Lung MRI in the Management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (PIC'IRM)

May 19, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

LUNG MRI in the Management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis : PIC'IRM

High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) plays a major role in the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) by identifying characteristic lesions of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Though HRCT is the standard reference to describe pulmonary structural alterations using a non invasive technique, it is nonetheless a radiating exam which provides limited functional information regarding inflammation. In this trial, the investigators aimed to evaluate whether MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) using ultra-short echotime could be an alternative to HRCT in the assessment of the four morphological criteria required to define an UIP pattern. The investigators also planned to study the clinical value of the additional informations derived from MRI such as contrasts and lung perfusion using functional MRI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is an essential component in the diagnostic pathway of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). With the appropriate clinical setting, the presence of an usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on HRCT is sufficient to diagnose IPF. Four morphological criteria are required: (1) Subpleural, basal predominance, (2) Reticular abnormality, (3) Honeycombing with or without traction bronchiectasis, (4) Absence of features inconsistent with UIP pattern. However, HRCT is a radiating technique and only give data about structural alterations. Recent advances in three-dimensional ultra-short echo time (3D-UTE) imaging have shown promising results in improving lung MR (Magnetic Resonance) imaging quality. Since HRCT is the standard reference in IPF, the investigators aimed to evaluate whether thoracic MRI could be an alternative to HRCT in the assessment of the four radiologic criteria required for the diagnosis of IPF. Moreover, thoracic MRI could give new functional data, expected to relate to lung inflammation.

In order to study the diagnostic's accuracy of MRI for each radiological criteria defining UIP pattern, the investigators will compare HRCT and thoracic MRI of patients with IPF to HRCT and thoracic MRI of patients with other lung diseases that do not have all the UIP criteria.

Study procedure will be gadolinium-enhanced PETRA (pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition) MR sequencing compared to unenhanced HRCT within 15 days. No follow-up is needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pessac, France, 33604
        • CHU de Bordeaux

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years old followed in Bordeaux University Hospital
  • Patients with a definite diagnosis of IPF :

    • Based on a "certain" UIP pattern at HRCT without histopathology
    • Based on a "possible" UIP pattern at HRCT with histopathology given by surgical lung biopsy.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of fibrosing sarcoidosis after multidisciplinary discussion
  • Patients with a diagnosis of acute or sub-acute hypersensitivity pneumonitis after multidisciplinary discussion
  • Patients diagnosed with organizing pneumonia after multidisciplinary discussion
  • Patients with a diagnosis of isolated pleural plaques after multidisciplinary discussion
  • Patient able to withstand supine position for more than 30 minutes
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system
  • Patients who gave their written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject detained by judicial or administrative decision.
  • Major protected by law.
  • Subject not affiliated to a social security care
  • Subject in period of relative exclusion in relation to another protocol.
  • Patients with specific contraindication to undergoing MRI: iron material, a heart pacemaker, claustrophobia, gadolinium hypersensitivity, renal impairment with glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min, pregnant or nursing woman.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 : UIP pattern
18 patients with UIP pattern at HRCT and IPF as a definite diagnosis.
It will be performed on a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Acquisitions will be obtained in the axial plane using a 12-channel thorax/spine coil. Investigators will use previously published sequence parameters for each MRI sequence. PETRA will be acquired under free-breathing with respiratory gating at functional respiratory capacity.
It will be performed on a 16 (Sensation 16, Siemens®) or 64 channels (Definition 64, Siemens®), without contrast agent injection.
Experimental: Group 2 : possible UIP pattern
7 patients with " possible " UIP pattern at HRCT with histopathology given by surgical lung biopsy making the diagnosis of IPF.
It will be performed on a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Acquisitions will be obtained in the axial plane using a 12-channel thorax/spine coil. Investigators will use previously published sequence parameters for each MRI sequence. PETRA will be acquired under free-breathing with respiratory gating at functional respiratory capacity.
It will be performed on a 16 (Sensation 16, Siemens®) or 64 channels (Definition 64, Siemens®), without contrast agent injection.
Experimental: Group 3 : diagnosis of fibrosing sarcoidosis
15 patients with the diagnosis of fibrosing sarcoidosis after multidisciplinary discussion.
It will be performed on a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Acquisitions will be obtained in the axial plane using a 12-channel thorax/spine coil. Investigators will use previously published sequence parameters for each MRI sequence. PETRA will be acquired under free-breathing with respiratory gating at functional respiratory capacity.
It will be performed on a 16 (Sensation 16, Siemens®) or 64 channels (Definition 64, Siemens®), without contrast agent injection.
Experimental: Group 4 : lung diseases without reticulations
20 patients with lung diseases without reticulations (acute or sub-acute hypersensitivity pneumonitis, organizing pneumonia, isolated pleural plaques) .
It will be performed on a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Acquisitions will be obtained in the axial plane using a 12-channel thorax/spine coil. Investigators will use previously published sequence parameters for each MRI sequence. PETRA will be acquired under free-breathing with respiratory gating at functional respiratory capacity.
It will be performed on a 16 (Sensation 16, Siemens®) or 64 channels (Definition 64, Siemens®), without contrast agent injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of the diagnostic's accuracy of lung MRI compared to thoracic HRCT
Time Frame: Day 0
Identifying the four radiologic criteria defining UIP pattern at inclusion (D0): (1) Subpleural, basal predominance, (2) Reticular abnormality, (3) Honeycombing with or without traction bronchiectasis, (4) Absence of features inconsistent with UIP pattern.
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Presence of the four radiologic criteria defining UIP pattern in the group of patient with definite diagnosis of IPF but with "possible" UIP pattern.
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between perfusion defects in MRI and IPF severity assessed by pulmonary function test : Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between perfusion defects in MRI and IPF severity assessed by pulmonary function test : Transfer factor of carbon monoxide (TLCO)
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between perfusion defects in MRI and IPF severity assessed by 6 minutes exercise test
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between T2 signal intensity and IPF severity assessed by pulmonary function test : Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between T2 signal intensity and IPF severity assessed by pulmonary function test : Transfer factor of carbon monoxide (TLCO)
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between T2 signal intensity and IPF severity assessed by 6 minutes exercise test
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between gadolinium-enhanced signal and IPF severity assessed by pulmonary function test : Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between gadolinium-enhanced signal and IPF severity assessed by pulmonary function test : Transfer factor of carbon monoxide (TLCO)
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
Correlation between gadolinium-enhanced signal and IPF severity assessed by 6 minutes exercise test
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0
The interobserver agreement of the results of the MRI will be estimated by the Kappa coefficient
Time Frame: Day 0
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elodie BLANCHARD, MD, University Hospital, Bordeaux
  • Study Chair: Rodolphe THIEBAUT, MD PhD, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on MRI

Subscribe