Corneal Collagen Crosslinking to Increase the Resistance of the Support Graft of the KPro Type I Against Corneal Melting (CXL-KPro)

Corneal Collagen Crosslinking to Increase the Resistance of the Graft Used as a Support for the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I Against Corneal Melting

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A in aim to increase the resistance of the graft used as a support for the Boston keratoprosthesis (KPro) type I against corneal melting (keratolysis or sterile necrosis).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) is an artificial cornea that restores the clarity of the visual axis. It is indicated in patients for whom conventional corneal transplantation offers a very low probability of success. Several innovations have led to improved outcomes following implantation of a KPro. However, retention of the KPro varies between 83 and 100% in the most recent series. The extrusion of the KPro is usually caused by the melting of the corneal tissue (keratolysis or sterile necrosis) used as a support.

This corneal melting is mediated by enzymes from the class of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP). Several different types of insults may lead to an excess of these enzymes. Chronic inflammation of the ocular surface is undoubtedly the best recognized risk factor. Indeed, autoimmune diseases such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Lyell syndrome (toxic epidermal necrolysis, TENS) and mucous membrane pemphigoid, has the highest rate of corneal melting post KPro. Moreover, the development of a retroprosthetic membrane has recently been recognized as a risk factor for melting. Furthermore, the dryness of the corneal epithelium, due to insufficient tear production or an alteration of the blink reflex of the eye, can also lead to an overexpression of MMP. Finally, infectious keratitis can lead to significant thinning of the corneal tissue, even once the infectious process is resolved.

Corneal collagen cross-linking is a technique approved by Health Canada for strengthening the biomechanical properties of the cornea. The crosslinked corneas become more resistant to collagenase and other MMP. The use of a crosslinked corneal graft as a support for the KPro is an interesting approach to the prevention of corneal melting.

A prospective, randomized, controlled and double-blind study will be conducted with patients receiving a Kpro at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal. Forty patients will be randomized into two groups, half will receive KPro in a crosslinked graft-support, while the other half will receive a usual graft-support. Patients will be met by their surgeon to discuss the risks, benefits of the KPro type I and alternatives treatments. Patients accepting KPro surgery, will be informed of the nature and course of the study and will be offered to participate in the study. The Eye bank of Canada will manage the randomization and maintain the codes identifying the crosslinked corneas from the untreated corneas, keeping both the surgeon and the patient blinded. Randomization will be done through a free application (http://www.randomizer.org/form.htm). A series of 10 numbers will be generated. Even numbers indicate crosslinked corneas and odd numbers indicate non-crosslinked corneas. The order of the digits will increase as for each subject is enrolled in the study. The procedure for corneal collagen crosslinking will be performed at the Eye Bank of Canada in a similar procedure to the treatment for keratoconus. Under sterile conditions, the corneo-scleral button will be inspected to meet the standard of care. If the patient is randomized to the crosslinked group, then the cornea will be treated with crosslinking as described further. If the patient is randomized the control group, the cornea will not be treated with crosslink but will be deepithelialized and soaked with riboflavin drops as described further.

The surgeon will receive the graft and operate according to the standard procedure. The KPro surgery and postoperative care will be performed in the standard way and thus will be the same for both study groups. Postoperative follow will be held at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months and will continue subsequently every 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon. These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination. In particular, the presence of corneal melting, leakage of aqueous humor, corneal infection and extrusion will be noted. Meanwhile, an imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed at least once during the first three months postoperative. This imaging will be repeated at 1, 2 and 5 years.

The prevalence of various complications (melting, leak, infection, extrusion) will be compared between the two groups with the Fischer exact test. Also, the time between surgery and the occurrence of complications will be compared using the Student t test. Finally, survival analysis of Kaplan-Meier will be performed for 1) the occurrence of corneal melting and 2) maintaining a visual acuity greater than 20/200.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X3E4
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Candidate for KPro type I
  • Capacity to give written consent
  • Ability to be followed for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another interventional study
  • Failure to wear a therapeutic contact lens due to abnormalities of the eyelids.
  • Inability to give written consent

Contraindications to the KPro type I:

  • Severe dryness with keratinization of the ocular surface
  • Intraocular tumor
  • Terminal glaucoma
  • Inoperable retinal detachment
  • Phthisis bulbi

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Kpro with crosslinked graft-support
Patient will receive a crosslinked corneal graft-support for the KPro type I. Under sterile conditions, the corneo-scleral button will be inspected, then placed on an artificial anterior chamber. The epithelium of the donor will be removed mechanically. Then one drop of riboflavin 0.1%/dextran 20% will be applied to 3 minutes on the de-epithelialized cornea for 15 minutes. Then, the source of ultraviolet A (UVA) will be irradiating the cornea for 30 minutes with a wavelength of 370 nanometer(nm) length with 5.4 joules(J)/ square centimeter (cm2) and 3 milliwatts(mW)/cm2. Meanwhile, the instillation of a drop of 0.1% riboflavin/dextran 20% continues every 5 minutes. Goggles against UVA are mandatory. The crosslinked graft-support will be forwarded to the surgeon according to standard procedure.
Corneal graft support for the KPro will be crosslinked and used with the standard surgical technique
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: KPro with normal graft-support
Patient wil receive a normal graft-support for the KPro type I. Under sterile conditions, the corneo-scleral button will be inspected, then placed on an artificial anterior chamber. The epithelium of the donor will be removed mechanically. Then, one drop of riboflavin 0.1% / dextran 20% will be applied to 30 secondes for 5 minutes on the de-epithelialized cornea.The minimally manipulated normal graft-support will be forwarded to the surgeon according to standard procedure.
Corneal graft-support will be de-epithelialized and soaked with riboflavin and then used with the standard surgical technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 1 day
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 day
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 1 week
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 week
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
2 weeks
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 1 month
This visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 month
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 1 month
An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.
1 month
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 3 months
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
3 months
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: Every 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years
These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
Every 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 1 year
An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.
1 year
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 2 years
An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.
2 years
Examine whether the use of crosslinked cornea decreases the rate of corneal melting post-Kpro when compared to using a standard corneal button
Time Frame: 5 years
An imaging allowing quantification of the thickness of the cornea graft-support (optical coherence tomography anterior segment) will be performed.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups
Time Frame: 1 day
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 day
Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups
Time Frame: 1 week
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 week
Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
2 weeks
Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups
Time Frame: 1 month
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 month
Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups
Time Frame: 3 months
This visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
3 months
Comparison of the rates of infectious keratitis between the groups
Time Frame: Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years
These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years
Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups
Time Frame: 1 day
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 day
Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups
Time Frame: 1 week
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 week
Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
2 weeks
Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups
Time Frame: 1 month
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 month
Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups
Time Frame: 3 months
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
3 months
Comparison of the rates of extrusion of the KPro between the groups
Time Frame: Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years
These visits will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years
Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups
Time Frame: 1 day
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 day
Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups
Time Frame: 1 week
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 week
Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
2 weeks
Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups
Time Frame: 1 month
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
1 month
Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups
Time Frame: 3 months
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
3 months
Comparison of the visual acuity between the groups
Time Frame: Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years
This visit will include measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure and a full slit-lamp examination.
Every to 2-4 months depending on the judgment of the surgeon for at least 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 4, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Corneal Melting in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I

Clinical Trials on Crosslinking with riboflavin of the corneal graft-support

3
Subscribe