Pilot Study of Regional Lung Ventilation

Pilot Study of Regional Lung Ventilation: Comparing Ventilation Images Computed From 4D CTs vs. Traditional Nuclear Medicine Ventilation Images

This is a prospective study of ventilation image comparison for lung functional information incorporation in thoracic cancer treatment planning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators hypothesize that a high resolution regional ventilation image (HRVI) based on 4D-CT imaging will correlate with the current low resolution state-of-the-art (SPECT-CT), which is the conventional way of measuring ventilation. HRVI may be a tool that could be widely used throughout the radiation therapy community because most radiation oncologists routinely employ 4D-CT technology in their own clinics. Investigators plan to test this hypothesis by comparing ventilation patterns on SPECT-CT images to HRVIs using a DICE analysis. As SPECT ventilation imaging is not included in our standard care, this study thus is designed as a pilot study.

Based on published data, the difference between the two methods for calculating the regional ventilation in the lower 50% ventilation volume is expected to have a standard deviation of about 0.1. Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the difference in the regional ventilation between SPECT-CT and 4D-CT pre-treatment would have a width of no more than 0.14 if 10 patients are enrolled and as small as 0.10 when 20 patients are registered.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that have early stage non-small cell lung cancer or clinical suspicion of the same in cases where the lesion is not amenable to biopsy but is enlarging and PET-positive. All patients are to be treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy as a monotherapy.
  • Eligible patients must have appropriate staging studies identifying them as specific subsets of AJCC 7th edition stage I or II based on only one of the following combinations of TNM staging:

    • T1a-b, N0, M0
    • T2a, N0, M0
    • T3 (invading the chest wall, <5 cm in diameter) N0 M0
  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
  • Women of childbearing potential and male participants must use an effective contraceptive method such as condom/diaphragm and spermicidal foam, intrauterine device, or prescription birth control pills.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with T2b tumors or T3 tumors >5 cm or patients with tumors involving the central chest/structures of the mediastinum;
  • Primary tumor of any T-stage within or touching the zone of the proximal bronchial tree, defined as a volume 2 cm in all directions around the proximal bronchial tree (carina, right and left main bronchi, right and left upper lobe bronchi, bronchus intermedius, right middle lobe bronchus, lingular bronchus, right and left lower lobe bronchi.
  • Direct evidence of regional or distant metastases after appropriate staging studies
  • Patients with active systemic, pulmonary, or pericardial infection;
  • Pregnant or lactating women, as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the embryo or fetus.
  • Patients that receive chemotherapy (induction or sequential)
  • Psychiatric or addictive disorders that impair subject's voluntary ability to participate in informed consent or protocol procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Ventilation Images for Comparison

Standard of Care: 4-D CT scan will be used to make a radiation treatment plan.

SPECT-CT Scan: This second scan will be done on another day to make a treatment plan for comparison to the first plan.

The 4-D CT scan shows how the tumor moves when patients breathe so that motion can be taken into account when planning the radiation. This is the usual way of planning lung radiation and everyone in this study will be planned using a 4-D CT scan.
Other Names:
  • 4-D computed tomography
It may be possible to make a more accurate plan by using a SPECT-CT scan for planning that would result in less damage to healthy lung tissue. This is not yet proven. A SPECT-CT scan uses a special camera to detect radioactivity to produce pictures which can lead to more precise information.
Other Names:
  • Single-photon emission computed tomography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Correlation of Ventilation Images
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
The primary objective is to compare the regional ventilation using SPECT-CT and that as determined from the pre-treatment 4D-CT routinely collected at simulation in lung/abdominal patients (standard of care). 50% of the lower portion lung image will be used for the purpose of determining the regional ventilation for this protocol.
Up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Dilling, M.D., H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 16, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 23, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on 4-D CT Scan

Subscribe