ECPR for Refractory Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (EROCA)

May 10, 2021 updated by: Robert Neumar, University of Michigan

Extracorporeal CPR for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (EROCA)

In the U.S. alone, over 300,000 people per year have sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and less than 1 out of 10 survive. The current standard practice for treating OHCA is to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) at the scene until either the heart is restarted or resuscitation efforts are considered hopeless and discontinued. An alternative strategy for those with refractory OHCA is expedited transport with ongoing mechanical CPR to an Emergency Department capable of performing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). The purpose of study is to test if this strategy is feasible and beneficial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a life-threatening condition in which the heart suddenly stops beating and there is no blood flow to the body. If cardiac arrest is not treated immediately, it causes sudden death. In the U.S. alone, over 300,000 people per year have OHCA, and less than 1 out of 10 survive. Therefore, it is important to study new ways of treating cardiac arrest patients in order to improve survival.

The current standard practice for treating OHCA is to perform CPR and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) at the scene until either the heart is restarted or resuscitation efforts are considered hopeless and discontinued. This practice is supported by the fact that all currently proven CPR therapies can be delivered by paramedics in the field.

However, promising new strategies have emerged that are more feasible to initiate in the hospital. One such strategy is extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). ECPR requires placement of catheters in large blood vessels and connected to a machine to take over the work of the heart and lungs.

This purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and potential benefit of expedited transport with ongoing mechanical CPR for patients with refractory OHCA patients to an Emergency Department capable of initiating ECPR.

FDA approved this study as a staged feasibility study to enroll 15 participants and submit data prior to enrolling the second 15 participants. After enrolling 15 participants, the PI chose not to pursue an amendment to enroll additional participants due to slow accrual and research restrictions related to COVID.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OHCA of presumed non-traumatic etiology requiring CPR
  • Predicted arrival time at ECPR-capable hospital within timeframe specified
  • Witnessed arrest or initial shockable rhythm (VT or VF)
  • Persistent cardiac arrest after initial cardiac rhythm analysis and shock (if shock is indicated)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
  • Advanced directive indicating do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) or do not intubate (DNI)
  • Preexisting evidence of opting out of study
  • Prisoner
  • Pregnant (obvious or known)
  • ECPR capable ED is not at the destination hospital as determined by EMS
  • Legally authorized representative (LAR) or family member aware of study and refuses study participation at the scene

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard Care
Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) per existing EMS protocols at the scene of the cardiac arrest.
EXPERIMENTAL: Expedited Transport

Intervention: Expedited Transport with Mechanical CPR.

After initial Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) per existing EMS protocols, patients with refractory cardiac arrest are transported to an ECPR capable emergency department with ongoing mechanical CPR and ACLS for possible initiation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

Patients with OHCA refractory to initial BLS and ACLS will be transported by EMS with ongoing mechanical CPR and ACLS to an emergency department capable of initiating ECPR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emergency Department Arrivals Under 30 Minutes
Time Frame: Measured within one hour cardiac arrest onset
Proportion of patients with emergency department (ED) arrival less than or equal to 30 minutes from 911 call (or cardiac arrest onset if witnessed by EMS personnel).
Measured within one hour cardiac arrest onset
ECPR Initiations Under 30 Minutes
Time Frame: Measured within 2 hours of cardiac arrest onset
Proportion of ECPR eligible patients with ECPR flow initiated less than or equal to 30 minutes from ED arrival
Measured within 2 hours of cardiac arrest onset

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Neurological Outcome: CPC
Time Frame: At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest
Cerebral Performance Category score is widely used in cardiac arrest research to assess neurologic outcome
At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest
Functional Neurological Outcome: mRS
Time Frame: At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest
modified Rankin Score commonly used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a neurological disability.
At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest
Neuropsychological Outcome Battery: NIH Toolbox
Time Frame: At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest
The NIH toolbox includes cognitive testing and can be administered using an iPad
At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest
Neuro Quality of Life: Neuro QoL
Time Frame: 90 days after cardiac arrest
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders is a measurement system that evaluates and monitors the physical, mental, and social effects experienced by adults living with neurological conditions.
90 days after cardiac arrest
Safety: Composite Prevalence of 6 Specified Adverse Events
Time Frame: At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest
Composite safety endpoint of hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, vessel damage requiring vascular procedure or leading to occlusion, venous/arterial thromboembolism, stroke, renal failure, and infection.
At time of hospital discharge (an average of 7 days) and 90 days after cardiac arrest

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert W Neumar, MD, PhD, University of Michigan
  • Principal Investigator: Robert H Bartlett, MD, University of Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 5, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Clinical Trials on Expedited Transport With Mechanical CPR

3
Subscribe