A Histomorphometric Analysis Following Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Bone Graft Materials.

April 25, 2024 updated by: Jaime Lozada, Loma Linda University

A Histomorphometric Analysis of New Bone Formation Following Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Bone Graft Materials. A Pilot Study in Humans.

The purpose of this investigator-initiated study is to compare new bone formation through histomorphometric analysis following maxillary sinus augmentation using two different bone graft materials. A total of twenty, sinus augmentation via a lateral approach will be performed for subjects requiring sinus augmentation for implant placement and randomly divided into 2 groups. These subjects will receive one of two different bone graft materials: 1) Anorganic bovine bone matrix- InterOss (Group A), 2) Anorganic bovine bone matrix- Bio-oss (Group B). At the time of implant placement (eight months after the sinus augmentation procedure), two bone biopsies will be collected from augmented site for the histomorphometric analysis. The percentage of vital bone will be measured and analyzed statistically, also the following will be measured: percentage of non-vital bone, percentage of non-bone material , and the percentage of connective tissue.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Bovine xenograft has been established as a gold standard in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. This study was initiated to compare two different types of bovine xenografts following maxillary sinus floor augmentation. The comparison will performed using histomorphometric analysis of bone cores removed from the grafted sites. The patients that meet the guidelines for maxillary sinus floor augmentation via lateral window approach are randomly assigned into control and test groups. The surgery is performed by the same surgeon under the same protocols. The subjects in Group A - test group receive InterOss bone graft and subjects in Group B- Control Group receive BioOss bone graft. After eight months of healing at the sites, the patients are subjected to CBCT evaluation in preparation for implant placement. At the time of implant placement the two bone cores are collected from each grafted site using trephine burs. One bone core is collected from the crestal bone that will be site of implant placement and the second bone core is collected from the lateral window area not to interfere with the implant site. These bone cores are stored intact inside the trephine burs, fixed, stored and transported to the lab for histomorphometric analysis. The following parameters are measured and reported after the histomorphometric analysis.

percentage of vital bone percentage of non-vital bone ( graft material) percentage of non-bone material percentage of connective tissue.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92350
        • Loma Linda University School of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 103 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Over 18 years old who are able to read and sign an informed consent form.
  2. Patient who has good oral hygiene (Full-mouth plaque score <25%).
  3. Subject would be available for study monitoring and follow-up visits.
  4. Patients with missing teeth in the maxillary posterior region who will require sinus augmentation for implant placement. The patients may be partially or completely edentulous.
  5. Patient is a candidate for delayed implant placement approximately 8 months following sinus grafting

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Alcohol, drug dependency.
  2. Signs or symptoms of chronic maxillary sinus disease.
  3. Current smoker.
  4. History of head and neck radiation treatment.
  5. Poor health, conditions like uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension or other uncontrolled systemic disease.
  6. Physical or psychological reason that might affect the surgical procedure or the subsequent prosthodontic treatment and/or required follow-up examinations.
  7. Also, subjects who are nursing or pregnant will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: InterOss
Maxillary sinus augmentation using ABBM Inteross ( Xenograft)
Anorganic bovine bone mineral - Xenograft
Active Comparator: Bio-oss
Maxillary sinus augmentation using ABBM Bio-oss ( Xenograft)
Anorganic bovine bone mineral ( Xenograft)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of New Vital Bone.
Time Frame: 8 months post operative after the initial sinus augmentation surgery.
Vital bone as seen in histology from the collected bone cores.
8 months post operative after the initial sinus augmentation surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Percentage of Bone Marrow and Fibrous Tissue
Time Frame: Eight months post-op sinus augmentation
Cumulative percentage of Bone marrow and fibrous tissue as seen in histology.
Eight months post-op sinus augmentation
Space
Time Frame: 8 months
Space seen the histology specimen not filled with either bone or fibrous tissue in the bone core specimens.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jaime Lozada, Loma Linda University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Missing Teeth

Clinical Trials on InterOss

Subscribe