GVHD), phasing MMF between days D + 35 and D + 56, then phasing APF between D + 62 and D + 90

- PDLI: 3 injections from the D + 120 patients who discontinued immunosuppressive therapy for ≥ 1 month and having no active GVHD or history of acute GVHD grade> II

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 2 years after transplantation

The aim is to describe the efficacy of the combination of a SET followed by haploidentical transplant with post-transplant immune modulation by pDLI in patients with AML.

The main objective is to assess overall survival at 2 years in these patients.

2 years after transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Partial or complete remission rate by standard criteria Relapse incidence and death related to the disease
Time Frame: 90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation
To evaluate the efficacy of this therapeutic strategy in terms of remission of disease, incidence of relapse
90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of death not related to relapse
Time Frame: 90 days and then 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Assess not related to relapse mortality
90 days and then 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft against host disease (GVHD)
Time Frame: 100 days and then 12 and 24 months after transplantation
To evaluate the incidence of acute and chronic graft against host disease (GVHD)
100 days and then 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Number of patients for whom pDLI was possible.
Time Frame: 2 years after transplantation
Assess the feasibility of prophylactic injections of donor lymphocytes (pDLI)
2 years after transplantation
Study of immune reconstitution post-transplant in the peripheral blood will be used:CD4 lymphocyte levels, CD8, T regulators, Natural Killer cells and B cells
Time Frame: 90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Study the post-transplant immune reconstitution
90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Leukemia free survival
Time Frame: 90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Relapse-free survival
90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Number of pDLI / patient; incidence, severity and treatment of possible secondary GVHD in these patients
Time Frame: 90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation
Assess the feasibility of prophylactic injections of donor lymphocytes (pDLI)
90 days and then 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Care supports

Subscribe