Riboflavin at 4ºC for the Management of Pain After Crosslinking for Keratoconus Patients

Background: The objective of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is to increase the binding of intrafibrillary and interfibrillary covalent bonds to improve the mechanical stability of the cornea and thus to stop the progression of corneal ectasias. Although the vast majority of studies have described pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), the pathophysiological principle of pain is similar in CXL. From the anatomical point of view, the corneal epithelium is the most densely innervated and sensitive surface of the body, being 300-600 times greater than in the skin. The pain after CXL comes from several routes, the process begins with the epithelial rupture that generates exposure of the nerve endings, induces apoptosis and necrosis of the epithelial cells. Subsequently an inflammatory cascade is initiated in which the different cytokines stimulate the nerve terminals. Inflammatory mediators also activate the ion channels in the nerve membrane, and this process continues until the epithelium heals. Additionally, exposure to UVA rays can also cause nerve damage. The effect of local cold for pain management has already been reported in PRK. By cooling the cornea, the release of chemical mediators and inflammation can be reduced. In the CXL radiation is transformed into several forms of energy: fluorescent radiation, chemical energy and, to a small extent, heat. The CXL process is energetically comparable to photosynthesis, in which the radiation energy is transformed into chemical energy (glucose) with the help of pigments (chlorophyll). The thermal effect is negligible in the photochemical method of CXL. Justification: No method for the control of pain after crosslinking is considered ideal or universally accepted, the importance of this study lies in looking for an additional tool to reduce the most common postoperative complaint in a highly performed procedure worldwide. Hypothesis: The application of riboflavin at 4oC reduces the pain assessment after the CXL. Purpose: to evaluate the effect of the application of riboflavin at 4oC in the assessment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing CXL. Materials and methods: Prospective and interventional clinical study in patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of keratoconus who underwent CXL, in the cornea and refractive surgery service of the Ophthalmology institute Fundación Conde de Valenciana.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Enrique Graue Hernandez, MD, MSc
  • Phone Number: 3710 +52154421700
  • Email: egraueh@gmail.com

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 06800
        • Recruiting
        • INSTITUTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA CONDE DE VALENCIANA
        • Contact:
          • Enrique Graue Hernandez, MD MSc
          • Phone Number: 3710 +52 5554421700
          • Email: egraueh@gmail.com
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients of any gender
  • older than 18 years
  • diagnosis of keratoconus who require management with crosslinking in both eyes for evidence of progression.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • crosslinking without removal of epithelium or unilateral crosslinking.
  • patients with other ocular conditions different from keratoconus.
  • cognitive disability that limits the compression of the pain test as Down syndrome, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Riboflavin at 4ºC
patients treated with Riboflavin at 4ºC in crosslinking (cases).
Crosslinking in patients with progressive keratoconus.
Other Names:
  • No Cold riboflavin (Riboflavin at room temperature)
  • Cold riboflavin (Riboflavin at 4ºC)
Experimental: Riboflavin at room temperature
patients treated with Riboflavin at room temperature in crosslinking (controls)
Crosslinking in patients with progressive keratoconus.
Other Names:
  • No Cold riboflavin (Riboflavin at room temperature)
  • Cold riboflavin (Riboflavin at 4ºC)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change pain perception in patients undergoing crosslinking with riboflavin at 4ºC
Time Frame: 2 postoperative hours and from day 1 to 5 postoperative.
A previously validated numerical pain scale questionnaire was applied. Patients are asked to indicate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 10, explaining that 0 does not represent pain at all and 10 is a severe and disabling pain.
2 postoperative hours and from day 1 to 5 postoperative.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratoconus

Clinical Trials on corneal collagen crosslinking

3
Subscribe