Paramedic Initiated Treatment of Sepsis Targeting Out-of-hospital Patients (PITSTOP) (PITSTOP)

March 14, 2024 updated by: Dr. Damon Scales

Sepsis occurs when a serious infection - most commonly infection of the lungs, urinary system, or blood - leads to acute organ failure. It is a common, expensive, and frequently lethal condition. A growing body of evidence suggests that early recognition and treatment of sepsis can improve survival.

Unfortunately, many patients with sepsis do not receive key therapies until physicians working in Emergency Departments have assessed them - often introducing marked delays. It is estimated that one-half of patients with sepsis are treated and transported to hospital by paramedics. This allows paramedics a unique opportunity to provide early treatment at the initial point of patient contact, thereby decreasing the time to treatment for these critically ill patients. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether prompt recognition followed by early antibiotics and/or intravenous fluids delivered by paramedics in the field leads to improved survival, compared to usual care, for patients who are transported to the hospital with sepsis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The ultimate goal of this research program is to evaluate a fundamental change in the delivery of sepsis care. Currently, patients with severe sepsis do not receive key evidence-based therapies until they have been assessed in emergency departments - often introducing considerable delays. This research tests whether integrating paramedics directly into a chain-of-survival for sepsis will improve outcomes for these critically ill patients. In essence, this research seeks to break down silos of care, delivering sepsis treatments based on when they are needed, rather than on where the patient is physically located. If the trial is positive, the results will have broad implications for other health systems by showing that prehospital identification and treatment of sepsis increases the number of patients that survive this life-threatening condition. If the trial fails to demonstrate effectiveness of prehospital sepsis treatments, it will ensure that resources are not needlessly invested in large-scale implementations of paramedic sepsis protocols, as has been done in several other jurisdictions. A lack of benefit would also cast doubt on the observational data suggesting that early antibiotics are important, and suggest a more restrained approach to empiric antibiotic therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2040

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Halton Region Paramedic Services
        • Contact:
          • Chief Greg Sage
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Peel Region Paramedic Services
        • Contact:
          • Chief Peter Dundas
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Toronto Paramedic Services
        • Contact:
          • Chief Bikram Chawla
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • York Region Paramedic Services
        • Contact:
          • Chief Chris Spearen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with Sepsis, defined as (all 3 must be present): i) Paramedic suspects possible infection: e.g. suspected pneumonia, urinary tract infection, skin infection, bone and joint infection, intra-abdominal infection, meningitis ii) Presence of fever: Temperature ≥ 38.0°C measured by paramedic or history of fever during previous 24 hours iii) Presence of hypotension: Systolic blood pressure < 100mmHg
  2. Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Post cardiac arrest
  2. Suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
  3. Suspected acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
  4. Acute severe trauma
  5. Obvious severe non-traumatic bleeding
  6. Signs of fluid overload
  7. Suspected acute congestive heart failure (CHF)
  8. Known Clostridium difficile infection within the last 6 weeks
  9. Known pregnancy or breastfeeding
  10. Known allergy or sensitivity to penicillin or cephalosporin
  11. Receiving oral or subcutaneous anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparin
  12. Paramedic is unable to identify patient by first and last name and/or health card number

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Comparison 1: Prehospital Ceftriaxone
1g of Ceftriaxone will be administered by immediate intramuscular (IM) injection. The drug is provided in a sterile and completely covered vial as a white, odourless powder
Paramedics will administer 1g of intramuscular ceftriaxone.
Other Names:
  • Ceftriaxone
Placebo Comparator: Comparison 1: Placebo
The placebo is provided in a sterile and completely covered vial.
Paramedics will administer an identical volume of reconstituted intramuscular placebo.
Other Names:
  • 0.9% saline for injection
Experimental: Comparison 2: Liberal fluids
Paramedics will administer up to 2 litres of intravenous 0.9% saline solution to all participants in this arm regardless of blood pressure, reassessing for signs of volume overload after each 250ml.
Paramedics will administer up to 2 litres of intravenous saline (0.9%) to all patients regardless of systolic blood pressure, and reassessing this infusion after each 250ml are infused.
Other Names:
  • intravenous saline (0.9%) for injection
Active Comparator: Comparison 2: Conservative fluids
Paramedics will administer 0.9% saline solution to participants who have systolic blood pressure <90mmHg, and will only continue the infusion until the systolic blood pressure is >=100mmHg.
Paramedics will administer intravenous saline (0.9%) according to the Medical Directive, which allows for infusion of fluids if systolic blood pressure is <90mmHg and continued until systolic blood pressure is >=100mmHg.
Other Names:
  • intravenous saline (0.9%) for injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome: mortality prior to hospital discharge to day 90.
Time Frame: 90 days
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Organ dysfunction during first 24 hours (mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy (any), dialysis
Time Frame: 24 hours
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
24 hours
Organ dysfunction during hospitalization (mechanical ventilation)
Time Frame: until hospital discharge, measured up to maximum of day 90
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
until hospital discharge, measured up to maximum of day 90
duration of hospital admission (if any)
Time Frame: until hospital discharge, measured up to maximum of day 90
Measured in days from time of randomization
until hospital discharge, measured up to maximum of day 90
duration of first ICU admission (if any)
Time Frame: until ICU discharge, measured up to maximum of day 90
Measured in days from time of randomization
until ICU discharge, measured up to maximum of day 90
Proportion of patients with positive blood cultures obtained in hospital
Time Frame: 24 hours
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
24 hours
Microbiology results (if any)
Time Frame: 24 hours
Descriptive outcome, reported as frequency distribution of positive culture results
24 hours
Proportion of patients receiving antibiotics within first 24 hours of hospitalization
Time Frame: 24 hours
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
24 hours
Frequency distribution and mean time to first dose of antibiotics (if any) within first 24 hours of hospitalization
Time Frame: 24 hours
Measured in hours from time of randomization
24 hours
Proportion of patients receiving IV fluids (>250mL) within first 24 hours of hospitalization
Time Frame: 24 hours
measured in milliliters
24 hours
Total amount of IV fluids administered during transport and first 24 hours of hospitalization (if any)
Time Frame: 24 hours
measured in milliliters
24 hours
Proportion of patients with pulmonary edema identified during transport to hospital and on initial chest x-ray
Time Frame: during transport and on initial chest x-ray (if completed)
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
during transport and on initial chest x-ray (if completed)
Proportion of patients with blood, urine, sputum cultures that grow organisms resistant to ceftriaxone
Time Frame: 24 hours
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
24 hours
Proportion of patients diagnosed with sepsis or infection by emergency department physician
Time Frame: during admission
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
during admission
Proportion of hospitalized patients who grow any antibiotic-resistant organism (methicilin resistant S. aureus, Clostridium difficile, extended beta-lactamase resistant organisms)
Time Frame: during admission
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
during admission
Proportion of patients with anaphylaxis or suspected allergic reactions to study medication
Time Frame: during admission
Dichotomous outcome reported as percentage
during admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Damon Scales, MD PhD FRCPC, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on Comparison 1: Prehospital Ceftriaxone

3
Subscribe