Hanover Humerus Registry (HHR)

February 21, 2017 updated by: Hannover Medical School

Prospective Register Study of Patients After Proximal Humerus and Humerus Shaft Fracture for Data Collection of Healing Process, Quality of Life and Shoulder Function According to the Treatment Method - Hanover Humerus Register (HHR)

This register study collects data of patients with proximal humerus and humerus shaft fractures to monitor the healing process by assessing shoulder function and quality of life according to the treatment method (operative or conservative management).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This prospective data collection of patients with proximal humerus and humerus shaft fractures in a lifelong aftercare treatment plan is for analyzing the healing process in one patient and compared in the whole cohort.

According to actual scientific and clinical issues can this data collection be a basis in optimizing the treatment method.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Lower Saxony
      • Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Hanover medical school /trauma surgery
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with proximal humerus fracture

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with trauma-related proximal humerus and humerus shaft fracture
  • cognitively able to fill out a questionaire
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with oncological-related proximal humerus and humerus shaft fracture
  • cognitively not able to fill out a questionaire
  • no informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant Shoulder Score (CS) (change over time)
Time Frame: following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year

The CS is a commonly used outcome measure for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of shoulder disorders including the pain score, functional assessment, range of motion and strength measures.

In week 6, 52 and in the yearly follow ups for comparison reasons the investigators also assess the CS of the not affected shoulder. Reported value is the impaired shoulder-functionality in percent. 100% are equivalent to an unimpaired shoulder function.

following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
DASH (change over time)
Time Frame: following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1,3,6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system was developed to assess the level of disability for any patient with any condition affecting the upper limb by covering domains including symptoms, physical function, social function and psychological function.
following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1,3,6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
Health related quality of life: EuroQoL (EQ-5D-3L+5L) (change over time)
Time Frame: following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1,3,6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
The EQ-5D-3L/5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It was designed for self-completion covering mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Furthermore, health state is indicated by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). EQ-5D assesses the health status of the patients in an one-dimensional number (1-3/1-5).
following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1,3,6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) (change over time)
Time Frame: following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1,3,6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
The SSV is defined as a patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100%.
following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1,3,6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
healing process (change over time)
Time Frame: following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1, 3, 6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
Analyzing the radiological imaging for possible dislocation of fracture fragments or other complications
following a aftercare treatment plan with follow ups after 1, 3, 6,12, 24, 52 weeks in the first year; then through study completion, an average of 1 year
general health conditions
Time Frame: Baseline week 1
Prior disorders of the affected shoulder and secondary diagnosis which are relevant for healing process of the proximal humerus fracture.
Baseline week 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Krettek, Prof. Doc., Hanover medical school trauma surgery// trauma foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proximal Humerus Fracture

Subscribe