The Adaptation, Usability, and Feasibility of a Mobile Health (mHealth) System to Improve Type 2 Diabetes Self-management in Thailand

December 20, 2017 updated by: Panan Pichayapinyo, University of Michigan
This project explores the feasibility of using automated telephone calls to adult patients with type 2 diabetes to improve diabetes self-management in Thailand. This line of work could significantly extend Thai nurses' ability to manage this growing epidemic, and ultimately reduce the suffering and costs caused by diabetes in Thailand.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is a serious shortage of community nurses to address Thailand's significant and expanding burden of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. However, mobile health (mHealth) strategies are likely to significantly improve and extend Thai nurses' ability to monitor and manage these patients. This study aims to:

1) investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally- and clinically-adapted mHealth intervention with adult Thai diabetic patients and their community nurses, and 2) estimate the intervention's effect upon glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, self-management behaviors, and diabetes-related distress in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Thirty-six patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (along with their regular nurses) will be recruited through an established community clinic network. After baseline clinical and behavioral assessment, patients will receive 12 weeks of automated 10-minute weekly Interactive Voice Response (IVR) calls to provide monitoring and self-management support related to glycemic symptoms, medication adherence, and several self-care behaviors. Patients' clinical nurse will receive weekly summaries of each IVR call by text message and email with guidance on Thai-appropriate best practices. Principal investigator will receive email whenever patients report a potentially urgent issue by IVR, i.e., symptoms of hypoglycemia, or inadequate supply of medication. Immediately after the 12-week intervention concludes, clinical and behavioral variables will be reassessed and a mixed-methods process evaluation will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pathumthani
      • Nong Sua, Pathumthani, Thailand, 12170
        • Buengbon Health Promoting Hospital
      • Nong Sua, Pathumthani, Thailand, 12170
        • Buengkasam 1 Health Promoting Hospital
      • Nong Sua, Pathumthani, Thailand, 12170
        • Buengkasam 2 Health Promoting Hospital
      • Nong Sua, Pathumthani, Thailand, 12170
        • Buengshamaor 1 Health Promoting Hospital
      • Nong Sua, Pathumthani, Thailand, 12170
        • Nongsamwang 1 Health Promoting Hospital
      • Nong Sua, Pathumthani, Thailand, 12170
        • Salakru Health Promoting Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For patients:

  1. poorly controlled type 2 diabetes as indicated by HbA1c ≥ 7.5% recorded within past 6 months
  2. aged 20 years and older
  3. currently being treated by oral antihyperglycemic
  4. communicates and reads in Thai
  5. has access to and able to use a touch-tone phone (either a land line or a mobile phone)
  6. free of major physical, cognitive, or psychiatric impairment (per medical records and PI discretion) that would prevent them from participating meaningfully in the intervention.

Inclusion criteria:

For nurses:

  1. works in a non-communicable disease clinic.
  2. can access email
  3. has a mobile telephone.

Exclusion Criteria:

For patients:

  1. have participated in other mHealth interventions within 3 months
  2. have baseline HbA1c < 7.5%
  3. are hospitalized or otherwise at risk for hospitalization
  4. are prescribed injected insulin
  5. patients and nurses who participated in the usability trial will be ineligible to participate in the pilot trial.

Exclusion criteria:

For nurses: None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient Arm using mHealth
Patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes
Patients will receive weekly automated IVR telephone calls for 12 weeks to assess their glycemic symptoms, medication adherence, dietary consumption, physical activity, sleep, and foot care. These 5-10 minute calls will follow a standardized Thai language IVR script developed specifically for this study.
Other Names:
  • mHealth
  • Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
Experimental: Community nurses
Nurses who receive mHealth report about patients in the patients' arm.
Nurses will also receive a technical troubleshooting guide, and have similar access to live telephone technical support. Once their patients' calls begin, nurses will begin receiving weekly e-mail reports summarizing each patients' assessment results, any active self-management problems the patients reported, and suggested strategies for supporting the patient's self-management.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It refers to glycated haemoglobin, which identifies average plasma glucose concentration.
13 weeks
Diabetes related distress
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be measured using the emotional and regimen subscales of a Thai translation of the well-validated Diabetes Distress Scale. This is a reliable and validated scale, and correlates with other measures of emotional distress. The responses range from 1-6. The higher scores indicate a greater degree of distress.
13 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It refers to blood glucose levels after refraining eating or drinking for at least 8 hours.
13 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using the same single item used during the IVR assessment, along with the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance-Short Form. The PROMIS (Patient-Report Outcomes Information System) Sleep Disturbance-Short Form is a 4-item self-report instrument covering the quality of sleep-wake functioning. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The higher scores indicating a greater degree of sleep disturbance.
13 weeks
Dietary consumption
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using the same single item used during the IVR assessment. The responses range from 0 to 7 (days).
13 weeks
Physical activity
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using the Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (Kiernan et al., 2013), which consists of 6 descriptive categories ranging from inactive (1) to very active, almost daily physical activity (6).
13 weeks
Foot care
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using the same single item used during the IVR assessment. The responses range from 0 to 7 (days).
13 weeks
Symptoms of hypoglycemia
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using a 7 items that ask about low blood sugar symptoms, the same that the study team describe in the IVR calls. The responses range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (6-7 days a week). The higher scores indicate a greater degree of hypoglycemic symptoms.
13 weeks
Depressive symptoms severity
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) (Kroenke et al., 2009). It consists of 8 items with a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.
13 weeks
Readiness for change
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using 5 items from our prior research that is specifically worded to measure participants'preparedness to change the 5 diabetes self-care behaviors that our program targets, which are answered using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much so). Higher scores indicate greater readiness for change.
13 weeks
Diabetes self-efficacy
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed with the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (Ritter et al., 2016). The scale consists of 8 items with 10- point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
13 weeks
Medical adherence
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using the Hill-Bone Compliance Scale (Kim et al., 2000), assesses how often patients miss taking medications, rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1(none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). In the study, only 8 items of Hill-Bone Compliance scale will be used. Reverse coded before analysis will be performed. Higher scores indicate greater medication adherence. In addition, 1-item of the Brief Medication Questionnaire will be used, which allows calculation of percent adherence over the past 2 weeks
13 weeks
Social support
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using selected items from the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire, which is a validated measure of number, type, and quality of relationships (Norbeck, 1983). For the purpose of this study, the 6 items (item 3-8) will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a great deal). Higher scores indicate better social support.
13 weeks
Health literacy
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be assessed using the 3-item screener developed by Chew et al. for detecting probable inadequate health literacy (45, 46). Higher scores indicate better health literacy.
13 weeks
Client satisfaction
Time Frame: 13 weeks
will be measured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) (Attkisson, Zwick, 1982), which assesses satisfaction with specific providers, settings, and time intervals, along with open-ended items (within the exit interview) adapted from prior mHealth research studies. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction of the program.
13 weeks
Self-efficacy (for nurse)
Time Frame: 13 weeks
It will be measured using Nurse Self-efficacy for Diabetes Care using 11 items developed for this study that correspond to patients' IVR content areas.
13 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Panan Pichayapinyo, PhD., University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00118973
  • 5D43TW009883-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Mobile health system

Subscribe