Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP) Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP)

January 31, 2021 updated by: Boston University

Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP) Versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP): a Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refers to the proliferation of smooth muscle and epithelial cells of the prostate gland. The enlarged gland has the potential to result in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to either bladder outlet obstruction or increased muscle tone and resistance, or both.

For decades transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic BPH that is refractory to nonoperative management. This is a surgical intervention aimed to reduce the size of the prostate gland. However, over the past fifteen years, many alternative therapies have been introduced including laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). LEP has numerous advantages including decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay as well as increased effectiveness and safety for large prostate gland sizes (>80g).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of TURP to LEP using the ProTouch laser technology. While TURP has historically been the gold standard, LEP has become more widespread and is arguably a safer and more effective therapy for the patient. TURP is still widely performed because it is a traditional therapy with decades of data to support its efficacy, despite higher volume of blood loss and risk for TUR syndrome. In comparison, there is some data demonstrating that Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate can have similar efficacy but may have longer operative times. The ProTouch laser is comparable to the Holmium laser but additionally provides improved hemostasis and tissue vaporization. There is little to no data comparing LEP with the ProTouch laser to TURP. This study will directly compare the efficacy of these two treatment methods by enrolling eligible subjects and comparing outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Age > 50-80 years
  • Prostate gland size 50-100g
  • Failure of nonoperative therapy
  • IPSS 8+
  • FR <15ml/s
  • PVR <250
  • If PVR is 250-400 then pre-operative urodynamics will be indicated
  • Language: English, Spanish, Haitian Creole, French, Portuguese
  • Willing to randomize

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurogenic bladder
  • PVR >400ml
  • IPSS <8
  • FR >15ml/Indwelling catheter

    - History of prostate cancer

  • History of urethral stricture or vesicourethral anastomotic stricture
  • Unable to be placed in lithotomy position
  • Unable to undergo general or spinal anesthesia
  • Unable to consent
  • Untreated or uncorrected coagulopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ProTouch Laser Enucleation of Prostate
The intervention for this group is that the patient will undergo endoscopic ProTouch Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP).The laser is used to enucleate large pieces of prostatic tissue which is followed by further ablation of the tissue so that no fragments are left in the bladder
Laser enucleation of the prostate is a standard form of treatment for BPH used widely. The ProTouch laser is established to be safe and is newer than the holmium laser.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Transurethral Resection of Prostate
The intervention for this group that the patient will undergo endoscopic Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) using bipolar cautery. The prostate is essentially shaved down using sequential cuts and cautery.
TURP has been considered a gold standard for treatment of BPH in which rigid resectoscopes with bipolar cautery are used to endoscopically resect prostatic tissue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Urinary Flow Rate
Time Frame: From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months
Velocity (in cc/sec) of the urine flow
From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life score
Time Frame: From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months
Survey to determine how satisfied the patient is with urination
From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months
Blood loss
Time Frame: During surgery (full length of operative time)
Amount of blood loss during surgery.
During surgery (full length of operative time)
Catheter time
Time Frame: From time of surgery to up to 3 weeks after surgery.
the amount of time a catheter must stay in place postoperatively
From time of surgery to up to 3 weeks after surgery.
Post void residual
Time Frame: From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months
Amount of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding
From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months
Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM)
Time Frame: From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months
Survey to assess baseline sexual function and whether this is affected by intervention type
From time of randomization and ultimately at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shaun Wason, MD, Boston University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 23, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Clinical Trials on ProTouch Laser Enucleation of Prostate (LEP)

3
Subscribe