Oral and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Lumbar Spine Surgery

February 15, 2024 updated by: Charles S Day, Henry Ford Health System

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Lumbar Spine Surgery

The purpose of this project is to compare the effectiveness of two different but well accepted routes of administration of tranexamic acid in order to reduce blood loss and need for transfusion in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Specifically, this study seeks to identify if intravenous tranexamic acid is superior to oral tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and need for transfusion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Spine surgery is associated with large amount of perioperative blood loss. Factors influencing blood loss include surgical technique, operative time, number of vertebral levels arthrodesed, and others. Significant blood loss is associated with complications such as hypotension, end organ damage, or coagulopathy. Blood transfusions can increase risks of infection, blood incompatibility, and allergic reactions. Due to the significant risks and complications associated with blood loss and allogenic transfusions, efforts to identify safe and effective ways of lowering blood loss during spine surgery are crucial. Many methods have been utilized to reduce allogenic blood transfusions, such as autologous blood predonation, antifibrinolytic drugs, acute normovolemic hemodilution, intraoperative blood salvage, and others. Furthermore, the administration of antifibrinolytics, such as tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), has been shown to reduce bleeding in cardiac, gynecological, urologic and total joint replacement surgeries. There have been many published studies investigating various antifibrinolytic agents such as TXA, EACA, and aprotinin. While aprotinin was shown to increase mortality rate in patients following cardiac surgery, TXA and EACA have not been shown to cause any substantial morbidity or to increase rate of thromboembolic events. Although IV TXA has been shown to be effective in reducing blood loss and transfusions in patients undergoing spine surgery, no studies in the literature have investigated the efficacy of PO TXA in decreasing blood loss and transfusions. The investigators believe that PO TXA will be just as efficacious and more cost-effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion needs in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

The ultimate goal is identifying the most cost-effective protocol to decrease blood loss and need for transfusion. If oral TXA is found to be as efficacious as IV TXA in reducing blood loss and need for transfusion, significant cost savings can be achieved for the patient and the health care system in general.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Charles C Yu, MD
  • Phone Number: 314-614-3536
  • Email: cyu1@hfhs.org

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients over age 18 and scheduled for open lumbar spine surgery (primary or revision)
  • Must be able to swallow tablets

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known allergy to TXA
  • History of renal failure or kidney transplant
  • History of arterial thromboembolic event (eg. myocardial infarction, stroke) within the past year
  • Placement of an arterial stent within the past year
  • History of blood clots (DVT, PE) within the past year
  • Refusal to receive blood products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intravenous Tranexamic Acid
The IV TXA group will receive the standard dosing for our institution of 1 g TXA (diluted in 100 mL normal saline) given as an IV bolus immediately before incision and another 1 g TXA given before closure.
To identify if intravenous tranexamic acid is superior to oral tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and need for transfusion in lumbar spine surgery.
Other Names:
  • Lysteda
Active Comparator: Oral Tranexamic Acid
The oral TXA group will receive 1950 mg TXA (3 tablets of 650 mg) approximately 2 hours before incision.
To identify if intravenous tranexamic acid is superior to oral tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and need for transfusion in lumbar spine surgery.
Other Names:
  • Lysteda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-operative blood loss between the two groups
Time Frame: Day of surgery to 1 day after surgery, up to 7 days
For males: BV = 0.3669*(Height in meters)^3 + 0.03219*(Weight in kilograms) + 0.6041 For females: BV = 0.3561*(Height in meters)^3 + 0.03308*(Weight in kilograms) + 0.1833 Hbloss = BV*(Hbi-Hbe )*0.001 + Hbt Blood loss = 1000*(Hbloss/Hbi) Hbloss = Hemoglobin loss; BV = Blood Volume; Hbi = initial Hgb; Hbe = ending Hgb; Hbt = transfused Hgb = about 52g (SD 5.4g) per 1u pRBC (320mL)
Day of surgery to 1 day after surgery, up to 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Post-operative drop in hemoglobin between the two groups
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
Post-operative blood loss between the two groups
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
Number of units transfused between the two groups
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
Post-operative drain output between the two groups
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
1 day after surgery until patient is discharged, up to 7 days
Incidence of thromboembolic events between the two groups
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery until patient returns for first postoperative visit (through study completion, an average of 4 weeks after surgery)
1 day after surgery until patient returns for first postoperative visit (through study completion, an average of 4 weeks after surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

January 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Loss, Surgical

Clinical Trials on Tranexamic Acid

3
Subscribe