Diagnostic Value of DECT Scan Compared to Diagnostic Needle Aspiration (DEteCT)

March 17, 2019 updated by: Mihaela Gamala, Meander Medical Center

Rationale: Gout is a disease with growing incidence and complexity due to increased life expectancy, co-morbidity and medication. The disease can be diagnosed by microscopy, demonstrating monosodium uric acid (MSU) in synovial fluid of the affected joint or in tophi (subcutaneous or peritendinous MSU depositions). In daily practice, however, the diagnosis is difficult to ascertain due to sampling error (no synovial fluid acquired because the needle was not exactly placed in the affected joint, or the location of the gout might have been extra-articular e.g. around tendons) or to a different cause of acute arthritis (e.g. infection, reactive arthritis). Recently, Dual Energy CT scan has become available. This technique allows the visualization and quantification of MSU. Although imaging modalities such as DECT show promise in the classification of gout, the studies to date have been small and have primarily involved people with established disease.

A study with cross-sectional design in which patients for whom the clinical questions "does this patient have gout?" are referred for participation may contribute to assess the value of DECT scan in diagnosing acute arthritis caused by gout.

Objective: Assessment of value of DECT scan in diagnosing acute arthritis, caused by gout.

Study design: Prospective Study population: Patients with acute mono or oligo arthritis without prior diagnosis, the rheumatologist has an indication for diagnostic needle aspiration.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In current daily practice, patients with acute mono- or oligo-arthritis without prior diagnosis undergo a diagnostic aspiration of the affected joint. This can be done by blind aspiration or ultra sound guided aspiration depending on the judgement of the rheumatologist. The aspirated synovial fluid is then assessed by polarized microscopy to detect MSU crystals. The diagnostic value of DECT in acute gout attacks had not yet been established and is therefore not used in daily practice. In this study all patients undergo DECT scan to assess the value of DECT scan in diagnosing acute arthritis caused by gout. If the DECT scan demonstrates MSU depositions and the diagnosis of gout was not ascertained prior to DECT scanning by MSU crystals in the synovial fluid, then additional ultrasound guided aspiration will take place, with knowledge of DECT results, followed by repeat microscopy

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utrecht
      • Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Meander Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ruth Klaasen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mihaela Gamala, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Mono or oligo arthritis (2-3 swollen joints)
  • Indication for diagnostic aspiration of an inflamed joint in which gout is one of the possibilities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Polyarthritis ( up to 4 swollen joint);
  • Chrystal proven gout in history
  • Patient is on uric acid lowering therapy (Allopurinol, Benzbromaron, Febuxostat)
  • Hip arthritis*
  • Metal or prosthesis of the inflamed joint
  • Highly suspicion of infectious arthritis
  • Pregnancy
  • Contra indication of joint aspiration (skin infection, hemophilia)
  • No informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Dual Energy CT
In this study all patients undergo DECT scan to assess the value of DECT scan in diagnosing acute arthritis caused by gout. If the DECT scan demonstrates MSU depositions and the diagnosis of gout was not ascertained prior to DECT scanning by MSU crystals in the synovial fluid, then additional ultrasound guided aspiration will take place, with knowledge of DECT results, followed by repeat microscopy
In this study all patients undergo DECT scan to assess the value of DECT scan in diagnosing acute arthritis caused by gout. If the DECT scan demonstrates MSU depositions and the diagnosis of gout was not ascertained prior to DECT scanning by MSU crystals in the synovial fluid, then additional ultrasound guided aspiration will take place, with knowledge of DECT results, followed by repeat microscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of DECT scanning for the detection of MSU deposits
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical and laboratory predicators of positive DECT scan in patients with acute mono or oligo arthritis
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
number of participants, in whom the first aspirate demonstrated no MSU and/or no synovial fluid, with MSU demonstrated after ultrasound guided joint aspiration
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
number of participants with positive DECT lesions, in whom the first aspirate(s) demonstrated no MSU and/or no synovial fluid with MSU demonstrated after ultrasound guided joint aspiration at the place of positive DECT lesion
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
cost of the gout diagnostic strategies (blind joint aspiration, ultrasound guided joint aspiration, DECT) will be calculated
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Patient satisfaction: What does the patient experience as the most patient-friendly way of diagnosing gout: DECT scan, ultrasound-guided joint aspiration or blind aspiration?
Time Frame: 2 weeks
VAS DECT, blind joint aspiration, ultrasound guided joint aspiration
2 weeks
correlation between cardiovascular risk and the urate volume on DECT
Time Frame: 2 weeks
correlation coefficient between cardiovascular risk (SCORE European and ACC/AHA) and the urate volume on DECT
2 weeks
number of patients with clinical diagnosis gout 6 and 12 month after het DECT
Time Frame: 6 and 12 month
6 and 12 month
number of patients on urate lowering medication 6 and 12 month after the DECT
Time Frame: 6 and 12 month
6 and 12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ruth Klaasen, MD, PhD, Meander Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL54454.100.15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gout

Clinical Trials on Dual Energy CT

Subscribe